Is Senator Kennedy A Victim Of Pot Prohibition?

  • by Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director May 20, 2008

    Forgive me if the headline above sounds slightly exploitive. My intention is not to piggyback on a personal tragedy, but I did want to get your attention.

    In the fourteen years I’ve worked in marijuana law reform, few events have struck me as so needlessly tragic as the federal government’s consistent and deliberate stifling of medical cannabis research. Nowhere is the Feds’ refusal to allow this science more overt and inhumane than as it pertains to the investigation of cannabinoids as anti-cancer agents, particularly in the treatment of gliomas.

    As noted in today’s wire stories regarding Senator Edward Kennedy’s diagnosis, glioma is an aggressive form of cancer that affects an estimated 10,000 Americans annually. Standard treatments for the cancer include radiation and chemotherapy, though neither procedure has proven particularly effective — with the disease killing approximately half its victims within one year and all within three years.

    But what if there was an alternative treatment for gliomas that could selectively target the cancer while leaving healthy cells in tact? And what if federal bureaucrats were aware of this treatment, but deliberately withheld this information from the public?

    Sadly, the above questions are not hypothetical. As I originally wrote in 2004 essay for Alternet.org, entitled “Pot Shows Promise as a Cancer Cure

    In fact, the first experiment documenting pot’s anti-tumor effects took place in 1974 at the Medical College of Virginia at the behest of the U.S. government. The results of that study, reported in an Aug. 18, 1974, Washington Post newspaper feature, were that marijuana’s psychoactive component, THC, “slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent.”

    Despite these favorable preliminary findings, U.S. government officials banished the study, and refused to fund any follow-up research until conducting a similar – though secret – clinical trial in the mid-1990s. That study, conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program to the tune of $2 million concluded that mice and rats administered high doses of THC over long periods had greater protection against malignant tumors than untreated controls.

    However, rather than publicize their findings, government researchers shelved the results, which only became public after a draft copy of its findings were leaked in 1997 to a medical journal which in turn forwarded the story to the national media.

    In the years since the completion of the National Toxicology trial, the U.S. government has yet to fund a single additional study examining the drug’s potential anti-cancer properties. Is this a case of federal bureaucrats putting politics over the health and safety of patients? You be the judge.

    Fortunately, in the past ten years scientists overseas have generously picked up where U.S. researchers so abruptly left off, reporting that cannabinoids can halt the spread of numerous cancer cells — including prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and in one human clinical trial, brain cancer.

    Writing earlier this year in the journal Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, Italian researchers reiterated, “[C]annabinoids have displayed a great potency in reducing glioma tumor growth either in vitro or in animal experimental models. … [They] appear to be selective antitumoral agents as they kill glioma cells without affecting the viability of nontransformed counterparts.” Not one mainstream media outlet reported their findings. Perhaps now they’ll pay better attention.

    What possible advancements in the treatment of cancer may have been achieved over the past 34 years had US government officials chosen to advance — rather than suppress — clinical research into the anti-cancer effects of cannabis? It’s a shame we have to speculate; it’s even more tragic that the families of Senator Kennedy and thousands of others must suffer while we do.

    16 Responses to “Is Senator Kennedy A Victim Of Pot Prohibition?”

    1. denbee says:

      40 years ago I developed a brain tumor (pinealoma) which was inoperable at the time. A ventricular shunt and 5 weeks of radiation treatments was the standard treatment. I started using cannabis to help with the nausea and found that it reduced my seizures better than the dilantin the doc prescribed. 40 years later I no longer have seizures, have not taken dilantin in 39 years but I use cannabis almost daily. It gives me a brief sense of well being and comfort in an often chaotic world. That it may protect my health too is something I have always suspected. What force, what reason is behind the continued fear mongering that keeps cannabis illegal even in light of the truth? Are we so completely brainwashed by the “reefer madness” propaganda that even the truth cannot bridge the lies and mis-information 70 years hence? Reasonable people seek reason and logic in the laws that govern them. “Without reason, compassion and a sense of moral right and wrong, your laws are worth less than the paper they’re printed on.” Words to ponder for future lawmakers. And also, remind them that cannabis users are a very large and active voters group now days. Your laws have not served to shut us up and you are hearing now just how loud our common voice can be. Reform your ignorant cannabis laws, we don’t believe you anymore.

    2. […] said this before but it bears repeating. What possible advancements in the treatment of cancer could have been […]

    3. Journalism Wall Street Journal Viewpoint Media Player…

      I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

    4. […] a single person has died from using Cannabis, but it’s prohibition has killed hundreds. If the Government would wizen up, and learn from earlier attempts to legislate […]

    5. […] In the fourteen years I??ve worked in marijuana law reform, few events have struck me as so neehttp://blog.norml.org/2008/05/20/is-senator-kennedy-a-victim-of-pot-prohibition/N.J. Considering Medical Marijuana Bill CBS 3 PhiladelphiaPatients suffering from cancer, AIDS, […]

    6. G Edward says:

      My mother at 78 and very healthy was diagnosed with Glioblastoma multiforma just a week before Senator Kennedy. She is largely asymptomatic and has just started both radiology and chemo. (Her cancer is inoperable.) She has some of the best doctors available in the SF Bay Area and yet no one has mentioned the work of Dr. Manual Guzman (Complutense University, Madrid, Spain).

      Dr. Guzman has confirmed that “Cannabinoids appeared to stifle VEGF production by increasing the activity of a substance that controls cell death, called ceramide”.

      There is a very real and immediate need to get this information in to the hands of everyone involved with cancer patient care.

      Dr. Guzman has been publishing his results since 2004.

      While the Kennedy Clan has suffered more than their fair share of tragedy, if this headline gets their attention and gets them to look at this research, then it is well worth any offense that might have resulted from a headline.

    Leave a Reply