<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massachusetts Law Enforcement: Sour Grapes and Sore Losers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:37:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: occadcara</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-20908</link>
		<dc:creator>occadcara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-20908</guid>
		<description>Such or recreational travelers car insurance .online car insurance australia is focused on mexican auto insurance norich union car insurance groups guide uk ,sometime  car insurance quotes by email 
without Before state farm insurance You search here  compare  car insurance quote compari .Ok, here [url=http://rpm.livna.org/rlowiki/CarInsurance?action=AttachFile&amp;do=get&amp;target=m]long beach compare cheap car insurance online[/url] compare cheap car insurance online daly city .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such or recreational travelers car insurance .online car insurance australia is focused on mexican auto insurance norich union car insurance groups guide uk ,sometime  car insurance quotes by email<br />
without Before state farm insurance You search here  compare  car insurance quote compari .Ok, here [url=http://rpm.livna.org/rlowiki/CarInsurance?action=AttachFile&amp;do=get&amp;target=m]long beach compare cheap car insurance online[/url] compare cheap car insurance online daly city .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vote like a Beast</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-11977</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote like a Beast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-11977</guid>
		<description>CONGRATS TO #17 AND #20.   Go back and read their comments again.(also #25)  The prohibitionist ARE already planning on nationwide decriminalization as a fall back position.  They know they can&#039;t stop decrim on a state by state basis.  Someday soon you WILL be able to get busted with less than an ounce and not be arrested.   But oh yeah,  they will post your name to a website.  Applying for a job, don&#039;t waist your time.  Need to go to the doctor or hospital, bring cash.  Buying a home, not in any decent neighborhood.  Exercise any of your constitutional rights as an American citizen, marijuana is ALWAYS  the exception.   
     While I do strongly agree with #20 as to the shameful  record of almost all Democrat politicians,  according to Zogby polls most voters who favor prohibition vote for Democrats,  most prohibitionist vote Republican.  Pot Smokers it seems, much like Democrats, are a TIMID bunch.  Help change this by supporting the good work that the arch conservative publication NATIONAL REVIEW,  write letters supporting that publication&#039;s more than courageous stand on marijuana.   Tell all who seek public office that you CAN NO LONGER VOTE  for any candidate who SUPPORTS PROHIBITION.  &quot;IT WOULD SEND THE WRONG MESSAGE&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CONGRATS TO #17 AND #20.   Go back and read their comments again.(also #25)  The prohibitionist ARE already planning on nationwide decriminalization as a fall back position.  They know they can&#8217;t stop decrim on a state by state basis.  Someday soon you WILL be able to get busted with less than an ounce and not be arrested.   But oh yeah,  they will post your name to a website.  Applying for a job, don&#8217;t waist your time.  Need to go to the doctor or hospital, bring cash.  Buying a home, not in any decent neighborhood.  Exercise any of your constitutional rights as an American citizen, marijuana is ALWAYS  the exception.<br />
     While I do strongly agree with #20 as to the shameful  record of almost all Democrat politicians,  according to Zogby polls most voters who favor prohibition vote for Democrats,  most prohibitionist vote Republican.  Pot Smokers it seems, much like Democrats, are a TIMID bunch.  Help change this by supporting the good work that the arch conservative publication NATIONAL REVIEW,  write letters supporting that publication&#8217;s more than courageous stand on marijuana.   Tell all who seek public office that you CAN NO LONGER VOTE  for any candidate who SUPPORTS PROHIBITION.  &#8220;IT WOULD SEND THE WRONG MESSAGE&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuckie</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-10146</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 02:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-10146</guid>
		<description>Where I work in MA we are subject to random drug testing.  If I test positive for pot I lose my job.  How can this be legal..with the new decriminalization law now in effect?  Are there any lawyers out there who can respond?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where I work in MA we are subject to random drug testing.  If I test positive for pot I lose my job.  How can this be legal..with the new decriminalization law now in effect?  Are there any lawyers out there who can respond?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-9967</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-9967</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d2fxCfrWpg
Video from 2008 MassCann/NORML Boston Freedom Rally!

Party tonight in Weymouth to celebrate and politic, gather our people for the upcoming local battles. I look forward to the first city that decides to repeal or amend this. 10,000 stoners on city hall!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d2fxCfrWpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d2fxCfrWpg</a><br />
Video from 2008 MassCann/NORML Boston Freedom Rally!</p>
<p>Party tonight in Weymouth to celebrate and politic, gather our people for the upcoming local battles. I look forward to the first city that decides to repeal or amend this. 10,000 stoners on city hall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tone</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-9711</link>
		<dc:creator>Tone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-9711</guid>
		<description>Let thy will of the people be carried out!

No surprise that the ONLY people against this are police... smell something fishy?

Drug testing in jeopardy?  My god we test peoploe who stack meaningless movies on shelves.. yet the most powerful positions, hell ALL of them... are exempt from testing?!?!?!?! 

Our last 3, count them 3 Presidetns have smoked marijuana and yet they sit in the White House while thousands of decent tax paying Americans are sitting in the big house.... How can this be allowed to continue? 

Welcome to the hypocritical States of America

Anyway congrats to you guys in Mass for passing the vote... hopefully, one day, we here in Florida will have a similar action in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let thy will of the people be carried out!</p>
<p>No surprise that the ONLY people against this are police&#8230; smell something fishy?</p>
<p>Drug testing in jeopardy?  My god we test peoploe who stack meaningless movies on shelves.. yet the most powerful positions, hell ALL of them&#8230; are exempt from testing?!?!?!?! </p>
<p>Our last 3, count them 3 Presidetns have smoked marijuana and yet they sit in the White House while thousands of decent tax paying Americans are sitting in the big house&#8230;. How can this be allowed to continue? </p>
<p>Welcome to the hypocritical States of America</p>
<p>Anyway congrats to you guys in Mass for passing the vote&#8230; hopefully, one day, we here in Florida will have a similar action in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-9695</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-9695</guid>
		<description>WTF is wrong with the people in this country...You would think that there are bigger concerns than what drugs someone does....what does it matter....if someone wants to screw up their body thats fine wit me....People should be more concerned witht this idiot new president that the minority voted for...who allowed this country to be run by the minority anyway...WTF...i guess america is going down the tubes ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF is wrong with the people in this country&#8230;You would think that there are bigger concerns than what drugs someone does&#8230;.what does it matter&#8230;.if someone wants to screw up their body thats fine wit me&#8230;.People should be more concerned witht this idiot new president that the minority voted for&#8230;who allowed this country to be run by the minority anyway&#8230;WTF&#8230;i guess america is going down the tubes &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James DiLeo</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-9494</link>
		<dc:creator>James DiLeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-9494</guid>
		<description>Consider the fact that many states now have privatized prisons. That sell stock on the NY stock exchange. 

Consider the fact that most judicial systems also sell their revenue streams (fines/court costs/tickets) on the International Markets. If your in the know, and know how to use dun &amp; bradstreet you can find out for yourself. 

Now you take all that and realize that they have now lost a revenue stream. Some banker or broker somewhere isn&#039;t going to get his new BMW  as soon as he wants this year. 

Now add the pressure that will be applied from above to lower management. THey will begin to make up any number of stupid ideas and some will be so devious you will not believe that people can be that way.

Start waking up to how deep drugs have gotten into banking in this country. 

You keep trying to fight a system that you believe is just religiously motivated. 

No, your not getting it. It is people who are financially motivated and using religion as a cover.

...Wake up, follow the money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider the fact that many states now have privatized prisons. That sell stock on the NY stock exchange. </p>
<p>Consider the fact that most judicial systems also sell their revenue streams (fines/court costs/tickets) on the International Markets. If your in the know, and know how to use dun &amp; bradstreet you can find out for yourself. </p>
<p>Now you take all that and realize that they have now lost a revenue stream. Some banker or broker somewhere isn&#8217;t going to get his new BMW  as soon as he wants this year. </p>
<p>Now add the pressure that will be applied from above to lower management. THey will begin to make up any number of stupid ideas and some will be so devious you will not believe that people can be that way.</p>
<p>Start waking up to how deep drugs have gotten into banking in this country. </p>
<p>You keep trying to fight a system that you believe is just religiously motivated. </p>
<p>No, your not getting it. It is people who are financially motivated and using religion as a cover.</p>
<p>&#8230;Wake up, follow the money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-9482</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-9482</guid>
		<description>Dennis,

It is Massachusetts. But Dennis, if you point to one party or the other as being more responsible for the war on marijuana, you have fallen into the trap that politicians of both parties have set for you. They want to keep us busy pointing fingers at each other instead of holding congressional and state politicians&#039; feet to the fire on this subject.

Take note...the same number of people were arrested for simple marijuana possession during Clinton as during Bush, about 5 million each.

How do you explain this?

Further, in every period of drug war ramp up, the Democrats controlled Congress by a wide margin. They are the people and that is the body that make laws. The Republican Congress between 1994 and 2002 did not appreciably change drug laws.

Some of the most virulent prohibitionists are Democrats, such as California&#039;s Dianne Feinstein and Harry Reid, who promised me on a radio talk show call in 2000 (KKOH Reno) that, due to a conversation with a handicapped person he knew to be of good character, the congress, &quot;should look at that,&quot; meaning the medical marijuana question.

Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, where the modern medical marijuana movement began, has not been interested in the subject since becoming speaker. 

Where is your criticism, Dennis, or even your acknowledgment of this betrayal by so many Democrats for so long?

See how they have got you in their trap?

Prohibition of marijuana and other drugs and its drug war implementation are the most bi-partisan policies of all. Both parties love, cherish and protect it equally, mostly because so many state and congressional members and leaders come out of Law Enforcement.

 And this is a jobs issue for law enforcement, for if 770,000 people a year were not arrested and adjudicated for simple marijuana possession, far fewer cops and judicial personnel would be necessary.

Or those that exist would have to start fighting real crime, like murder, rape, and child molestation, which is far more dangerous and far less fun than harassing pot smokers.

If you insist on blaming one side or the other, people like say me, a Republican who has been in the anti-prohibition trenches since my first trip to Amsterdam in 1986, you will never be able to bring a plurality or a majority of people behind us and into the movement to end these counterproductive laws.

It is up to you, and others like you, to lay down your differences with &quot;Republicans,&quot; and set your sites on those who support and defend marijuana prohibition, whatever their party or whatever their opinion on other issues.

Your choice,

Eric Johnson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>It is Massachusetts. But Dennis, if you point to one party or the other as being more responsible for the war on marijuana, you have fallen into the trap that politicians of both parties have set for you. They want to keep us busy pointing fingers at each other instead of holding congressional and state politicians&#8217; feet to the fire on this subject.</p>
<p>Take note&#8230;the same number of people were arrested for simple marijuana possession during Clinton as during Bush, about 5 million each.</p>
<p>How do you explain this?</p>
<p>Further, in every period of drug war ramp up, the Democrats controlled Congress by a wide margin. They are the people and that is the body that make laws. The Republican Congress between 1994 and 2002 did not appreciably change drug laws.</p>
<p>Some of the most virulent prohibitionists are Democrats, such as California&#8217;s Dianne Feinstein and Harry Reid, who promised me on a radio talk show call in 2000 (KKOH Reno) that, due to a conversation with a handicapped person he knew to be of good character, the congress, &#8220;should look at that,&#8221; meaning the medical marijuana question.</p>
<p>Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, where the modern medical marijuana movement began, has not been interested in the subject since becoming speaker. </p>
<p>Where is your criticism, Dennis, or even your acknowledgment of this betrayal by so many Democrats for so long?</p>
<p>See how they have got you in their trap?</p>
<p>Prohibition of marijuana and other drugs and its drug war implementation are the most bi-partisan policies of all. Both parties love, cherish and protect it equally, mostly because so many state and congressional members and leaders come out of Law Enforcement.</p>
<p> And this is a jobs issue for law enforcement, for if 770,000 people a year were not arrested and adjudicated for simple marijuana possession, far fewer cops and judicial personnel would be necessary.</p>
<p>Or those that exist would have to start fighting real crime, like murder, rape, and child molestation, which is far more dangerous and far less fun than harassing pot smokers.</p>
<p>If you insist on blaming one side or the other, people like say me, a Republican who has been in the anti-prohibition trenches since my first trip to Amsterdam in 1986, you will never be able to bring a plurality or a majority of people behind us and into the movement to end these counterproductive laws.</p>
<p>It is up to you, and others like you, to lay down your differences with &#8220;Republicans,&#8221; and set your sites on those who support and defend marijuana prohibition, whatever their party or whatever their opinion on other issues.</p>
<p>Your choice,</p>
<p>Eric Johnson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerpal Singh</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-9477</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerpal Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-9477</guid>
		<description>The police should be informed that no one cares what they think in this matter.  They are paid employees, paid to do a job.  If the law holds that small amouts of marijuana should not be charged as a crime, then dont charge it as a crime.  

The take home message is follow the dictates of your employer or find a new job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The police should be informed that no one cares what they think in this matter.  They are paid employees, paid to do a job.  If the law holds that small amouts of marijuana should not be charged as a crime, then dont charge it as a crime.  </p>
<p>The take home message is follow the dictates of your employer or find a new job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Permanentillt</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-9468</link>
		<dc:creator>Permanentillt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/12/27/massachusetts-law-enforcement-sour-grapes-and-sore-losers/#comment-9468</guid>
		<description>http://www.masscops.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64523&amp;highlight=marijuana

This site about made me cry, it is soooooo sad that this is the culture of the people &quot;protecting&quot; us. It is sad that the job of Police Officer attracts mainly total scumbags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.masscops.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64523&amp;highlight=marijuana" rel="nofollow">http://www.masscops.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64523&amp;highlight=marijuana</a></p>
<p>This site about made me cry, it is soooooo sad that this is the culture of the people &#8220;protecting&#8221; us. It is sad that the job of Police Officer attracts mainly total scumbags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
