Latest DOJ Memo Emphasizes Why We Must Pass HR 2306, The Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act Of 2011

  • by Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director July 1, 2011

    On Wednesday the Obama administration for the second time in two years issued a Department of Justice memorandum regarding the state-sanctioned use and production of medical cannabis. However, unlike the release of the 2009 ‘Ogden memo,’ which the administration promoted with great fanfare, the issuance of this week’s ‘Cole memorandum’ is strategically being downplayed by the Justice Department.

    As for the content of the memo, which you can read in full here, it’s hardly surprising — particularly in light of the administration’s recent, and highly public threats to lawmakers in states wishing to enact medical marijuana laws or expand upon their existing programs.

    Perhaps most notably, the memorandum states that the recent flurry of intimidating US Attorney letters to state lawmakers are ‘entirely consistent’ with the Obama administration’s position. In other words, the administration is now on record in support of claims made by US Attorneys in Rhode Island, Washington, and other states alleging that state employees could be targeted and federally prosecuted for simply registering and licensing medical cannabis patients or providers — a position that is even more extreme than that of the previous administration. (Notably to date, however, no state employee — or for that matter, no state sanctioned dispensary operator — has ever been prosecuted by the federal government.)

    The memo goes on to state that the federal government distinguishes between individual medical cannabis patients and third party providers, indicating that it is a poor use of federal resources (rather than a poor use of judgment) to target the former, while indicating that the latter are fair game for federal prosecution. It states:

    “A number of states have enacted some form of legislation relating to the medical use of marijuana. Accordingly the Ogden memo reiterated to you that prosecution of significant traffickers in illegal drugs, including marijuana, remains a core priority, but advised that it is likely not an efficient use of federal resources to focus enforcement efforts on individuals with cancer or other serious illnesses who use marijuana as part of a recommended treatment regimen consistent with applicable state law, or their caregivers. The term “caregiver” as used in the memorandum meant just that: individuals providing care to individuals with cancer or other serious illnesses, not commercial operations cultivating, selling or distributing marijuana.”

    Finally, the memo acknowledges that there has been an increase in the number of states that have either enacted or are considering enacting state laws allowing for the licensed production and distribution of cannabis to authorized patients. (To date, such state-licensed dispensaries are up and running in Colorado, New Mexico, and Maine; laws permitting such facilities are on the books in Arizona, Delaware, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont.) Clearly, the federal government is not at all pleased with this progress.

    The Odgen Memorandum was never intended to shield such activities from federal enforcement action and prosecution, even where those activities purport to comply with state law. Persons who are in the business of cultivating. selling, or distributing marijuana, and those who knowingly facilitate such activities, are in violation of the Controlled Substances Act, regardless of state law. Consistent with the resource constraints and the discretion you may exercise in your district, such persons are subject to federal enforcement action, including potential prosecution. State laws or local ordinances are not a defense to civil enforcement of federal law with respect to such conduct, including enforcement of the CSA. Those who engage in transactions involving the proceeds of such activity may also be in violation of federal money laundering statutes and other federal financing laws.”

    Regardless of how one wishes to interpret the latest memo from the DOJ, one thing is clear. States will never truly enjoy the freedom to experiment with alternative marijuana policies until the federal government is compelled to get out of their way. Only the passage of HR 2306, the ‘Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2011,’ can make that happen.

    House Bill 2306 mimics changes enacted by Congress that repealed the federal prohibition of alcohol by removing the federal government’s power to prosecute minor marijuana offenders. It would eliminate the existing conflict between federal law and the laws of those sixteen states that already allow for the limited use of marijuana under a physicians’ supervision. Further, it would permit state governments that wish to fully legalize and regulate the responsible use, possession, production, and intrastate distribution of marijuana for all adults to be free to do so without federal interference.

    State lawmakers should be free to explore alternate marijuana policies — including medicalization, decriminalization, and/or legalization — without being held hostage to archaic federal prohibition or the whims of the Department of Justice. Contact your member of Congress and urge him or her to vote ‘yes’ on HR 2306.

    112 Responses to “Latest DOJ Memo Emphasizes Why We Must Pass HR 2306, The Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act Of 2011”

    1. (RET)SFC Connie L. Jackson says:

      Please support HR 2306 Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition.

    2. gmuny2002 says:

      Obviously the government hasn’t learned anything from the prohibitation of alcohol! And with the two wars going on, they haven’t learned from Viet Nam either! Oh, I’m sorry, they did learn how to manipulate the news coming from the battle front, my mistake!

    3. Brandon says:

      I challenge the United States Department of Justice, the DEA, and the Obama Administration to all attempt to arrest, prosecute, and criminalize the State employees for authorizing medical cannabis. It can’t be done, both legally and morally.

    4. Brandon says:

      Well maybe they can find a way legally, but I’d like to see them take that up with 70+% of Americans. Assholes.

    5. Ryan says:

      “Those who engage in transactions involving the proceeds of such activity may also be in violation of federal money laundering statutes and other federal financing laws.”

      Are not the taxes collected from these businesses, proceeds in some sort? I am confused?

    6. Jim Sanders says:

      The growing and use of Marijuana has never been a crime in the Republic for the united States of America. I can prove it with case law if, and history. The law making marijuana a crime is a unlawful(DE FACTO)CRIME, and has never existed!!! I have never smoked Marijuana, but that doesn’t mean I/WE the People don’t have a Right to grow and use it!!! Marijuana is food!!! The government can’t outlaw FOOD!!!!!! If anybody want to hear the TRUTH You can email me http://www.revbatman@aol.com leave me a phone number and I call you with proof!!!

    7. And the DOJ continues to spew out more propaganda, in accordance with the wishes of their “true constituency.”

    8. Trogo says:

      I’m sure Gov. Jan Brewer here in AZ will use these statements to try and shut down the recently voter passed medical marijuana bill. I am so tired of this run-around, hypocritical, egotistical, voter ignoring and self-fulfilling stance that the Federal Governement and people like Jan Brewer keep taking. I am especially irritated with those that keep backing them up!

    9. Tim says:

      “…regardless of state law”? That’s what makes us America – individual States comprising a Nation that lives under the rules and guidelines of the Constitution! Do we need the Government to tell us that only they know what is best for us, and need to protect us from making any wrong choices or decisions we might make individually, that they think might hurt the collective or society? To tell us that we do not have the Right to make these choices for ourselves individually, that they must make these choices for us collectively? You can be put in jail, for up to six months, for installing a toilet tank the Government does not want you to have. Is This Not Tyranny?

      All you have is your life. How you choose to live it, and the choices that you make is what makes you the individual that you are, not what the government chooses for you. When you can no longer choose for yourself, but the government chooses for you, by enforcing its will upon you, for your own good and the good of the collective, you are no longer free, but living under tyranny and slavery.

      With the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the Supreme Laws of the United States of America, we need to return to where we once were as free individuals, with less restrictive laws, regulations and Government; to be free and stay free, individual and free, in the Freest Nation on Earth… or are we?

    Leave a Reply