Loading

Two of the Largest American Newspapers Opine in Favor of Allowing States to Legalize Marijuana

  • by Erik Altieri, NORML Communications Director November 26, 2012

    In the wake of the historic votes for marijuana law reform on November 6th, there has been a renewed focus on the topic and a shift in tone amongst the mainstream media. While previously, many outlets have either covered our efforts with a wink and a nod (or didn’t cover them at all), now that two states have called for the end of marijuana prohibition, reporters are rushing to cover the story. Along the way it seems they are also getting a crash course education in the concepts of civil liberties, federalism, and the disasters of our country’s prohibition on cannabis. Many are beginning to wake up to the reality that we have long identified: cannabis prohibition is a failed policy that has destructive effects on our society and these effects can be remedied by legalization and regulation.

    Look no further for a sign of the changing times than editorials featured this weekend by two of the United States’ largest newspapers, the New York Times and the Washington Post. Both papers featured columns from their staff opining in favor of marijuana law reform. It seems the days of traditionally conservative editorial boards writing against cannabis law reforms may be coming to an end.

    There is a seismic shift happening in the national consciousness on marijuana policy in response to the legalization of cannabis in Colorado and Washington, we are winning new converts by the day and those previously afraid to speak out are now doing so with passion and vigor. This recent influx of mainstream media outlets jumping on board with reform is just the beginning of the avalanche of change that is to come.

    The New York Times by Timothy Egan, NYT Opinion Writer:

    Give Pot a Chance

    For what stands between ending this absurd front in the dead-ender war on drugs and the status quo is the federal government. It could intervene, citing the supremacy of federal law that still classifies marijuana as a dangerous drug.

    But it shouldn’t. Social revolutions in a democracy, especially ones that begin with voters, should not be lightly dismissed. Forget all the lame jokes about Cheetos and Cheech and Chong. In the two-and-a-half weeks since a pair of progressive Western states sent a message that arresting 853,000 people a year for marijuana offenses is an insult to a country built on individual freedom, a whiff of positive, even monumental change is in the air.

    …there remains the big question of how President Obama will handle the cannabis spring. So far, he and Attorney General Eric Holder have been silent. I take that as a good sign, and certainly a departure from the hard-line position they took when California voters were considering legalization a few years ago.

    Source

    The Washington Post by Washington Post Editorial Board:

    Marijuana’s Foot in the Door

    …Or the Justice Department could keep its hands off, perhaps continuing the approach the feds have largely taken for some time — focusing scarce resources on major violators, such as big growers that might serve multi-state markets, cultivators using public lands or dispensaries near schools. The last option is clearly best.

    But it’s unrealistic and unwise to expect federal officials to pick up the slack left by state law- enforcement officers who used to enforce marijuana prohibitions against pot users and small-time growers. Unrealistic, because it would require lots more resources. Unwise, because filling prisons with users, each given a criminal stain on his or her record, has long been irrational. For the latter reason, we favor decriminalizing possession of small amounts of pot, assessing civil fines instead of locking people up.

    Also, for that reason and others, the Justice Department should hold its fire on a lawsuit challenging Colorado and Washington’s decision to behave more leniently. And state officials involved in good-faith efforts to regulate marijuana production and distribution according to state laws should be explicitly excused from federal targeting.

    Source

    54 Responses to “Two of the Largest American Newspapers Opine in Favor of Allowing States to Legalize Marijuana”

    1. Chris Gilbert says:

      I’m waiting to see when the conservative newspapers, Wall Street Journal, etc. jump on the bandwagon. After all, they’re all about keeping the government out of our lives, right?

    2. Phil E. Drifter says:

      Washington, D.C. was designated to be outside of any particular state because they did not want any one state having undue power over the federal government. Google a few choice words on why the national capitol was moved from Philadelphia to Washington, D.C. shortly after the revolutionary war.

    3. Dave Evans says:

      Michael, this is what happens when people are abused, they often times stop being fully functional, physically and/or mentally. Apparently, we still must approve of some sort of “cracker type activity” with regards to marijuana; it is “legal” but we can still punish you so unduly it is nothing but abuse. Who thinks like this? How does hurting innocence people help us?

      If keeping it to one ounce is supposed to be some sort of “safety issue”, then why not just focus on telling people not to carry more than an ounce and only attach a small fine? Too fair?

    4. Trina Sonnenberg says:

      Marijuana does not kill people. Alcohol and tobacco do.

      I wonder what would happen if everyone switched to cocaine; the government says it is less harmful.

    Leave a Reply