But ill tell what is psychotic,the notion of a perfect future “drug free society” propoganda that started during the 80s.The people that are profiting on this notion,know that everything would change as far as their earnings and their corperate institutions,(if there was a drug free society),so they actualy are dependent on those “evil& misguided drug users for their livelihood.It has nothing to do with the innocent children that have their families torn apart by the “drug war,” because they need fresh new bodies to keep the dynamics going.

Thank god people are waking up to this,but it also has to do with generational differences as well…Where talking about princeables like-honesty,values and morality.

1) The object was to achieve X. It did not achieve Y. Therefore it does not work ? At best “Ignoratio elenchi” !
2) The “do not drive while blindfold” law did not reduce the number of deaths whiile driving. We conclude that there is no evidence that driving while blindfolded is dangerous. What are you guys on ?

I think that you guys have been consuming far too much of your product, and as the REPUTABLE PEER REVIEWED research shows, regular consumption has both short AND long term affects on cognitive ability.

I think that you have just provided significant additional evidence that it should NOT be legalised !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iq0ugpXuZI

An investigator from Aalborg University and the Institute of Transport Economics in Oslo assessed the risk of road accident associated with drivers’ use of licit and illicit drugs, including amphetamines, analgesics, anti-asthmatics, anti-depressives, anti-histamines, benzodiazepines, cannabis, cocaine, opiates, penicillin and zopiclone (a sleeping pill). His study reviewed data from 66 separate studies evaluating the use of illicit or prescribed drugs on accident risk; the study found that cannabis was associated with minor, but not significantly increased odds of traffic injury (1.06) or fatal accident (1.25). By comparison, opiates (1.44), benzodiazepine tranquillizers (2.30), anti-depressants (1.32), cocaine (2.96), amphetamines (4.46), and the sleeping aid zopiclone (2.60) were all associated with a greater risk of fatal accident than cannabis. Anti-histamines (1.12) and penicillin (1.12) were associated with comparable odds to cannabis.

But, unlike with alcohol, the accident risk caused by cannabis, particularly among those who are not acutely intoxicated, appears limited because subjects under its influence are generally aware of their impairment and compensate to some extent, such as by slowing down and by focusing their attention when they know a response will be required. [Allison Smiley. Marijuana: On-Road and Driving Simulator Studies]

This response is the opposite of that exhibited by drivers under the influence of alcohol, who tend to drive in a more risky manner proportional to their intoxication.[United Kingdom's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. The Classification of Cannabis Under the Misuse of Drugs Act of 1971. 2002: See specifically: Chapter 4, Section 4.3.5: "Cannabis differs from alcohol; ... it seems not to increase risk-taking behavior. This may explain why it appears to play a smaller role than alcohol in road traffic accidents."]