Report: Over 100,000 NYC Residents Could Benefit From Access To Medical Cannabis

  • by Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director August 29, 2013

    More than 100,000 New York City residents suffering from serious medical conditions such as cancer and chronic pain could benefit from legal access to cannabis therapy, according to a report released today by the New York City Comptroller’s Office. The mission of the Comptroller’s Office is to ensure the financial health of New York City by advising the Mayor, the City Council, and the public of the City’s financial condition.

    The report, entitled “100,000 Reasons: Medical Marijuana in the Big Apple,” finds that some 8 out of 10 New Yorkers endorse permitting patient access to medical cannabis, and estimates that at least 100,000 City residents would immediately benefit from its legalization.

    “[W]e believe this is a conservative estimate,” authors of the report state, “because registration for medical marijuana programs in the various states falls short of the potential. Patients experience social stigma and related social sanctions for using medical marijuana, and many doctors are not familiar with its benefits. Moreover, the federal government has created unnecessary obstacles for academic and research institutions to study marijuana, thereby impeding research that could lead to a broader use of medical marijuana.”

    The report endorses various legal and legislative efforts to amend state and federal marijuana laws. Locally, the report’s authors recommend that New York City establish a ‘Medical Cannabis Research Fund’ to engage in clinical study of the plant; they further proposes the establishment of cannabis grow operations at selected public hospitals. The report also recommends that health insurance providers be required cover some costs related to medical cannabis expenses.

    “In the 1980s, New York State acknowledged marijuana’s medicinal value and supported research for chemotherapy patients,” the report concludes. “Even though the findings were impressive, the State stopped there. Thirty years later, New York still denies seriously ill patients access to this evidence-based treatment, even as 20 states and Washington D.C. have legalized it. … Today, at least 100,000 New York City residents with the same afflictions could benefit from the same relief. By following the recommendations outlined in this report, we can hit the ground running where we left off just 30 years ago and make a meaningful impact for New Yorkers suffering today and for years to come.”

    The Comptroller’s Office had previously issued a report estimating that regulating and taxing marijuana for New York City residents age 21 and over would yield an estimated $431 million in annual savings and revenue.

    New York City Comptroller and Mayoral candidate John Liu has campaigned on the issue of legalizing cannabis for medical and non-medical purposes. Speaking at a press conference today he said, “Marijuana’s medical value is well-established, but it is still routinely denied to patients and researchers. It’s time for that to change, and New York City government can play a role in reshaping our understanding of marijuana’s medical uses. We should leverage our City’s tremendous medical, bioscience, and academic resources to lead the way in medical marijuana research in order to make a meaningful impact on suffering for years to come.”

    Full text of the Comptroller’s report is available here.

    13 Responses to “Report: Over 100,000 NYC Residents Could Benefit From Access To Medical Cannabis”

    1. markabley136 says:

      Good uses are given about medical marijuana in this blog, medical marijuana uses fro many disease like glaucoma,multiple sclerosis, chronic pain etc..

    2. shawn says:

      As another said, I don’t think it has near as much to do with medical as money, maybe defecits are a good thing, the huge budget gap nearly all states are facing along with the feds especially is forcing new alternatives to cover the bill. An extra 40 billion a yr(conservative estimates) is very hard to ignore, especially if the drug in question is known to be harmless compared to other Otc meds. The biggest problem I’ve seen so far, particularly in California. Is you can’t go halfway with it, it must be full blown buy it at the store legal, any less and it still allows a black market to thrive. The gateway drug theory always made me most angry, would those that claim it’s a gateway drug rather kids go straight into a gram a day coke habit? Mary just happen to be the first because it’s so available, in my opinion, you should be able to acquire whatever poison you’d like in store, people are going to do what they want, the best solution is to provide clean materials and a safe place. Legalizing removes the biggest attraction, forbidden fruit, it will always tempt, why not remove the forbidden fruit factor, after all I’m going to get what I want whether it’s through, over, or around you(speaking about people in general). I’d rather my kid be able to buy pot if he wants it without having crack pushed on him, or worrying about getting shot/robbed over a couple dollars, you know? Can’t control people, you may only contain them as best you can. There is no keep it out of kids hands, did your parents keep it out of yours, or did them trying just make your life even worse through stress and misunderstood workings, no drug is bad, it’s those around it that make it bad, the legal system makes it bad, before 1913, there was no problem, until the feds made it a problem, and used people’s ignorance against them. It’s really about time, I’d like to see all naturally occurring/unprocessed drugs legal, purely to remove the forbidden factor, along with the simple fact people will use whether it’s store bought or not, the latter is just more dangerous, let’s remove the danger, and crush the black market, they need to give people SOMETHING, alcohol is just too damaging for what it provides.

    3. Oliver Steinberg says:

      Sorry, it’s still just a dream and you’re still liable to be more pinched than you would care to be! Between these glimmers of hope, and actually regaining our freedom, stretches a long and difficult path. The powerful interests who oppose us will not roll over and surrender. They will contest every small increment of reform. As Fred Douglass said, “Power concedes nothing without a struggle.” We will not get legalization, we will not get personal-use cultivation, we will not get blanket pardon or amnesty for past cannabis convictions, just by hoping or wishing for them. Legalization will not fall out of the sky or materialize by magic. Our vision of freedom puts a lot of cops, prison guards, drug-testing racketeers, drug-company profiteers, liquor pushers, and professional busybodies out of work. They won’t go quietly. Do not sit back and wait for “the inevitable legalization.” That mistake was made in the 1970’s, and instead of legalization we got backlash–instigated and manipulated by precisely those interests who are jeopardized once again with the new public support for reform. It’s not inevitable. But it is possible, if we are more determined to stand up for our rights than we have been in the past. As many people as possible should “come out of the closet,” those who still fear they cannot do so should use their secret ballot to vote the way they smoke. And although there is dispute about the ethics of “outing” people, I think we should consider doing it to those in public life who conspicuously impede our issue despite their own past or present history of personal use or trafficking.

    Leave a Reply