<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; California Field poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/california-field-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California Tax Board Says Regulating Commercial Pot Sales Would Yield  $1.4 Billion Annually &#8212; Also Predicts Decline in Use of Booze and Tobacco</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/07/16/california-tax-board-says-regulating-commercial-pot-sales-would-yield-14-billion-annually-also-predicts-decline-in-use-of-booze-and-tobacco/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/07/16/california-tax-board-says-regulating-commercial-pot-sales-would-yield-14-billion-annually-also-predicts-decline-in-use-of-booze-and-tobacco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14 billion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Equalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Field poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Control Regulation and Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=1137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Editor's note: This post is excerpted from today's NORML weekly media advisory.] A revised budgetary analysis by the California State Board of Equalization (BOE) estimates that taxing and regulating the retail sale of cannabis by adults would raise approximately $1.4 billion in annual new state revenue. The BOE’s estimate, released late yesterday, assesses a $50 per ounce tax on the retail sale of cannabis (among other state-imposed costs), as recommended under Assembly Bill 390: The Marijuana Control, Regulation and Education Act.  This act seeks to license and tax the commercial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/cannabis_flower.jpg" alt="" width="198" height="260" />[<strong>Editor's note:</strong> This post is excerpted from today's NORML <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3442">weekly media advisory</a>.]</p>
<p>A revised budgetary <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j9P7paNzS32m_gMI8AAEkpvjXNWwD99F7TVO0">analysis</a> by the California State <a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/">Board of Equalization</a> (BOE) estimates that taxing and regulating the retail sale of cannabis by adults would raise approximately <strong>$1.4 billion in annual new state revenue</strong>.</p>
<p>The BOE’s estimate, released late yesterday, assesses a $50 per ounce tax on the retail sale of cannabis (among other state-imposed costs), as recommended under <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">Assembly Bill 390: The Marijuana Control, Regulation and Education Act</a>.  This <a href="http://legalizationwiki.org/Ammiano_Bill_AB_390">act</a> seeks to license and tax the commercial production, packaging, and retail sale of marijuana to those 21 years of age or older.</p>
<p>As introduced, AB 390 would <em>not</em> impose taxation or licensing requirements on the non-commercial production of cannabis (up to ten mature plants), or on the not-for-profit distribution of pot.  Further, the bill would <em>not</em> alter existing legislation on the use of medicinal cannabis, nor would it impose new taxes or sanctions on the medical cultivation of cannabis.</p>
<p>According to the BOE’s revised calculations, the enactment of AB 390 would raise an estimate <strong>$990 million annually</strong> from the proposed $50 per ounce levy on retail sales of marijuana in addition to another <strong>$392 million</strong> in yearly sales tax revenues.</p>
<p>The BOE assessment did not assess whether the enactment of AB 390 would reduce existing law enforcement and prosecutorial costs, which have been estimated by <a href="http://www.canorml.org">California NORML</a> to average some $200 million per year.  In 2007, a record <a href="http://www.canorml.org/news/2007arrests.html">74,000 Californians</a> were charged with marijuana offenses – the largest total since the state ‘decriminalized’ the personal possession of small amounts of marijuana in 1976.</p>
<p>The BOE report acknowledged that legalizing pot for adults <strong>would likely result in a “substitution effect” where consumers gravitate toward the use of marijuana “and away from cigarettes and alcohol.”</strong></p>
<p>According to a May 2009 <a href="http://field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/Rls2306.pdf">California Field poll</a> of 901 registered voters, <strong>56 percent</strong> of Californians say that lawmakers should “legalize marijuana for recreational use and tax its proceeds.”  Presently, the state is facing a $26 billion budget deficit.</p>
<p>Assembly Bill 390 is presently before the Assembly Committees on <a href="http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/newcomframeset.asp?committee=57">Public Safety</a> and <a href="http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/newcomframeset.asp?committee=10">Health</a>, which are expected to take up the issue early next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/07/16/california-tax-board-says-regulating-commercial-pot-sales-would-yield-14-billion-annually-also-predicts-decline-in-use-of-booze-and-tobacco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC News: Public&#8217;s Support For Pot Legalization Has Never Been Higher!</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/04/30/abc-news-publics-support-for-pot-legalization-has-never-been-higher/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/04/30/abc-news-publics-support-for-pot-legalization-has-never-been-higher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC News/Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Field poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana zeitgeist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation and Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Marijuana Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zogby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year, a NORML-commissioned national Zogby telephone poll revealed that a record 44 percent of American voters &#8212; including nearly six out of ten adults on the west coast &#8212; now believe that cannabis should be &#8220;taxed and legally regulated like alcohol and cigarettes.&#8221; Since then, several additional polls have confirmed that the nation&#8217;s support for legalizing marijuana has never been higher, and is fast approaching &#8220;super-majority status.&#8221; In fact, a recent poll sponsored by Oaksterdam University indicates that support for legalization among Californians has already achieved such vaulted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/wedgewood2009_sm.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" />Earlier this year, a NORML-commissioned <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7806">national Zogby telephone poll</a> revealed that <strong>a record 44 percent of American voters</strong> &#8212; including nearly six out of ten adults on the west coast &#8212; now believe that cannabis should be &#8220;taxed and legally regulated like alcohol and cigarettes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since then, several additional polls have confirmed that the nation&#8217;s support for legalizing marijuana <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/02/americans-growing-kinder-to-bud.html">has never been higher</a>, and is fast approaching &#8220;<a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/02/americans-growing-kinder-to-bud.html">super-majority status</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>In fact, a recent <a href="http://stash.norml.org/poll-californians-support-marijuana-legalization/">poll</a> sponsored by <a href="http://www.oaksterdamuniversity.com">Oaksterdam University</a> indicates that support for legalization among Californians has already achieved such vaulted status (well, almost).</p>
<p>Today two more polls are reaffirming America&#8217;s new &#8220;<a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/04/08/the-hill-america’s-new-marijuana-zeitgeist/">marijuana Zeitgeist</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>First, in California a new <a href="http://www.field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/Rls2306.pdf">Field Research Corporation poll</a> of 901 registered voters found that <strong>56 percent of voters agree with the statement: &#8220;Legalize marijuana for recreational use and  tax its proceeds.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>According to pollsters, this is the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/30/BA1417BHMA.DTL&amp;hw=marijuana&amp;sn=005&amp;sc=443">first time ever</a> in a California Field poll that a majority of voters have endorsed regulating the adult use of cannabis. In February, California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7814">introduced</a> legislation &#8212; <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">Assembly Bill 390</a>: The Marijuana Control, Regulation and Education Act &#8212; to tax the commercial production and retail sale of cannabis. To date, <strong>over 8,000 NORML supporters</strong> have contacted their state representatives in support of AB 390, which is expected to be taken up by the state Assembly early next year.</p>
<p>Nationally, a just-released ABC News/<em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Obama100days/story?id=7459488&amp;page=1">poll</a> of 1,072 adults finds that <strong>a record <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1089a6HotButtonIssues.pdf">46 percent</a> of all Americans now favor &#8220;legalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use.&#8221;</strong> This total is <em>more than double</em> the percentage of Americans who responded affirmatively (22 percent) to a similar ABC poll question in 1997!</p>
<blockquote><p>ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: HOT-BUTTON ISSUES<br />
via <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1089a6HotButtonIssues.pdf">ABCNews.go.com</a></p>
<p>46 percent of Americans now favor legalizing small amounts of marijuana for personal use, the most in data back to the mid-<br />
1980s and more than double its level 12 years ago. While 52 percent remain opposed, that’s down from 75 percent in the late 1990s and 78 percent in 1986.</p>
<p><strong>The biggest changes in the past two decades are 29- and 27-point advances in support for legalization among Democrats and independents</strong>, to 49 and 53 percent, respectively. The slightest: a 10-point gain among Republicans, to just 28 percent support.</p></blockquote>
<p>So much for the <a href="http://www.stopthedrugwar.com/chronicle_blog/2009/apr/23/opposing_medical_marijuana_is_po">myth</a> that supporting marijuana law reform is &#8216;politically suicidal.&#8217; In fact, if you are a politician &#8212; or <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7573">President</a> &#8212; whose constituency leans Democrat or Independent, <strong>it&#8217;s becoming increasingly likely that more of your supporters favor legalization over prohibition, and if you want to stay elected, you should too!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/04/30/abc-news-publics-support-for-pot-legalization-has-never-been-higher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>137</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

