<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Medical Marijuana&#8217;s Lost Man: Bryan Epis</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/07/medical-marijuanas-lost-man-bryan-epis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/07/medical-marijuanas-lost-man-bryan-epis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NORML Executive Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Epis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incarceration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priceline.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the best (or worse, it depends on one&#8217;s perspective and physical location!) indicators of the total failure of a law, is when it is woefully and subjectively applied.
When trying to answer inquiries from reporters, columnists, policymakers and medical cannabis patients regarding as to &#8216;why specifically has Bryan Epis been compelled to return to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best (or worse, it depends on one&#8217;s perspective and physical location!) indicators of the total failure of a law, is when it is woefully and subjectively applied.</p>
<p>When trying to answer inquiries from reporters, columnists, policymakers and medical cannabis patients regarding as to &#8216;why specifically has <a href="http://www.november.org/thewall/cases/epis-b/epis-b.html" target="_blank">Bryan Epis</a> been compelled to <em>return</em> to federal prison&#8211;at great taxpayer expense during a steep recession&#8211;when there are thousands of cannabusinesses operating at the retail level in states like California, Colorado and Montana?&#8217;, there are no satisfactory (or logical) answers to provide them.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.hr95.org/pix/epis.b02.jpg" alt="" width="245" height="223" /></p>
<p>Suffice of to say, Bryan Epis&#8217; case is both a dinosaur of sorts as well as a badge of shame for the current, and somewhat medical cannabis-supportive Obama administration in that his was one of the first federal arrests in 1997, and after a hotly contested legal battle, Bryan was one of the first medical cannabis primary caregivers to be sentenced under federal law, to <strong><em>ten</em></strong> years. After serving 24 months in prison from 2002-2004, with the greater social and political acceptance of medical cannabis blossoming around Bryan&#8217;s prison cell, he was able to procure an appeal bond, leave prison, argue his case in the appeals court again, re-start his successful business, pay taxes, take care of his mother, be a parent to his child, develop a loving relationship&#8211;all with the notion that he&#8217;d unlikely have to return to federal prison.</p>
<p>What, in the era of 24/7 medical cannabis vending machines, law enforcement having to return back hundreds of pounds of seized medical cannabis to patient-growers and caregivers, insurance companies paying on medical cannabis crop failure and insuring  dispensaries with standard business liability coverage and President Obama implementing the first steps of recognizing medical cannabis&#8217; safety, utility and need to change its legal status specifically-tailored for medical use?</p>
<p>Could the federal government be so arbitrary and capricious so as to seek his re-incarceration for eight more years to be served in prison, for the &#8216;crime&#8217; of growing over one hundred medical cannabis plants?</p>
<p>Yes. On <a href="http://www.canorml.org/temp/Epis_opinion.pdf" target="_blank">April 08, 2009</a>, a three panel judge on the 9th Circuit ruled against Epis and ordered him back to prison.</p>
<p>Bryan may have been arrested under the Clinton administration, prosecuted and incarcerated under the Bush 2.0 administration, but the Obama administration&#8217;s Department of Justice can &#8216;do the right thing&#8217;: stop wasting taxpayer&#8217;s money, stop being subjective in the application of the law and reason, and stop making the average person seriously question the priorities of government institutions and bureaucracies by immediately reducing his sentence, freeing him from a cage, and allow him to return to his family&#8211;<em>and</em> the tax rolls.</p>
<p>Below is a communication from Bryan&#8217;s partner regarding the <em>two</em> primary things citizens can do to support Bryan and help end this kind of insanity in the war against cannabis consumers:</p>
<p>1) Sign and distribute the <a href="http://www.bestlodging.com/politics/petition.doc" target="_blank">petition</a> necessary to appeal to the federal government to reduce Bryan&#8217;s sentence;</p>
<p>2) When booking lodging online, please use a search engine called <a href="http://lodgingsite.com" target="_blank">LodgingSite</a>, which not only benefits its owner (Bryan Epis!), but the company will donate 10% of their profit to public interest groups like NORML.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">March 4, 2010</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">Dear Allen,</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">My name is Monica and I am writing you on behalf of Bryan Epis. As you know they recently took him back in to serve the remainder of a ten year prison sentence.  He wanted me to contact you in hope that you can help us. I have attached a printable petition. Our goal is to come up with 100k signatures within 4 months.  The lawyer he has is filing a 2255 to try to get his sentence reduced. Bryan is hoping you will put this <a href="http://bestlodging.com/politics/petition.doc" target="_blank">petition</a> on your website, anyone can print it. It holds 25 signatures per page, once a page is complete, at the bottom of the page is our address. We ask that they send them back to me and I will take them to his lawyer.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><!--StartFragment--><span style="font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">We have found a way to raise money for your non-profit organization as well as help Bryan.</span></span></p>
<p>We have a website called <a href="http://www.lodgingsite.com" target="_blank">lodgingsite.com</a> powered by <a href="http://www.priceline.com" target="_blank">Priceline</a>.  It is a hotel reservation web site.  I would assume that all of your members, book at least one hotel a year, if they go to lodgingsite.com and book a hotel room under the “special rates” section.  We offer 10% cash back to any non profit organization of their choice (as long as when they get their confirmation info and send it to <span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">cashback@lodgingsite.com</span></span> along with a designated non profit organization of their choice. They must include the name of the organization of their choice, plus their confirmation number, their name address, the hotel name and city). BTW, 10% equates to about $20 per reservation. If you multiply that by how many members and supporters NORML has it is potentially a lot of money NORML could get for the cause, as well as to help and promote Bryan&#8217;s defense.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">If you have any questions please contact me at:<span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">monica@lodgingsite.com</span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">Sincerely,<br />
Monica Focht<br />
(in care of Bryan Epis) </span></span> <!--EndFragment--> <!--EndFragment--></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/07/medical-marijuanas-lost-man-bryan-epis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical marijuana&#8217;s not getting any better &#8211; the time for RE-legalization is NOW!</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/03/medical-marijuanas-not-getting-any-better-the-time-for-re-legalization-is-now/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/03/medical-marijuanas-not-getting-any-better-the-time-for-re-legalization-is-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Belville, NORML Outreach Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cannabis and the Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caregiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaucoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home grow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana law reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple sclerosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[possession limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author&#8217;s update: the graphics in the post below have been updated to correct some minor mistakes, such as dated information that left out Rhode Island and Maine&#8217;s dispensaries and Oregon&#8217;s recent acceptance of Alzheimer&#8217;s agitation as a qualifying condition.  Also, I have outlined Oregon&#8217;s attempt at legalization through the OCTA petition as it could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Author&#8217;s update: the graphics in the post below have been updated to correct some minor mistakes, such as dated information that left out Rhode Island and Maine&#8217;s dispensaries and Oregon&#8217;s recent acceptance of Alzheimer&#8217;s agitation as a qualifying condition.  Also, I have outlined Oregon&#8217;s attempt at legalization through the OCTA petition as it could be reasonably said to be as far along or farther along than Washington&#8217;s I-1068.  I regret my errors.</em></strong></p>
<div id="attachment_15808" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medipot-states-20101.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15808" title="medipot-states-2010" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medipot-states-20101-300x225.jpg" alt="Medipot States 2010 (March)" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Marijuana Law Reform in 2010 (March Update)</p></div>
<p>With New Jersey recently becoming the 14th medical marijuana state, activists in marijuana law reform have been celebrating.  After all, over 82 million Americans now live in states where medical use of marijuana is legal &#8211; that&#8217;s 27% of the US population! Last election, Massachusetts became the 13th decriminalization state, which means over 107 million Americans live in a state where possession of small personal amounts of marijuana no longer merit an arrest &#8211; that&#8217;s 35% of the US population.</p>
<div id="attachment_15809" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-1.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-15809 " title="medmj-stats-1" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-1-150x83.png" alt="Medical Marijuana Stats 1" width="150" height="83" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Population of States with Medical Marijuana Laws</p></div>
<div id="attachment_15810" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-2.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-15810" title="medmj-stats-2" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-2-150x75.png" alt="Medical Marijuana Stats 2" width="150" height="75" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Population of States that have Decriminalized Marijuana</p></div>
<p>However, after watching fourteen years of marijuana activism focused solely on those who use cannabis for medicine, I must warn activists that medical marijuana is not getting any better and the time for re-legalization of cannabis for all adults &#8211; even the healthy ones &#8211; is now.<br />
<div id="attachment_15811" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-3.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15811 " title="medmj-stats-3" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-3-300x140.png" alt="" width="300" height="140" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Comparison of five core rights found in existing medical marijuana law</p></div><br />
Medical marijuana was a great 20th century strategy to get the sick and dying off the battlefield in the war on drugs.  It was the perfect vehicle to enlighten the public, who for so long have been indoctrinated into the reefer madness that classifies cannabis like LSD and heroin.  But in the 21st century the idea that marijuana is <em>only</em> a medicine is beginning to take hold and governments and voters are crafting ever-more-restrictive medical marijuana laws.  For the vast majority of cannabis consumers this threatens to move us from the category of &#8220;illegal drug users&#8221; to &#8220;possessors of medicine without a prescription&#8221; &#8211; a step up, perhaps, but still left facing criminal prosecution.</p>
<p>California legalized medical marijuana in 1996.  That initiative, Prop-215, established what is clearly the most liberal medical marijuana statute to date:</p>
<ul>
<li>A doctor can recommend for any condition;</li>
<li>You needn&#8217;t have a &#8220;bona fide&#8221; doctor/patient relationship;</li>
<li>Dispensaries are allowed;</li>
<li>Self cultivation is allowed;</li>
<li>Patients are protected from arrest.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_15812" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-4.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15812" title="medmj-stats-4" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-4-300x207.png" alt="Medical Marijuana Stats 4" width="300" height="207" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Comparison of plant and possession limits and qualifying conditions in medical marijuana law</p></div>
<p>If we consider these five attributes of the law the baseline, then in the past fourteen years, all thirteen medical marijuana states that have followed have failed to achieve all five.  Eight states only offer three or four of those liberties and the rest offer two or only one.  Most disturbingly, the right of patients to grow their own medicine (or have a caregiver do it for them), which has been a bedrock principle in medical marijuana law, was taken away from patients in the most recent medical marijuana state, New Jersey.  Bills that were considered but vetoed in 2009 in Minnesota and New Hampshire, and those moving forward in New York, Pennsylvania, as well as an initiative in Arizona, all sacrifice this core right.</p>
<div id="attachment_15820" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/No-Garden-State.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-15820 " title="No Garden State" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/No-Garden-State-150x112.png" alt="No Garden State" width="150" height="112" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">New Jersey - The (No Medical Marijuana) Garden State</p></div>
<p>A comparison of plant and possession limits also shows the decline from the original starting point in California, where 12 plants and 8 ounces are allowed.  Oregon and Washington passed their laws next and have the highest statutory limits: 24 plants and 24 ounces in Oregon and 15 plants and 24 ounces in Washington.  (To be fair, all the West Coast states started with lower limits or more vague limits that were modified by the legislature.)  But since then, only one state has allowed more than 3 ounces (New Mexico with 6 ounces) and average number of plants allowed is a little less than ten.</p>
<div id="attachment_15813" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 309px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-5.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15813" title="medmj-stats-5" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-5-299x116.png" alt="Medical Marijuana Stats 5" width="299" height="116" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The &quot;Big 8&quot; Conditions for which marijuana is recommended in the states</p></div>
<p>Another decline in medical marijuana freedom appears when we look at the conditions for which medical marijuana protection is afforded in the various states.  There are eight conditions which could be considered the &#8220;standard&#8221; ones: cancer; HIV/AIDS; seizure disorders, like epilepsy; spastic disorders, like multiple sclerosis; glaucoma; chronic nausea; cachexia; and chronic pain.  Most medical marijuana states recognize all eight conditions; a couple (Vermont and Rhode Island) recognize seven of eight.</p>
<div id="attachment_15814" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-6.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15814 " title="medmj-stats-6" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/medmj-stats-6-300x134.png" alt="Medical Marijuana Stats 6" width="300" height="134" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Other conditions recognized in state medical marijuana laws (not a complete list)</p></div>
<p>The latest law in New Jersey, however, eliminated chronic pain, chronic nausea, and cachexia, making it the most restrictive list in the nation.  The bill proposed but vetoed in New Hampshire required one to try all other remedies for chronic pain before trying medical marijuana.  The vetoed Minnesota bill wouldn&#8217;t even allow cancer and HIV/AIDS patients to use medical marijuana unless they could show they were terminal (about to die).  The lists in the latest proposed bills continue to become more restricted.</p>
<p>Until we do have legalization for all, every medical marijuana law is going to fail to adequately serve all medical users and subject them to increasing restriction and scrutiny.  Additionally, medical marijuana laws make patients an attractive target for criminals because prohibition maintains huge profits for stolen medical cannabis, as well as becoming targets for overzealous anti-marijuana cops and prosecutors.</p>
<p><span id="more-2936"></span></p>
<p>The reason the recent medical marijuana laws are losing ground is not a failure of the medical marijuana strategy, but rather due to its success.  Medical marijuana has portrayed the herb as “powerful and effective medicine”.  Well, what do we do with powerful and effective medicines?  We keep them under lock and key.  We require people to visit doctors.  We strictly monitor prescription pads.  We bust people who have them without proper papers.</p>
<p>Rather than justifying the prohibitionists&#8217; shibboleth of medical marijuana as &#8220;the camel’s nose under the tent&#8221; for legalization, I’m arguing it’s the opposite: that continuing the medical marijuana strategy further cements the “powerful and effective medicine” frame and takes us farther away from treating cannabis as a personal choice of relaxant.  We’ll get to a point where the public accepts “powerful and effective cannabis medicine” and looks upon personal use like we look at someone getting fraudulent scrips for painkillers.</p>
<p>If one of the West Coast states doesn’t pull off legalization soon, the pendulum is going to swing back the other way on marijuana.  The economic incentives may fade if the economy recovers and then the tax &amp; regulate argument fizzles.  And if we are going to continue working on medical marijuana, the bills and initiatives need to get better, not worse.  The way it’s looking now is that the Northeast and upper Midwest are going to institute chronic conditions-only, 2 oz limit, strict registry, only personal doctor, no home grow, state-run dispensary medical marijuana for $15/gram in the next six years.  How then do we approach those people and say, “Hey, you know that powerful and effective medical marijuana that you only let a few hundred really sick people use after jumping though a mile of hoops?  We think everybody should have it and jump through no hoops!”</p>
<p>Medical marijuana would never have passed in any state if it were not for the votes of non-medical users of marijuana.  I do believe it is time for medical marijuana patients in the states that have programs to “repay the favor” and fight as hard for legalization as social tokers fought for medical.  Only patients can best make the argument that while prohibition exists, they will always face job discrimination, loss of child custody, high black market prices, housing discrimination, and the sneers of the Bill O’Reillys who think 99% of medical marijuana patients are faking.  So long as the prohibition profit exists, there will always be these <a href="http://stash.norml.org/cbs-los-angeles-hidden-camera-investigations-on-doctor-less-california-medical-marijuana-clinics">CBS Undercover investigations</a> casting a pall on all legitimate medical marijuana because of the irresponsible acts of a few.</p>
<p>Maybe I’m just too much of a dreamer.  I imagine acres and acres of hemp fields, huge indoor hydroponic cannabis warehouses, thriving cafes and coffeehouses, some folks growing their own in a garage or closet, regular outdoor festivals and special indoor events where cannabis smoking is permitted, buying and selling all varieties of cannabis from ounces at a farmer’s market to bulk bales at CostCo… and none of that is done with “powerful and effective medicines”.</p>
<p>I don’t think that it is reformer’s job to pass medical marijuana in all fifty states first and then worry about legalization in one.  I think states that have medical should be moving forward on legalization, states without should focus on better medical laws by calling prohibitionists’ bluff on “marijuana outta control!” in the Western states with liberal medical laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/03/medical-marijuanas-not-getting-any-better-the-time-for-re-legalization-is-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORML’s Weekly Legislative Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/02/19/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/02/19/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2254]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Pharmacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HF 2179]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-1068]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Initiative Amendment Act 0f 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawmakers around the country are debating a record number of marijuana law reform bills in 2010. NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up is your one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country, along with tips for influencing the policies of your state.
** A note to first time readers: NORML can not introduce legislation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORMLweed.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="318" />Lawmakers around the country are debating a record number of marijuana law reform bills in 2010. NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up is your one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country, along with tips for influencing the policies of your state.</p>
<p>** A note to first time readers: <strong>NORML can not introduce legislation in your state.</strong> Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation &#8216;by request&#8217;) can do so.  NORML can &#8212; and does &#8212; work closely with like-minded politicians and citizens to reform marijuana laws, and lobbies on behalf of these efforts. <strong>But ultimately the most effective way &#8212; and the only way &#8212; to successfully achieve statewide marijuana law reform is for local stakeholders and citizens to become involved in the political process and make the changes they want to see. </strong>We can&#8217;t do it without you.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>California:</strong> Democrat Assemblyman Tom Ammiano reintroduced legislation on Thursday that <strong>seeks to legalize the production, distribution, and personal use of marijuana</strong> for adults age 21 and older. <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_2251-2300/ab_2254_bill_20100218_introduced.html">Assembly Bill 2254</a>, the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act of 2010, would enact regulations governing the commercial production and retail sale of marijuana for adults.  The noncommercial cultivation of marijuana for personal use would <em>not</em> be subject to taxation under the proposal. In addition, AB 2254 would not alter existing legislation on the use of medicinal cannabis, nor would it impose new taxes or sanctions on the medical cultivation of cannabis.</p>
<p>In January, a previous version of this proposal (AB 390) was <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8080">approved</a> by the California Assembly, Committee on Public Safety.  <strong>The vote was the first time since 1913 that lawmakers had called for the repeal of cannabis prohibition.</strong> Further votes on AB 390 did not take place because of calendar restraints. To learn more about AB 2254, please visit NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/">here</a> or go to California NORML&#8217;s website <a href="http://www.canorml.org/news/AB2254.html">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Washington:</strong> Senate lawmakers <strong>failed to act</strong> this week on <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5615&amp;year=2009#documents">Senate Bill 5615</a>, <strong>which sought to reclassify minor marijuana possession offenses from a criminal misdemeanor to a fine-only civil infraction</strong>. Their inaction kills the bill for this legislative session.</p>
<p>In January, House lawmakers also <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/20/washington-lawmakers-vote-for-continued-chaos/">rejected a proposal</a> that sought to legalize and regulate marijuana production, sale, and use to those age 21 or older. Yet a January statewide <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704381604575005333978437228.html">poll</a> of 500 adults found that a solid majority of Washington voters support legalizing marijuana. As a result, <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=legal&amp;Group_ID=4571">NORML Legal Committee</a> member Douglas Hiatt, along with <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=4502">NORML Board Member Jeffrey Steinborn</a> and others are <a href="http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20100219/NEWS01/702199891">petitioning</a> to place the issue before state voters this November. <strong>To qualify for the ballot, organizers needs to turn in 241,153 valid signatures of registered voters to the Secretary of State&#8217;s Office on or before July 2.</strong> You can learn more about this effort <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14705531">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Washington, DC:</strong> Members of the DC <a href="http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/health">City Council’s Committee on Health</a> will hold their first hearing on implementing the District’s new <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/19/AR2010011902488.html">medical marijuana law</a> <strong>on Tuesday, February 23</strong>. Council members will hear testimony regarding <a href="http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/images/00001/20100120154529.pdf">B 18-622, the Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Initiative Amendment Act 0f 2010</a>, which seeks<strong> to implement local regulations regarding the medical use and distribution of medical marijuana</strong> to qualified patients. Representatives from NORML will be in attendance and testifying on behalf of the measure. You can read NORML’s written testimony to the Committee <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8099">here.</a> If you wish to attend this hearing, please go <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14635551">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>New Hampshire:</strong> House lawmakers will be spending part of their summer debating the merits of regulating adult marijuana use. In January members of the <a href="http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H26">House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee</a> heard testimony in favor of House Bill 1652, which sought to &#8220;allow [for] the purchase and use of marijuana by adults.&#8221; (Read NORML&#8217;s testimony to the Committee <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8085">here</a>.) On January 27, members of the Committee <a href="http://nhcommonsense.org/blog/committee_almost_approves_bill_tax_and_regulate_marijuana">voted 16-2 on a motion to refer the bill to a special interim study committee</a>. <strong>Members of the full House recently affirmed this amendment by a vote of 272 to 76, meaning that the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee will study the bill more thoroughly this summer</strong>, and it will issue recommendations for the following legislative session by November.</p>
<p><strong>Iowa:</strong> On Wednesday, February 17, the Iowa Board of Pharmacy <a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20100218/NEWS/2180358/1001/Pharmacy-board-supports-medical-marijuana">voted unanimously</a> in favor of <strong>reclassifying marijuana as a medicine under state law</strong>. (Note, this vote does <em>not</em> legalize the medical use of marijuana in Iowa.)</p>
<p>However, despite this latest decision from the Board, as well as a just-released statewide <a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20100216/NEWS/2160365/1001/NEWS/Iowa-Poll-Iowans-give-thumbs-up-to-medicinal-marijuana">poll</a> indicating that 64 percent of Iowans back legalizing marijuana for medical purposes, <a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20100217/NEWS/100217017/-1/NEWS04/Iowa-pharmacy-board-opens-door-for-medical-marijuana">news reports indicate</a> that <strong>lawmakers are not yet supportive</strong> of House File 2179, which seeks to <strong>legalize the physician-supervised use of cannabis</strong>. If you live in Iowa, please take time to contact your lawmakers <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14656481">here</a>.</p>
<p>For information on additional state and federal marijuana law reform legislation, <strong>please visit NORML’s ‘Take Action Center’</strong> <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/">here</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/02/19/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug War&#8217;s Underbelly Examined By National Public Radio</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/02/14/drug-wars-underbelly-examined-by-national-public-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/02/14/drug-wars-underbelly-examined-by-national-public-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cannabis and Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML Executive Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential informants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Public Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prohibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos to the producers and editors at National Public Radio for the second time in a week for examining parts of the drug war&#8217;s underbelly, notably the economics of cannabis under prohibition and the immense problems created in America&#8217;s criminal justice system by its over reliance on  informants.

Annually, over $30 billion in local, county, state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to the producers and editors at National Public Radio for the second time in a week for examining parts of the drug war&#8217;s underbelly, notably the <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123659362" target="_blank">economics of cannabis</a> under prohibition and the immense problems created in America&#8217;s criminal justice system by its over reliance on  <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123385312" target="_blank">informants</a>.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.wvgazette.com/static/series/snitches/SNCHLOGO.jpg" alt="" width="251" height="158" /></p>
<p>Annually, over <a href="http://stash.norml.org/msn-money-a-budget-cure-marijuana-taxes" target="_blank">$30 billion</a> in local, county, state and federal tax revenues don&#8217;t find their way to public tax coffers because the government continues to prohibit rather than tax cannabis-related businesses, products and services. To make matters worse, an estimated $300-$400 million is paid out annually by law enforcement to confidential informants and snitches.</p>
<p>Another Public Broadcast Corporation entity, the long-running documentary series <em>Frontline</em>, performed an important public service when it broadcast <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/snitch/" target="_blank">Snitch</a> in 1999.</p>
<p>In a free society guided by a constitution that secures numerous rights and privilege to individuals&#8211;with checks and balances on government power&#8211;the over reliance of <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2008/05/10/cannabis-does-not-kill-unfortunately-cannabis-prohibition-enforcement-can/" target="_blank">snitches</a> by American law enforcement is yet another terrible outgrowth attributable to a 73-year old public policy, cannabis prohibition, that has failed to the point where even greater government atrocities are justified to maintain the failed policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/02/14/drug-wars-underbelly-examined-by-national-public-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS News: &#8220;Pot Measure One Step Closer To California Ballot&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/29/cbs-news-pot-measure-one-step-closer-to-california-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/29/cbs-news-pot-measure-one-step-closer-to-california-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota Coalition for Compassion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax and regulate cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a general rule, NORML tends not to publicize or comment on ballot initiative drives &#8212; including campaigns we are involved in &#8212; until they have officially qualified for the ballot. But in this case, we (and the mainstream media) just couldn&#8217;t resist.
Pot Measure One Step Closer to California Ballot
via CBS.com
An initiative to make marijuana [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" />As a general rule, NORML tends <em>not </em>to publicize or comment on ballot initiative drives &#8212; including campaigns we are involved in &#8212; <strong>until they have officially qualified for the ballot</strong>. But in this case, we (and the mainstream media) just couldn&#8217;t resist.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/01/29/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6154282.shtml">Pot Measure One Step Closer to California Ballot</a></strong><br />
via CBS.com</p>
<p>An initiative to make marijuana legal, and open to local taxation and regulation, is one step closer to getting on the California ballot this November.</p>
<p>Backers of the <a href="http://www.taxcannabis.org/">initiative</a> on Thursday <strong>turned in nearly 700,000 signatures to state officials</strong> to place the measure on the state ballot, according to reports &#8212; <strong>far more than the 433,971 valid signatures required</strong>. California Secretary of State Debra Bowen has until June 24 to certify the initiative, the <em>Sacramento Bee</em> reports.</p>
<p>The measure, if approved by voters, <strong>would allow anyone over 21 years old to possess up to an ounce of marijuana or grow plants within a limited space for personal use</strong>. It would also allow local jurisdictions to tax and regulate it.</p>
<p>[<em>Author's Note: </em><em>There is a clause in the initiative that allows for municipalities, if they desire to do so, to establish regulations governing the retail distribution and sale of cannabis. </em><em>Personal, non-commercial possess or cultivation of marijuana would not be subject to taxation under this initiative.</em>]</p>
<p><strong>&#8230; An April Field Poll found that 56 percent of California voters supported legalizing marijuana</strong>, and Mark DiCamillo, the poll&#8217;s director, said the initiative had a 50 percent chance of passing, the <em>Los Angeles Times</em> reports.</p></blockquote>
<p>Next week, proponents of a <a href="http://www.sdcompassion.org/">statewide measure</a> to <strong>legalize medical marijuana in South Dakota</strong> will also <a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/617/south_dakota_medical_marijuana_initiative_signatures_hand_in">turn in signatures</a> to the Secretary of State&#8217;s office to place the proposal on the November 2010 ballot. Petitioners claim that they possess nearly twice the number of signatures necessary to qualify for the ballot.</p>
<p>Separate ballot drives are under way in several other states, including <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/190759.asp?from=blog_last3">Washington</a> and <a href="http://news.opb.org/article/6526-petition-drive-seeks-retail-pot-dispensaries/">Oregon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/29/cbs-news-pot-measure-one-step-closer-to-california-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming To A State House Near You: Legal Cannabis?</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/10/coming-to-a-state-house-near-you-legal-cannabis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/10/coming-to-a-state-house-near-you-legal-cannabis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A 804]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corzine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1177]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 2401]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Control Regulation and Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Steves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
UPDATE!!! UPDATE!!! WATCH THE WASHINGTON STATE HEARINGS LIVE HERE! 
January 2010 is off to a &#8217;smoking&#8217; start. Lawmakers in three key states &#8212; New Jersey, California, and Washington &#8212; are taking action this week on legislative measures that seek to significantly amend, or end, marijuana prohibition. Here&#8217;s a quick look at the week ahead.
Monday: [UPDATE [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" /></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE!!! UPDATE!!! WATCH THE WASHINGTON STATE HEARINGS LIVE <a href="http://www.tvw.org/media/LiveTemplates/LivePlayer.cfm?evid=2010010080&#038;ccode=C&#038;CFID=3941302&#038;CFTOKEN=88688809&#038;bhcp=1">HERE</a>! </strong></p>
<p>January 2010 is off to a &#8217;smoking&#8217; start. Lawmakers in three key states &#8212; <strong>New Jersey, California, and Washington</strong> &#8212; are <strong>taking action this week</strong> on legislative measures that seek to significantly amend, or end, marijuana prohibition. Here&#8217;s a quick look at the week ahead.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Monday: [UPDATE 3!!! The New Jersey State Assembly and Senate have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/nyregion/12marijuana.html?hp">approved </a>the “New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act" </strong>(A804/S119).  Governor Jon Corzine is expected to <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/01/nj_lawmakers_approve_bill_lega.html">sign the legislation into law</a> this week. The measure is expected to take effect in six months, at which time <strong>New Jersey will become the 14th state in the nation to legalize medical marijuana</strong>. Major thanks go out to Ken Wolski and Jim Miller of  <a href="http://www.cmmnj.org/">Coalition for Medical Marijuana -- New Jersey</a>, and to <a href="http://www.normlnj.org">NORML New Jersey</a>'s Chris Goldstein. Without their efforts it is unlikely that this victory would be upon us today.]</p>
<p><strong><strong>Tuesday: [<strong>UPDATE!!! I have just returned from Sacramento and wanted to confirm to folks that AB 390 did pass out of Committee by a <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/12/BA191BH4AR.DTL&amp;tsp=1">4-3 vote</a>. A google news search under the key words "marijuana" and "California" with yield plenty of media coverage, with much more to come.</strong>] </strong></strong>Members of the California Assembly, Public Safety Committee will <a href="http://www.kcbs.com/pages/6030654.php?">vote on </a><a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">Assembly Bill 390, the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act</a>, which seeks to regulate and control the production, distribution, and personal use of marijuana for adults age 21 and older. This vote will mark the first time since 1913, when California became one of the first states in the nation to enact cannabis prohibition, that lawmakers have reassessed this failed policy. (See my op/ed in today&#8217;s <em>Sacramento Bee</em> <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/2449105.html">here</a>.) <strong>A press conference is anticipated to take place immediately following the vote. </strong>You can read NORML’s <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8077">prepared testimony here</a> and <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7999">here</a>, and you can voice your support for this effort by going <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong><strong>Wednesday: </strong><strong>Washington state House lawmakers <a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/01/07/pot-bills-advance-in-olympia">will hear testimony</a> at 1:30pm in favor of a pair of bills seeking to significantly reduce state marijuana penalties. </strong></strong>Members of the <a href="http://www.leg.wa.gov/house/committees/PSEP/Pages/default.aspx">House Committee on Public Safety &amp; Emergency Preparedness</a> will debate two pending proposals, House Bill 1177 and House Bill 2401. House Bill 1177 seeks to reclassify the possession of forty grams or less of marijuana from a misdemeanor to a class 2 civil infraction punishable by a $100 fine. <strong><strong>House Bill 2401 seeks to &#8220;remove all existing civil and criminal penalties for adults 21 years of age or older who cultivate, possess, transport, sell, or use marijuana.&#8221;</strong> </strong>This will be the first time state lawmakers have ever debated regulating marijuana production, distribution, and use by adults.</p>
<p><strong>NORML representatives will be testifying in Olympia on Wednesday (Read testimony <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8079">here</a>.), and <strong>NORML Advisory Board member Rick Steves</strong> will also be <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/190339.asp">hosting a public forum on the topic at Olympia&#8217;s Capitol Theater</a> on Tuesday evening. </strong>If you live in Washington, you can urge the Committee to vote &#8216;yes&#8217; on one or both of these measures by going <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14429351">here</a> and <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14513586">here</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>For information on additional state and federal marijuana law reform legislation, please visit NORML’s ‘Take Action Center’ <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/10/coming-to-a-state-house-near-you-legal-cannabis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/06/normls-weekly-legislative-round-up-22/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/06/normls-weekly-legislative-round-up-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1652]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 2401]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Control Regulation and Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s January 2010, and that means it is time once again for NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up &#8212; your one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country, along with tips for influencing the policies of your state.
** A note to first time readers: NORML can not introduce legislation in your state. Nor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORMLweed.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="318" />It&#8217;s January 2010, and that means it is time once again for NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up &#8212; your one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country, along with tips for influencing the policies of your state.</p>
<p>** A note to first time readers: <strong>NORML can not introduce legislation in your state.</strong> Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation &#8216;by request&#8217;) can do so.  NORML can &#8212; and does &#8212; work closely with like-minded politicians and citizens to reform marijuana laws, and lobbies on behalf of these efforts. <strong>But ultimately the most effective way &#8212; and the only way &#8212; to successfully achieve statewide marijuana law reform is for local stakeholders and citizens to become involved in the political process and make the changes they want to see. </strong>We can&#8217;t do it without you.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>California:</strong> <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/05/california-historic-vote-on-cannabis-regulation-to-take-place-on-tuesday-january-12/">Reminder</a> &#8212; On <strong>Tuesday, January 12</strong>, members of the California Assembly will <a href="http://www.kcbs.com/Lawmakers-to-Consider-Legalizing-Marijuana/6030654">decide</a> on <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">Assembly Bill 390, the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act</a>, which seeks to regulate and control the production, distribution, and personal use of marijuana for adults age 21 and older. <strong>Tuesday’s vote will mark the first time since 1913</strong>, when California became one of the first states in the nation to enact cannabis prohibition,<strong> that lawmakers have reassessed this failed policy</strong>. You can read NORML&#8217;s prepared testimony <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8077">here</a>, and if you live in California it is pertinent that you <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">call or fax your Assembly member</a> this week by going <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>New Hampshire:</strong> A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers today introduced<strong> the state&#8217;s first ever bill to legalize and &#8220;regulate the purchase and use of marijuana&#8221; for adults</strong>. As introduced, <strong>House Bill 1652</strong> &#8220;allows [for] the purchase and use of marijuana by adults (age 21 or older), regulates the purchase and use of marijuana, and imposes taxes on the wholesale and retail sale of marijuana.&#8221; Personal possession of up to one ounce of cannabis and/or non-commercial cultivation of up to three marijuana plants would <strong>not</strong> be subject to tax and regulation under this act. You can read the full text of the measure <a href="http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/hb1652.html">here</a>, and you can urge your politicians to support HB 1652 by going <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14513666">here</a>. (FYI: A separate bill seeking to decriminalize minor marijuana possession, <a href="http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/hb1653.html">HB 1653</a>, is also <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14521131">pending</a> in the New Hampshire legislature.)</p>
<p><strong>Washington:</strong> [<strong>UPDATE!!!</strong> Members of the <a href="http://www.leg.wa.gov/house/committees/PSEP/Pages/default.aspx">House Committee on Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness</a> <strong>will hear testimony in favor of both marijuana legalization and decriminalization bills on Wednesday, January 13, at 1:30pm</strong>. Please see NORML's 'Current Action Alerts page <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/">here</a> for more info.] Legislators have pre-filed <strong>House Bill 2401</strong>, which seeks to &#8220;<strong>remove all existing civil and criminal penalties for adults 21 years of age or older who cultivate, possess, transport, sell, or use marijuana</strong>.&#8221; You can read the full text of the proposal <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=2401&amp;year=2009">here</a>, and you can show your support for the measure by going to NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14513586">here</a>. (FYI: Separate decriminalization legislation also remains pending, and may be supported by going <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14429351">here</a>.)</p>
<p><strong>New Jersey:</strong> Time is running out to make New Jersey the fourteenth state to legalize the therapeutic use of marijuana for qualified patients.  <strong>Lawmakers are <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-29881-Philadelphia-NORML-Examiner~y2010m1d6-NJ-Medical-marijuana-bill-posted-for-final-vote-public-support-urged">scheduled to vote</a> </strong>on the <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14522196">New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act</a> on <strong>Monday, January 11</strong>.  This is the <strong>final day</strong> that lawmakers will be voting on issues from the 2008-2009 legislative session. This means that the bill must pass the Assembly floor, and then be rectified with the Senate version of the bill, before it can be sent to outgoing Gov. John Corzine for his approval. If you reside in New Jersey then it is vital that you take action this week by going <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14522196">here</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>For information on additional state and federal marijuana law reform legislation, please visit NORML’s <strong>&#8216;Take Action Center&#8217;</strong> <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/06/normls-weekly-legislative-round-up-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California: Historic Vote On Cannabis Regulation To Take Place On Tuesday, January 12</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/05/california-historic-vote-on-cannabis-regulation-to-take-place-on-tuesday-january-12/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/05/california-historic-vote-on-cannabis-regulation-to-take-place-on-tuesday-january-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ammiano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capwiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Control Regulation and Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, January 12, members of the California Assembly will hold a historic vote on statewide marijuana policy.  Members of the Public Safety Committee  will decide on Assembly Bill 390, the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act,  which seeks to regulate and control the production, distribution, and personal use of marijuana for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>Tuesday, <a href="http://www.kcbs.com/Lawmakers-to-Consider-Legalizing-Marijuana/6030654">January 12</a></strong>, members of the California Assembly will hold a <strong>historic <a href="http://www.kcbs.com/Lawmakers-to-Consider-Legalizing-Marijuana/6030654">vote</a></strong> on statewide marijuana policy.  <strong>Members of the Public Safety Committee  will decide on </strong><a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896"><strong>Assembly Bill 390</strong>, the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act</a>,  which seeks to regulate and control the production, distribution, and personal use of marijuana for adults age 21 and older.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>[UPDATE from Russ Belville:</strong> NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano and MPP's California director Aaron Smith join me this afternoon's <a href="http://stash.norml.org">NORML SHOW LIVE</a>, airing at 1pm Pacific / 4pm Eastern, to discuss this historic vote in California.  Call in with your questions to 347-994-1810]<br />
<embed src="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/BTRPlayer.swf" flashvars="file=http://www.blogtalkradio.com%2fnorml%2fplay_list.xml&#038;autostart=false&#038;shuffle=false&#038;callback=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/FlashPlayerCallback.aspx&#038;width=210&#038;height=105&#038;volume=80&#038;corner=rounded" width="210" height="105" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" wmode="transparent" menu="false" allowScriptAccess="always"></embed></p></blockquote>
<p>Tuesday&#8217;s vote will mark the first time since 1913, when California became one of the first states in the nation to enact cannabis prohibition, that lawmakers have reassessed this failed policy.</p>
<p>If a majority of the <a href="http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/newcomframeset.asp?committee=57">Public Safety Committee</a> votes &#8216;yes&#8217; on AB 390, the bill will immediately face a separate vote in the <a href="http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/newcomframeset.asp?committee=10">California State Assembly Committee on Health</a>. (I have been tentatively invited to testify before this committee; you can read my prepared testimony <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8077">here</a>.) In short, <strong>members of both committees will likely be voting on this historic measure next week</strong>.  That is why <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">we need your support in contacting the members of these legislative committees</a> today!</p>
<p>To date, over 8,000 of you have <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">contacted your California Assemblymembers</a> via NORML&#8217;s Capwiz <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/?style=D">&#8216;Take Action&#8217; Center</a>.  This is a tremendous outpouring of public support, <strong>but we need to ramp up our advocacy before next week&#8217;s vote</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>If you reside in California please <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">click here</a> to find a list of Assembly members who sit on the key committees overseeing AB 390. Constituents in their districts are urged to phone or fax support their for AB 390 today. </strong>Lawmakers&#8217; district phone numbers, fax numbers, and e-mail contact information appears <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">here</a>.</p>
<p>If your member of the Assembly does not appear on this list, please take a moment this week to call and leave a polite, concise phone message voicing your support for AB 390 with the Assembly Committees of Public Safety and Health.  You can find the direct line for these committees, as well as for their Chair and Vice-Chairs, <a href="http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/newcomframeset.asp?committee=57">here</a> and <a href="http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/newcomframeset.asp?committee=10">here</a>.</p>
<p>Finally, Californians can also send a letter of support directly to their individual member of the Assembly by using NORML&#8217;s pre-written letter service <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Let&#8217;s begin 2010 by letting California&#8217;s politicians know that the time to end the state&#8217;s nearly 100-year failed experiment with marijuana prohibition is now!</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RDKarCeC_Ic&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RDKarCeC_Ic&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/05/california-historic-vote-on-cannabis-regulation-to-take-place-on-tuesday-january-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORML Director: Amazing 2009! Awesome 2010 Ahead!</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/31/norml-director-amazing-2009-awesome-2010-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/31/norml-director-amazing-2009-awesome-2010-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NORML Executive Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Help Support NORML&#8217;s End of Year Drive &#8211; Donate Now 
Dear NORML Supporter: 
It is not often that I feel  compelled to write to NORML&#8217;s membership and supporters regarding the  day-to-day operations of America&#8217;s  leading marijuana lobby group. Then again, in my tenure as Executive Director  of NORML and the NORML [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Help Support NORML&#8217;s End of Year Drive &#8211; <a href="https://secure.norml.org/donate/">Donate Now</a></strong> </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Dear NORML Supporter: </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">It is not often that I feel  compelled to write to NORML&#8217;s membership and supporters regarding the  day-to-day operations of America&#8217;s  leading marijuana lobby group. Then again, in my tenure as Executive Director  of NORML and the NORML Foundation, <strong>there&#8217;s  never been a time like right now</strong>.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Over the past several months  NORML&#8217;s public prominence and political influence has grown by leaps and bounds. <strong>As I write you today I&#8217;m reflecting upon  two of the most significant &ndash; and productive &ndash; weeks in NORML history.&nbsp; </strong>As we close the year 2009 I am proud to  say that NORML has galvanized its position as the <em>leading</em> marijuana law reform organization. <em>Why do I say this</em>?&nbsp; Take a  look at the events of these two weeks late this fall, and decide for yourself:</font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><img src="http://norml.org/images/about/tax_day_protest.jpg" width="130" height="195" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right"></strong></font></p>
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Marijuana legalization  in Massachusetts?  NORML testifies &#8216;<em>Yes</em>!&#8217;</strong> <br />
    On Wednesday, October 14, NORML&#8217;s  Legal Counsel Keith Stroup and NORML Advisory Board Member Dr. Lester Grinspoon <strong><a href="http://stash.norml.org/testimony-at-massachusetts-legalization-hearing" target="_blank">testified</a> before the Massachusetts Joint  Committee on Revenue in favor of House Bill 2929, &#8216;An Act to Regulate and Tax  the Cannabis Industry.&#8217; </strong>Members of NORML&#8217;s state affiliate, MassCann,  also spoke on behalf of the measure, which was drafted by former NORML Board  Member Richard Evans. The well-attended legislative hearing marked the <strong><em>first  time</em></strong> that Massachusetts  state legislators had ever publicly discussed legalizing marijuana, and the  debate earned prominent media coverage throughout the state.&nbsp;</p>
<p>  </font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>California  Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger requests  marijuana  legalization debate </strong><br />
    In May Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger  publicly called for a <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7868">debate</a> on the merits of marijuana regulation. This  October NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano and CalNORML Coordinator  Dale Gieringer obliged the Governor&#8217;s request, and provided<strong> his office with a comprehensive action plan for regulating marijuana production and distribution in California.</strong></p>
<p>  </font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Obama to  Justice Department: Back off on medi-pot prosecutions</strong><br />
      <strong><img src="http://norml.org/images/med_mj_map_poster.gif" width="240" height="313" hspace="6" vspace="4" align="right"></strong>On Monday, October 19, U.S. Deputy  Attorney General David Ogden <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7998">issued a historic memorandum</a> to federal  prosecutors advising them to <strong>no  longer &quot;focus federal resources &hellip; [on those] whose actions are in &hellip; compliance  with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.&quot;</strong> The directive upheld a campaign promise by President Obama, who had <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvUziSfMwAw" target="_blank">pledged</a> that he would not use &quot;Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state  laws.&quot; Ever since the President took office NORML and other drug policy reform  groups had lobbied the administration to follow through, in writing, with this  sensible policy. Tellingly, the administration&#8217;s decision was hailed by the  mainstream media as a major step toward the enactment of marijuana  liberalization in America.  Not surprisingly, NORML representatives spent the days immediately following  the administration&#8217;s announcement speaking with dozens of mainstream media  outlets, including CNN, MSNBC, <em>The  Associated Press</em>, and <em>The Christian  Science Monitor, </em>urging Congress to<strong><em> move expeditiously to make the  administration&#8217;s policy changes into permanent law</em></strong>.</p>
<p>  </font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Mainstream  media just can&#8217;t get enough pot</strong><br />
  Over the past month NORML has  fielded multiple requests from producers at mainstream media, radio, and  television outlets throughout the nation and the world. Notably, NORML&#8217;s staff  participated in the production of Fox Business News weeklong series on the  cannabis industry (air date October 19-23), <em>Newsweek</em>&#8217;s  five-part series on present and past marijuana policy (published October 16),  and the October 14 edition of PBS&#8217; News Hour with Jim Leher.&nbsp; NORML has also recently received prominent  coverage in periodicals such as the BBC, <em>The  Wall Street Journal</em>, and <em>Fortune  Magazine</em>. Unlike in past years &ndash; or even past months &ndash; the overall tone of  all of these high profile features was favorable to marijuana law reform.&nbsp; The underlying media message: <strong>marijuana is a commodity, not a moral  threat, and it&#8217;s about time for America&#8217;s  laws to start treating it that way</strong>.</p>
<p>  </font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>The Drug  Czar&#8217;s office comes calling</strong> <br />
  On Monday, October 24 &ndash; at the  request of the White House &ndash; I participated in a strategic conference call with  Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske to discuss the drafting of the administration&#8217;s 2010  National Drug Control Strategy. <em>You read  that right</em>: <strong>the Office of  National Drug Control Policy reached out to NORML and requested NORML&#8217;s  participation in crafting the administration&#8217;s future drug reform strategies</strong>.  Yes, the same office that just one year ago inflicted the cannabis community  with John Walters is now making house calls to NORML. </p>
<p>  My friends, the times are most  definitely changing.</p>
<p>  </font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>NORML  testifies at California  Assembly hearings on legalization</strong><br />
    Finally, to conclude two of my  busiest weeks ever as NORML and NORML Foundation Director, on Wednesday,  October 28, NORML&#8217;s Paul Armentano and Dale Gieringer <strong>traveled to Sacramento to <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7999">testify</a> before  the California  Assembly on Public Safety to urge legislators to stop arresting responsible  marijuana smokers</strong>.&nbsp; &quot;The criminal  prohibition of marijuana has not dissuaded anyone from using marijuana or  reduced its availability; however, the strict enforcement of this policy has  adversely impacted the lives and careers of millions of people who simply  elected to use a substance to relax that is objectively safer than alcohol,&quot;  Armentano told the Committee. <em>&quot;NORML  believes that the state of California ought to amend criminal prohibition and  replace it with a system of legalization, taxation, regulation, and education.&quot;</em> Like in Massachusetts two weeks earlier, the  day-long hearing and was the first of its kind to take place before the California legislature.</font></li>
</ul>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">So there you have it: two weeks in the life of NORML and the  NORML Foundation.&nbsp; <strong>Thank you for being there for us &ndash; so we can be there for you.</strong></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">As we conclude this momentous year I rest assured knowing  that with your continued <a href="https://secure.norml.org/donate/">financial contributions</a><strong>, NORML and the NORML Foundation will be able to maintain its position  as the most trusted and respected marijuana law reform organizations in the United States</strong>.&nbsp; That remains our commitment to you &ndash; the  cannabis consumer &ndash; as we look ahead to the success and victories that await us  in 2010. </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>With your  generous support, we are ending marijuana prohibition.</strong> <strong>With your  continued generous support, we&#8217;ll end marijuana prohibition once and for all.</strong></font>
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>Cannabem liberemus</em>,</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Allen St. Pierre<br />
  Executive Director</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><em>P.S.</em></strong> Please make your  <a href="https://secure.norml.org/donate/">tax-deductible donation</a> to the <strong>NORML  Foundation</strong> in support of our national outreach and educational programs.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">If  you&#8217;d rather your <a href="https://secure.norml.org/donate/">donation</a> be employed for state and federal lobbying purposes,  please make sure that the donation is directed to &#8216;<strong>NORML</strong>&#8216;, where donations are <u>not</u> tax deductible.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><em>P.P.S.</em></strong> <a href="https://secure.norml.org/donate/">Donate</a> $50 or more to either  NORML Foundation (or NORML) and receive a copy of the new book &#8216;<em><a href="http://www.marijuanaissafer.com/" target="_blank">Marijuana is Safer, so why are we driving  people to drink?</a></em>&#8216; co-authored by NORML deputy director Paul Armentano.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/31/norml-director-amazing-2009-awesome-2010-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009: The Year In Review – NORML&#8217;s Top 10 Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Field poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head and neck cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measure F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ogden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OR NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schedule I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zogby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#1 Obama Administration: Don&#8217;t Focus On Medical Marijuana Prosecutions
United States Deputy Attorney General David Ogden issued a memorandum to federal prosecutors in October directing them to not &#8220;focus federal resources &#8230; on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.&#8221; The directive upheld [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_freetheprisoners.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="287" /><strong>#1 Obama Administration: Don&#8217;t Focus On Medical Marijuana Prosecutions</strong><br />
United States Deputy Attorney General David Ogden issued a <a href="http://blogs.usdoj.gov/blog/archives/192">memorandum</a> to federal prosecutors in October directing them to not &#8220;focus federal resources &#8230; on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.&#8221; The directive upheld a campaign promise by President Barack Obama, who had previously <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvUziSfMwAw">pledged</a> that he was &#8220;not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7998">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#2 Public Support For Legalizing Pot Hits All-Time High</strong><br />
A majority of U.S. voters now support legalizing marijuana, according to a <a href="http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/34651/most_americans_support_legalizing_marijuana">national poll</a> of 1,004 likely voters published in December by Angus Reid. The Angus Reid Public Opinion poll results echo those of separate national polls conducted this year by <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7996">Gallup</a>, <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7806">Zogby</a>, <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/04/30/abc-news-publics-support-for-pot-legalization-has-never-been-higher/">ABC News</a>, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/02/americans-growing-kinder-to-bud.html">CBS News</a>, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/02/americans-growing-kinder-to-bud.html">Rasmussen Reports</a>, and the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/30/BA1417BHMA.DTL&amp;hw=marijuana&amp;sn=005&amp;sc=443">California Field Poll</a>, each of which reported greater public support for marijuana legalization than ever before. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8054">here</a>.<br />
<strong><br />
#3 Lifetime Marijuana Use Associated With <em>Reduced</em> Cancer Risk</strong><br />
The moderate long-term use of cannabis is associated with a reduced risk of head and neck cancer, according to the results of a population-based control study published in August by the journal <em>Cancer Prevention Research</em>. Authors <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19638490">reported</a>, &#8220;After adjusting for potential confounders (including smoking and alcohol drinking), 10 to 20 years of marijuana use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7944">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#4 AMA Calls For Review Of Marijuana&#8217;s Prohibitive Status</strong><br />
In November, the American Medical Association resolved that marijuana should longer be classified as a Schedule I prohibited substance. Drugs classified in Schedule I are <a href="http://www.justice.gov/dea/pubs/abuse/1-csa.htm#Schedule%20I">defined</a> as possessing &#8220;no currently accepted use in treatment in the United States.&#8221; In a separate action, the AMA also <a href="http://americansforsafeaccess.org/downloads/AMA_Report.pdf">determined</a>, &#8220;Results of short term controlled trials indicate that smoked cannabis reduces neuropathic pain, improves appetite and caloric intake especially in patients with reduced muscle mass, and may relieve spasticity and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8020">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#5 California: Lawmakers Hold Historic Hearing On Marijuana Legalization</strong><br />
State lawmakers heard <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7999">testimony</a> in October in support of taxing and regulating the commercial production and distribution of cannabis for adults age 21 and older. Additional hearings, <strong>as well as a vote</strong> on <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896#at">Assembly Bill 390: the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act</a>, <strong>are scheduled for January 12, 2010</strong>. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8002">here</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-2504"></span></p>
<p><strong>#6 Maine Voters Approve Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Measure; Dispensaries Coming To Rhode Island, Washington, DC In 2010</strong><br />
Voters in November decided in favor of a statewide <a href="http://www.mainepatientsrights.org/Petition%20MEDICAL%20MARIJUANA.pdf">measure</a> that allows for the state to license non-profit facilities to distribute medical cannabis to qualified patients. The vote marked the first time that citizens ever approved a statewide ballot proposal authorizing the creation of dispensaries. In June, Rhode Island lawmakers <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7901">enacted</a> a similar measure. In December, Congress <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7901">lifted</a> federal restrictions to allow for the DC City Council to implement provisions of a ten-year-old medical marijuana law that would allow for the use and distribution of medicinal cannabis in the District of Columbia. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8011">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#7 Oakland: Voters Approve First-In-The-Nation Medical Marijuana Business Tax</strong><br />
In July 80 percent of municipal voters approved <a href="http://www.smartvoter.org/2009/07/21/ca/alm/meas/F/">Ballot Measure F</a>, the nation&#8217;s first ever business tax on the retail sales of cannabis. The tax, which takes effect on January 1, imposes an exclusive tax for &#8220;cannabis businesses&#8221; of $18 for every $1,000 of gross receipts. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7937">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#8 Rasmussen Poll: Majority Of Americans Say Marijuana Is Safer Than Alcohol</strong><br />
More than half of American adults believe that alcohol is &#8220;more dangerous&#8221; than marijuana, according to the results of a national telephone <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/august_2009/51_rate_alcohol_more_dangerous_than_marijuana">poll</a> of 1,000 likely voters published in September by Rasmussen Reports. Fifty-one percent of respondents, including a majority of women, rated the use of marijuana to be less dangerous than alcohol. Only 19 percent of those polled said that cannabis is the more dangerous of the two substances. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7965">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#9 Many Teens See Medical Cannabis As Alternative Treatment Option</strong><br />
Some one-third of adolescents view their use of marijuana as therapeutic rather than recreational, according to survey data <a href="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/7">published</a> in May by the journal <em>Substance Abuse, Treatment, Prevention and Policy</em>. Teens most commonly reported using cannabis therapeutically to counter symptoms of depression, stress and anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), physical pain, and sleeplessness. In November several mainstream media <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/23/parents-treating-children-with-medical-marijuana-cited-in-mainstream-media/">outlets</a>, including <em>The New York Times</em> and Good Morning America, featured stories on adolescents using marijuana as a medicine. Read the full story <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/23/parents-treating-children-with-medical-marijuana-cited-in-mainstream-media/">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#10 Oregon NORML Opens &#8216;Cannabis Café,&#8217; Media Frenzy Follows</strong><br />
In November <a href="http://www.ornorml.org/">Oregon NORM</a>L <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8024">opened</a> the state&#8217;s first café catering to state-authorized medical marijuana patients. Unlike conventional marijuana dispensaries that operate in states like California and Colorado, medical cannabis is not sold on the premises, nor is the primary function of the café to dispense marijuana. &#8220;This is not a medical marijuana dispensary with a café; this is a café for medical marijuana patients,&#8221; said <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7522">Madeline Martinez</a>, Oregon NORML Executive Director. <em>The Associated Press</em>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5AD06O20091114"><em>Reuters</em></a>, <em><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-11-23-cannibis-oregon_N.htm">USA Today</a></em>, <em><a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/americas-first-cannabis-cafe-open/">The New York Times</a></em>, and <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/portlands_cannabis_cafe_is_the_first">Democracy Now</a> were among the hundreds of media outlets that covered the story. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8024">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
