<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; Colorado</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/colorado/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department Formally Threatens State-Licensed Colorado Cannabis Providers</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2012/01/12/justice-department-formally-threatens-state-licensed-colorado-cannabis-providers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2012/01/12/justice-department-formally-threatens-state-licensed-colorado-cannabis-providers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAW ENFORCEMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=7962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December I blogged about rumors that the Obama Justice Department was finalizing plans to expand its recent crackdown on medical cannabis producers and providers to include state-licensed facilities in Colorado. Today, the federal government made good on its threats. According to numerous media reports, federal authorities today issued warning letters to 23 state-licensed dispensaries in Colorado stating that &#8220;action will be taken to seize and forfeit their property&#8221; if they continue operating within 1,000 feet of a school. The letters, sent by U.S. Attorney John Walsh, say that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/DEAlogo.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="217" />In December I <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/14/the-next-state-in-the-federal-governments-crosshairs-is-colorado/">blogged</a> about rumors that the Obama Justice Department was finalizing plans to expand its <a href="http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/should-federal-authorities-be-able-to-close-medical-marijuana-dispensaries-in-california/obama-should-keep-promise-on-medical-marijuana">recent crackdown</a> on medical cannabis producers and providers to include state-licensed facilities in Colorado. Today, the federal government made good on its threats.</p>
<p>According to numerous <a href="http://www.dailycamera.com/boulder-county-news/ci_19728612">media reports</a>, federal authorities today issued warning letters to 23 state-licensed dispensaries in Colorado stating that &#8220;action will be taken to seize and forfeit their property&#8221; if they continue operating within 1,000 feet of a school. The <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/78076178/U-S-Attorney-John-Walsh-Redacted-Letter-to-Medical-Marijuana-Dispensary">letters</a>, sent by U.S. Attorney John Walsh, say that the dispensaries have 45 days from today to close shop or face federal sanction.</p>
<p>It states, in part:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Federal law prohibits the manufacture, distribution, and possession of marijuana. &#8230; (This) dispensary is operating in violation of federal law, and the department of Justice has the authority to enforce federal law <strong><em>even when such activities may be permitted under state law</em></strong>. Persons &#8230; who operate or facilitate the operation of such dispensaries are subject to criminal prosecution and civil enforcement actions under federal law. Moreover, because the dispensary is operating within 1,000 feet of a school, enhanced federal penalties apply.</p>
<p>&#8230; This letter &#8230; constitutes formal notice that action will be taken to seize and forfeit (your) property if you do not cause the sale and/or distribution of marijuana and marijuana-infused substances at (this) location to be discontinued.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>While the federal government in recent months has <a href="http://norml.org/news/2011/10/13/department-of-justice-announces-stepped-up-enforcement-efforts-targeting-california-medical-cannabis-providers">utilized similar tactics to close down cannabis providers in California</a> and has also coordinated DEA-led raids of dispensaries in other states, most notably in <a href="http://norml.org/news/2011/11/17/justice-department-raids-several-washington-state-cannabis-dispensaries">Washington</a> and <a href="http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/greatfallstribune/access/2513267281.html?FMT=ABS&amp;date=Nov+16%2C+2011">Montana</a>, today&#8217;s efforts mark the first time that the federal authorities have specifically targeted facilities that are operating explicitly under a state license. (To date, only officials in the states of Colorado, Maine, and New Mexico have formally issued licenses to authorized cannabis providers.) It is estimated that that some <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/invest/stocks/marijuana-a-half-baked-investment-idea/">700 state licensed dispensaries are presently operating</a> in Colorado.</p>
<p>Once again, the federal government&#8217;s actions belie the administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/08/medical-marijuana-federal-interference_n_1137745.html">claim</a> that it only intends to target those medical cannabis operators that “use marijuana in a way that’s not consistent with the state statute.” In this case, the operations in question were grandfathered in under local or state regulations. They are acting in compliance with state law and explicitly with the state&#8217;s permission.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, the imprimatur of the state apparently carries little if any weight with the Obama administration, whose first priority in Colorado appears to be matters of zoning enforcement.</p>
<p>Legislating medical marijuana operations and prosecuting those who act in a manner that is inconsistent with state law and voters’ sentiment should be a responsibility left to the state and local officials, not the federal government. <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=58723501">It is time for this administration to fulfill the assurances it gave to the medical cannabis community</a> and to respect the decisions of voters and lawmakers in states that recognize its therapeutic efficacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2012/01/12/justice-department-formally-threatens-state-licensed-colorado-cannabis-providers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Next State In The Federal Government&#8217;s Crosshairs Is Colorado</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/14/the-next-state-in-the-federal-governments-crosshairs-is-colorado/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/14/the-next-state-in-the-federal-governments-crosshairs-is-colorado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=7619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent months, the federal Justice Department has engaged in concerted efforts to crack down on the proliferation of medical cannabis related activities in states that allow for its therapeutic use under state law, including California, Montana, and Washington. Now, according to a CBS News report, the next state on the federal government&#8217;s &#8216;hit list&#8217; is Colorado &#8212; arguably the state with the most comprehensive and stringent statewide regulations governing medical cannabis activities. These regulations explicitly license state-authorized cannabis dispensaries, of which there are now some 700 operating statewide. Nonetheless, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/DEAlogo.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="217" />In recent months, the federal Justice Department has engaged in <a href="http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/should-federal-authorities-be-able-to-close-medical-marijuana-dispensaries-in-california/obama-should-keep-promise-on-medical-marijuana">concerted efforts to crack down</a> on the proliferation of medical cannabis related activities in states that allow for its therapeutic use under state law, including <a href="http://norml.org/news/2011/10/13/department-of-justice-announces-stepped-up-enforcement-efforts-targeting-california-medical-cannabis-providers">California</a>, <a href="http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20111116/NEWS01/111116017/">Montana</a>, and <a href="http://norml.org/news/2011/11/17/justice-department-raids-several-washington-state-cannabis-dispensaries">Washington</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Now, according to a CBS News <a href="http://denver.cbslocal.com/video?autoStart=true&amp;topVideoCatNo=default&amp;clipId=6546995">report</a>, the next state on the federal government&#8217;s &#8216;hit list&#8217; is Colorado &#8212; arguably the state with the most comprehensive and stringent statewide <a href="http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/hs/medicalmarijuana/">regulations</a> governing medical cannabis activities.</strong> These regulations <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2010/06/07/colorado-explicitly-authorizes">explicitly license</a> state-authorized cannabis dispensaries, of which there are now some <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/invest/stocks/marijuana-a-half-baked-investment-idea/">700 operating statewide</a>.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, the imprimatur of the state apparently carries little if any weight with the Obama administration at this time &#8212; despite <a href="http://stash.norml.org/medical-marijuana-raid-raises-question-whats-obama-policy">promises</a> (<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/08/medical-marijuana-federal-interference_n_1137745.html">reiterated before Congress just last week</a> by US Attorney General Eric Holder) that such prosecutions are &#8220;not a (federal) priority&#8221; and that the Justice Department only intends to target those entities who &#8220;use marijuana in a way that&#8217;s not consistent with the state statute.&#8221;</p>
<p>Predictably, today&#8217;s CBS special report tells a different story.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://denver.cbslocal.com/2011/12/14/crackdown-on-colorados-medical-pot-business-on-the-horizon/">Crackdown On Colorado’s Medical Pot Business On The Horizon</a></strong><br />
<em>via CBS News Denver</em></p>
<p>Federal authorities are planning to crack down on the medical marijuana business in Colorado on a large scale for the first time.</p>
<p>Warning letters will be going out to dispensaries and grow facilities near schools, CBS4 investigator Rick Sallinger has learned. So far it’s not clear how soon that will happen.</p>
<p><strong>Dispensaries that receive the letters will be given 45 days to shut down or move operations. If they don’t comply, they will be shut down by the U.S. attorney in Colorado.</strong></p>
<p>The dispensaries who are set to be targeted are the ones that are located within 1,000 feet of schools. That measurement is being used because that distance already appears in federal law as a factor in drug crime sentencing.</p>
<p>The move comes after the Justice Department sent out a memo clarifying that marijuana has been and remains illegal under federal law despite what has taken place with state regulations. Colorado is one of 16 states where medical marijuana laws have been approved.</p>
<p>Many of the state’s dispensaries that are closer than 1,000 feet to a school have already been approved to be there under local laws. They usually have been grandfathered in.</p>
<p>&#8230; Robert Corry, an attorney who represents dispensaries, said medical marijuana operations are now strictly regulated under Colorado state laws.</p>
<p>“The federal apparatus here has better things to do,” said Corry. “My reaction would be the federal government is essentially declaring war on the voters of our state (who) passed a Constitutional amendment.”</p>
<p>U.S. attorneys in California recently announced in a separate medical marijuana crackdown that they would be targeting landlords who rent retail space to dispensaries, as well as dispensary owners themselves.</p></blockquote>
<p>Does anyone really believe that this is an appropriate use of scarce federal resources? Or that these actions are in any way consistent with Obama&#8217;s public pledge <strong>to cease utilizing &#8220;Justice Department resources to try and circumvent state laws on this issue?&#8221; </strong>I didn&#8217;t think so.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>If the federal government is truly concerned about the diversion of<br />
medical marijuana or its potential abuse in states that have authorized it then it would be better served to encourage &#8212; rather than to discourage &#8212; statewide and local efforts to regulate these actions accordingly. The Obama administration’s enforcement actions in California, Colorado, and elsewhere will only result in limiting adults’ regulated, safe access to cannabis therapy. It will also cost local jobs and needed tax revenue, and likely result in hundreds &#8212; if not thousands &#8212; of unnecessary criminal prosecutions.</p>
<p>Legislating medical marijuana operations and prosecuting those who act in a manner that is inconsistent with state law and voters’ sentiment should be a responsibility left to the state and local officials, not the federal government. <strong>It is time for this administration to fulfill the assurances it gave to the medical cannabis community and to respect the decisions of voters and lawmakers in states that recognize its therapeutic efficacy.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/14/the-next-state-in-the-federal-governments-crosshairs-is-colorado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressman Polis&#8217; Grills Attorney General Holder About Fed&#8217;s Medical Marijuana Policies</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/08/congressman-polis-grills-attorney-general-holder-about-feds-medical-marijuana-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/08/congressman-polis-grills-attorney-general-holder-about-feds-medical-marijuana-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LITIGATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCIENCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Jared Polis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=7593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Huffington Post article and C-Span video. I’ve spoken to two reporters today inquiring about Colorado Congressman Jared Polis’ medical cannabis-related questions to Attorney General Holder at a congressional committee hearing that was otherwise a ‘bloodbath’ for Holder—getting grilled about the guns and Mexico fiasco—when Polis, who is not a member of the Judiciary Committee, was allowed to ask Holder two questions about medical cannabis enforcement. Generally written&#8230; Polis first wanted assurances that Colorado&#8217;s medical cannabis dispensaries/cultivation centers compliant with state laws—unlike California&#8217;s medical cannabis businesses that are not regulated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/08/medical-marijuana-federal-interference_n_1137745.html" target="_blank"><em>Huffington Post</em></a> article and C-Span video.</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DCNutE9nUVk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>I’ve spoken to two reporters today inquiring about Colorado Congressman <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2011/04/08/congressman-jared-polis-just-as-the-policy-of-prohibition-failed-nationally-with-alcohol-its-now-up-to-states-and-counties-i-think-we-should-do-the-same-with-marijuana/" target="_blank">Jared Polis’</a> medical cannabis-related questions to Attorney General Holder at a congressional committee hearing that was otherwise a ‘bloodbath’ for Holder—getting grilled about the<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/08/us-congress-holder-idUSTRE7B72FQ20111208" target="_blank"> guns and Mexico fiasco</a>—when Polis, who is not a member of the Judiciary Committee, was allowed to ask Holder two questions about medical cannabis enforcement.</p>
<p>Generally written&#8230;</p>
<p>Polis first wanted assurances that Colorado&#8217;s medical cannabis dispensaries/cultivation centers compliant with state laws—unlike California&#8217;s medical cannabis businesses that are not regulated by the state—are <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2011/10/07/federal-government-announces-escalation-of-its-war-on-cannabis/" target="_blank">not a Department of Justice (DOJ) target</a>. Holder affirmed the basic tenets of the previous <a href="http://norml.org/news/2009/10/22/doj-to-federal-prosecutors-do-not-focus-resources-on-medical-marijuana" target="_blank">Ogden</a> and <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2011/07/01/latest-doj-memo-emphasizes-why-we-must-pass-hr-2306-the-ending-federal-marijuana-prohibition-act-of-2011/" target="_blank">Cole</a> memos, and wouldn’t provide assurances, but, re-iterated the DOJ stance that enforcing medical cannabis laws, notably in a state like Colorado with its rules and regulations, and with limited federal resources at hand, is a low law DOJ enforcement priority.</p>
<p>The second Polis question was about <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/106620/lack-of-financial-services-putting-mmj-businesses-in-a-bind" target="_blank">banking and medical cannabis businesses in Colorado</a>, where he pushed Holder to acknowledge that the DOJ is not placing a priority on interfering with state compliant medical cannabis businesses and banking concerns.</p>
<p>I assume there will be news and industry coverage later today and tomorrow about this unexpected, but informative exchange between Representative Polis and Attorney General Holder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/08/congressman-polis-grills-attorney-general-holder-about-feds-medical-marijuana-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current TV: Marijuana Prohibition In America Examined Tonight</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/11/28/current-tv-marijuana-prohibition-in-america-examined-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/11/28/current-tv-marijuana-prohibition-in-america-examined-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCIETY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African-Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonshine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prohibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The War on Weed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weed Wars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=7505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The award-winning (and totally watchable) Vanguard series from Current TV examines Cannabis Prohibition in America tonight at 9PM (eastern) in &#8216;The War on Weed&#8217; with not only an obligatory review* of western states&#8217; medical cannabis laws (including California, Colorado and Washington), but, more notable for NORML, is the documentary&#8217;s critical review and juxtaposition to the western United States ongoing experiment with allowing medical access to cannabis&#8211;and the general cultural and political acceptance for cannabis in most of the western states&#8211;to that of the decidedly anti-cannabis attitudes and law enforcement practices [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The award-winning (and totally watchable) Vanguard series from <a href="http://current.com/shows/vanguard/">Current TV </a>examines Cannabis Prohibition in America tonight at 9PM (eastern) in <a href="http://current.com/shows/vanguard/episodes/season-five/the-war-on-weed/">&#8216;The War on Weed&#8217;</a> with not only an obligatory review* of western states&#8217; medical cannabis laws (including California, Colorado and Washington), but, more notable for NORML, is the documentary&#8217;s critical review and juxtaposition to the western United States ongoing experiment with allowing medical access to cannabis&#8211;and the general cultural and political acceptance for cannabis in most of the western states&#8211;to that of the decidedly anti-cannabis attitudes and law enforcement practices for decades in supposedly &#8216;liberal&#8217; and &#8216;tolerant&#8217; <a href="http://stash.norml.org/new-york-city-marijuana-arrests-top-50k-86-minorities">New York City</a>, where 50,000 cannabis consumers a year are arrested, about ninety percent black and Latino.</p>
<p>*Obligatory, because starting at 10PM (eastern) on December 1st is the Discovery Channel&#8217;s <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/weed-wars-sneak-peek-weed-wars.html">Weed Wars</a>, a new series that looks at the fine legal line between compassion and big commerce regarding California&#8217;s medical cannabis industry.</p>
<p>Contrastingly, Discovery Channel is also premiering that same week a new series called <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/moonshiners-moonshiners-sneak-peek.html">Moonshiners</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/11/28/current-tv-marijuana-prohibition-in-america-examined-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Casualty In Obama&#8217;s War On Pot: The First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/10/14/latest-casualty-in-obamas-war-on-pot-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/10/14/latest-casualty-in-obamas-war-on-pot-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alt-weeklyies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=7283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The First Amendment is the latest casualty of the Obama Administration&#8217;s stepped up war on cannabis. On Wednesday, the US Attorney for the southern district of California, Laura Duffy, announced her intent to target media outlets &#8212; in particular alt-weeklies like the San Diego Reader and the San Francisco Bay Guardian &#8212; that accept advertising dollars from medical cannabis operations. Feds to target newspaper, radio marijuana ads via California Watch U.S. Attorney Laura E. Duffy, whose district includes Imperial and San Diego counties, said marijuana advertising is the next area [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/DEAlogo.jpg" class="alignright" width="225" height="217" />The First Amendment is the latest casualty of the Obama Administration&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2011/10/07/federal-government-announces-escalation-of-its-war-on-cannabis/">stepped up war on cannabis</a>. </p>
<p>On Wednesday, the US Attorney for the southern district of California, Laura Duffy, <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/san_francisco&#038;id=8389979">announced her intent to target media</a> outlets &#8212; in particular alt-weeklies like the <em>San Diego Reader</em> and the <em>San Francisco Bay Guardian</em> &#8212; that accept advertising dollars from medical cannabis operations.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong><a href="http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/feds-target-newspapers-radio-marijuana-ads-13049">Feds to target newspaper, radio marijuana ads</a></strong></p>
<p><em>via California Watch</em></p>
<p>U.S. Attorney Laura E. Duffy, whose district includes Imperial and San Diego counties, said marijuana advertising is the next area she&#8217;s &#8220;going to be moving onto as part of the enforcement efforts in Southern California.&#8221; Duffy said she could not speak for the three other U.S. attorneys covering the state but noted their efforts have been coordinated so far.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not just seeing print advertising,&#8221; Duffy said in an interview with California Watch and KQED. &#8220;I&#8217;m actually hearing radio and seeing TV advertising. It&#8217;s gone mainstream. <strong>Not only is it inappropriate – one has to wonder what kind of message we&#8217;re sending to our children – it&#8217;s against the law.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; Duffy said she believes the law gives her the right to prosecute newspaper publishers or TV station owners.</p>
<p>&#8220;If I own a newspaper &#8230; or I own a TV station, and I&#8217;m going to take in your money to place these ads, I&#8217;m the person who is placing these ads,&#8221; Duffy said. <strong>&#8220;I am willing to read (the law) expansively and if a court wants to more narrowly define it, that would be up to the court.&#8221;</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whether or not Duffy&#8217;s unconventional interpretation of federal law has any legal merit is, of course, beside the point. Her intent is to create a climate of fear that is so pervasive that media outlets &#8216;willingly&#8217; cease accepting advertising revenue from dispensaries and other like-minded business. </p>
<p>Such threats are nothing new for the federal government, which in recent months has successfully utilized similar tactics<a href="http://www.krdo.com/news/29363567/detail.html"> to coerce state and local banks to drop their accounts with state-sanctioned marijuana-related businesses</a> and <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2011/10/pot-clubs-san-francisco-receive-threatening-notes-feds">to intimidate landlords</a> who rent their properties to tenants involved in medical cannabis facilities. </p>
<p>Yet despite the government&#8217;s heavy-handed behavior, California bureaucrats <a href="http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2011/10/12/why-are-harris-newsom-and-other-pols-silent-federal-pot-crackdown">have remained largely &#8212; and disappointingly &#8212; silent</a> regarding the Justice Department&#8217;s intimidatory tactics. <strong>That is why it is more important than ever that you send the Obama Administration a clear and consistent message <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=54512501">here</a>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/10/14/latest-casualty-in-obamas-war-on-pot-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week in Weed: September 11th &#8211; 17th</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/09/16/this-week-in-weed-september-11th-17th/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/09/16/this-week-in-weed-september-11th-17th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Altieri, NORML Communications Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEGISLATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LITIGATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCIETY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Freedom Rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerlikowske]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[normltv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ONDCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[per se]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week in weed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=7044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now streaming on NORMLtv is the latest episode of “This Week in Weed.” This Week: a congressman calls upon Drug Czar Kerlikowse to reschedule marijuana, per se THC limits for drugged driving stall out in Colorado, and the biggest marijuana rally on the east coast is about to commence. Be sure to tune in to NORMLtv each Thursday afternoon to catch up on the latest marijuana news. Subscribe to NORMLtv or follow us on Twitter to be notified as soon as new content is added.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://norml.tv"><img src="http://blog.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/thisweeknew-300x204.jpg" alt="This Week in Weed" title="thisweeknew" width="300" height="204" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6850" /></a>Now streaming on <a href="http://www.norml.tv">NORMLtv</a> is the latest episode of “This Week in Weed.” </p>
<p>This Week: a congressman calls upon Drug Czar Kerlikowse to reschedule marijuana, per se THC limits for drugged driving stall out in Colorado, and the <a href="http://masscann.org">biggest marijuana rally</a> on the east coast is about to commence.</p>
<p>Be sure to tune in to <a href="http://www.norml.tv">NORMLtv </a>each Thursday afternoon to catch up on the latest marijuana news. Subscribe to NORMLtv or follow us on <a href="http://twitter.com/normltv">Twitter</a> to be notified as soon as new content is added.</p>
<p><iframe height=100px src="http://www.youtube.com/subscribe_widget?p=NatlNORML"<br />
       style="overflow: hidden; height: 105px; width: 300px; border: 0;"<br />
       scrolling="no" frameBorder="0"><br />
    </iframe></p>
<p><iframe width="495" height="274" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wTNT0DRr1vY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/09/16/this-week-in-weed-september-11th-17th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASCAR Again Shows Bias Against Marijuana By Suspending Driver Who Legally Uses Medical Cannabis</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/24/nascar-again-shows-bias-against-marijuana-by-suspending-driver-who-legally-uses-medical-cannabis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/24/nascar-again-shows-bias-against-marijuana-by-suspending-driver-who-legally-uses-medical-cannabis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCIENCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCIETY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASCAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronnie Hults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Edson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=6877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent and unfortunate suspension of Ronnie Hults, a NASCAR driver from Colorado who is a lawful medical cannabis patient&#8212;along with the recent rejection of a NASCAR car sponsored by Cannabis Planet&#8212; would seem to affirm a clear bias that the auto racing organization has against cannabis and cannabis consumers. And this from an organization like NASCAR&#8230;.with its well established roots in the illegal trafficking of untaxed alcohol (i.e., Moonshine) post-Prohibition in America&#8217;s southeastern states; a major promoter of tobacco products for decades; and current major billboard for the pharmaceutical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent and unfortunate <a href="http://www.9news.com/news/article/215192/339/NASCAR-driver-suspended-for-med-marijuana-use-">suspension of Ronnie Hults</a>, a NASCAR driver from <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Colorado" target="_blank">Colorado</a> who is a lawful medical cannabis patient&#8212;along with the <a href="http://stash.norml.org/cannabis-planet-not-allowed-on-nascar-las-weekend">recent rejection of a NASCAR car sponsored by <em>Cannabis Planet</em></a>&#8212; would seem to affirm a clear bias that the auto racing organization has against cannabis and cannabis consumers.<img class="alignright" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_KctRKZkuqQ0/S602NOFISHI/AAAAAAAAAOw/8XtlS0C0WjI/s1600/cannabis+planet+tv+nascar.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="240" /></p>
<p>And this from an organization like NASCAR&#8230;.with its well established roots in the illegal trafficking of untaxed alcohol (i.e., Moonshine) post-Prohibition in America&#8217;s southeastern states; a major promoter of tobacco products for decades; and current major billboard for the pharmaceutical industry to promote their drugs.</p>
<p>There appears to be no allegations of Mr. Hults driving while under the influence of medical cannabis and as <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=legal&amp;Group_ID=4526" target="_blank">NLC member from Denver Warren Edson</a> wryly observes: &#8216;What&#8217;s the problem here, all these guys have to do is turn left?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/24/nascar-again-shows-bias-against-marijuana-by-suspending-driver-who-legally-uses-medical-cannabis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legalization Week: Oregon, California, Colorado, Washington Activists on Ballot Initiatives for 2012</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/19/legalization-week-oregon-california-colorado-washington-activists-on-ballot-initiatives-for-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/19/legalization-week-oregon-california-colorado-washington-activists-on-ballot-initiatives-for-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Belville, NORML Outreach Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEGISLATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LITIGATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=6857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week on NORML SHOW LIVE we took a look at four states where activists are proposing multiple ballot initiatives to legalize&#8230; or &#8220;sensibly regulate&#8221;&#8230; marijuana for all adults, even healthy ones. We covered Oregon, California, Colorado, and Washington, click the Full Story link below to get the lineup of interviewees and videos. Join us online for our live coverage this weekend at Seattle Hempfest.  We have interviews scheduled with Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn, Councilman Nick Licata, City Attorney Pete Holmes, Washington Rep. Roger Goodman, Washington Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_25025" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/NORML-SHOW-LIVE-Stacked1.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-25025" title="NORML SHOW LIVE Stacked" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/NORML-SHOW-LIVE-Stacked1-150x117.png" alt="" width="150" height="117" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Weekdays 1pm, 4pm, and 10pm Pacific, on http://live.norml.org</p></div>
<p>This week on <a href="http://live.norml.org">NORML SHOW LIVE</a> we took a look at four states where activists are proposing multiple ballot initiatives to legalize&#8230; or &#8220;sensibly regulate&#8221;&#8230; marijuana for all adults, even healthy ones. We covered Oregon, California, Colorado, and Washington, click the Full Story link below to get the lineup of interviewees and videos.</p>
<p>Join us online for <a href="http://live.norml.org">our live coverage this weekend</a> at <a href="http://hempfest.org">Seattle Hempfest</a>.  We have <a href="http://hempfest.org/drupal/speakers">interviews scheduled with</a> Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn, Councilman Nick Licata, City Attorney Pete Holmes, Washington Rep. Roger Goodman, Washington Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson, and US Congressman Dennis Kucinich, plus <a href="http://hempfest.org/drupal/speakers">all the activist luminaries and performing artists</a> we can snag!  Check out our <a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/HEMPFEST-2011.pdf">NORML Stage Schedule</a> for more info.</p>
<p><a href="http://stash.norml.org/legalization-week-oregon-california-colorado-washington-activists-on-ballot-initiatives-for-2012">Watch the Legalization Week interviews here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/19/legalization-week-oregon-california-colorado-washington-activists-on-ballot-initiatives-for-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s One Million Legalized Marijuana Users</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Belville, NORML Outreach Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAMILIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dale Gieringer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Lichty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Coast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=6077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Least 1 &#8211; 1.5 Million Americans are Legal Medical Marijuana Patients Market for these patients in sixteen states and D.C. estimated at between $2 &#8211; $6 billion annually MAY 31, 2011 - We don&#8217;t know his or her name, but somewhere in one of sixteen states and the District of Columbia is America&#8217;s 1,000,000th legal medical marijuana patient. We estimate the United States reached the million-patients mark sometime between the beginning of the year to when Arizona began issuing patient registry identification cards online in April 2011. Between one to one-and-a-half million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>At Least 1 &#8211; 1.5 Million Americans are Legal Medical Marijuana Patients</strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Market for these patients in sixteen states and D.C. estimated at between $2 &#8211; $6 billion annually</em></strong></p>
<p>MAY 31, 2011 - We don&#8217;t know his or her name, but somewhere in one of sixteen states and the District of Columbia is <strong>America&#8217;s 1,000,000th legal medical marijuana patient.</strong> We estimate the United States reached the million-patients mark sometime between the beginning of the year to when <a href="http://stash.norml.org/arizona-medical-marijuana-program-opens-first-online-only-registration">Arizona began issuing patient registry identification cards online in April 2011</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_23836" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Marijuana-States-of-America-2011-05-Full.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-23836" title="Marijuana States of America - 2011-05 Full" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Marijuana-States-of-America-2011-05-Full-150x93.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="93" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">16 states, the Capitol, and ONE MILLION legal marijuana users.</p></div>
<p>Between one to one-and-a-half million people are legally authorized by their state to use marijuana in the United States, according to data compiled by NORML from state medical marijuana registries and patient estimates.  Assuming usage of one-half to one gram of cannabis medicine per day per patient and an <a href="http://www.priceofweed.com/">average retail price of $320 per ounce</a>, <strong>these legal consumers represent a $2.3 to $6.2 billion dollar market annually.</strong></p>
<p>Based on state medical marijuana laws, the amounts of cannabis these legal marijuana users are entitled to possess means there is between 566 &#8211; 803 thousand pounds of legal usable cannabis <em>allowed under state law</em> in America.  These patients are allowed to cultivate between 17 &#8211; 24 million legal cannabis plants.  There may possibly be more, as California and New Mexico &#8220;limits&#8221; may be exceeded with doctor&#8217;s permission and some California counties explicitly allow greater amounts, so <strong>there may be as much as 1 million pounds of state-legal cannabis <em>allowed under state law</em> in America.</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#cccccc">
<td><strong><a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391">Active Medical Marijuana State</a> </strong>(Total population of sixteen medical marijuana states + D.C. = over 90 million.  D.C., Delaware, and New Jersey programs are not yet active.)</td>
<td># Legal Medical Marijuana Patients (% of state population)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>California </strong>(1996) - No central state registry, 2% &#8211; 3% of overall population estimate by Dale Gieringer at California NORML by comparing rates in Colorado &amp; Montana.</td>
<td>~<strong>750,000 </strong>(2.00%)</p>
<p><em>~1,125,000 (3.00%)</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Washington </strong>(1998) - No registry, 1% &#8211; 1.5% of overall population estimate by Russ Belville at NORML by comparing rates in Oregon &amp; Colorado.</td>
<td>~<strong>67,000</strong> (1.00%)</p>
<p><em>~100,000 (1.50%)</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Oregon </strong>(1998) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://public.health.oregon.gov/DISEASESCONDITIONS/CHRONICDISEASE/MEDICALMARIJUANAPROGRAM/Pages/data.aspx">39,774</a> </strong>(1.04%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Alaska </strong>(1998) - No data online, verified by author&#8217;s call to Alaska Bureau of Vital Statistics.</td>
<td><strong>380 </strong>(0.05%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Maine </strong>(1999) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/dlrs/reports/mmm-program-report-3-2011.pdf">796</a> </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Nevada </strong>(2000) - 2008 figures from ProCon.org, awaiting return call from state for official number.</td>
<td><strong>860 </strong>(0.03%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Hawaii </strong>(2000) - Estimate from Pam Lichty of Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii; program is run by law enforcement who are reluctant to release data.</td>
<td>~<strong>8,000 </strong>(0.59%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colorado </strong>(2000) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/hs/medicalmarijuana/statistics.html">123,890</a> </strong>(2.46%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Vermont </strong>(2004) - No data online, verified by author&#8217;s call to Vermont Criminal Information Center.</td>
<td><strong>349 </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Montana </strong>(2004) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/medicalmarijuana/MMPRegistryInformation.pdf">30,609</a> </strong>(3.09%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Rhode Island </strong>(2006) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.health.ri.gov/publications/programreports/MedicalMarijuana2011.pdf">3,069</a> </strong>(0.29%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>New Mexico </strong>(2007) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.health.state.nm.us/IDB/medicalcannabis/Medical%20Cannabis%20Numbers%20as%20of%205-5-11.pdf">3,615</a> </strong>(0.18%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Michigan</strong> (2008) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.michigan.gov/lara/0,1607,7-154-27417_51869---,00.html">75,521</a> </strong>(0.76%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Arizona </strong>(2010) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.azdhs.gov/medicalmarijuana/documents/reports/110524_Patient-Application-Report.pdf">3,696</a> </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>TOTAL US LEGAL MARIJUANA USERS</strong></td>
<td>~<strong>1,100,000 </strong>(1.22%)</p>
<p><em>~1,500,000 (1.67%)</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Yet after fifteen years, one million patients, and a million pounds of legal marijuana, few if any of the dire predictions by opponents of medical marijuana have come to fruition.  Medical marijuana states like Oregon are experiencing their <a href="http://stash.norml.org/oregon-reports-lowest-rates-of-workplace-illness-and-injury-ever-recorded">lowest-ever rates of workplace fatalities, injuries, and accidents</a>.  States like Colorado are experiencing their <a href="http://stash.norml.org/denver-posts-editorial-board-raises-reefer-madness-fears-of-stoned-drivers">lowest rates in three decades of fatal crashes per million miles driven</a>.  In <a href="http://www.ukcia.org/research/ImpactOfStateMMJLaws.pdf">medical marijuana states for which we have data</a> (through Michigan in 2008), use by minor teenagers is down in all but Maine and down by at least 10% in states with the greatest proportion of their population using medical cannabis.<span id="more-6077"></span></p>
<table style="width: 100%;" border="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#cccccc">
<td><strong>Medical Marijuana State</strong></td>
<td>Age 12-17 Monthly Use When Passed</td>
<td>Age 12-17 <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k8State/AppB.htm">Monthly Use in 2008</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/States/StatesCrashesAndAllVictims.aspx">Highway Fatalities When Passed</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/States/StatesCrashesAndAllVictims.aspx">Highway Fatalities in 2009</a></td>
<td>Workplace Injuries / Illness When Passed</td>
<td>Workplace Injuries / Illness in 2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>California</strong> (1996)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">7.70%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>6.86%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3,989</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>3,081</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr966ca.pdf">7.1%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096ca.pdf"> 4.2%</a></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Washington</strong> (1996)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">9.90%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.17%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">662</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>492</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986wa.pdf">9.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096wa.pdf"> </a><strong><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096wa.pdf">5.3%</a></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Oregon</strong> (1998)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">9.60%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.22%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">538</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>377</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986or.pdf"> 6.8%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096or.pdf"><strong> 4.5%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Alaska</strong> (1998)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">10.40%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.03%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">70</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>64</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986ak.pdf"> 7.4%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096ak.pdf"> <strong>4.6%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Maine </strong>(1999)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">7.20%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">9.06%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">181</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>159</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr996me.pdf"> 8.8%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096me.pdf"> <strong>5.6%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Nevada</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">9.54%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.52%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">323</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>243</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr006nv.pdf"> 7.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096nv.pdf"><strong> 4.4%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Hawaii</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">8.72%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.07%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">132</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>109</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr006hi.pdf"> 6.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096hi.pdf"> <strong>4.2%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colorado</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">10.80%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>9.10%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">681</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>465</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Vermont</strong> (2004)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k4State/appB.htm#TabB.3">11.11%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>10.86%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">98</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>74</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr046vt.pdf"> 5.6%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096vt.pdf"> <strong>5.1%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Montana</strong> (2004)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k4State/appB.htm#TabB.3">10.00%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.60%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">229</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>221</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr046mt.pdf"> 7.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096mt.pdf"> <strong>5.3%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Rhode Island</strong> (2006)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k6state/AppB.htm">9.74%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>9.46%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">81</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">83</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr066ri.pdf"> 5.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>New Mexico</strong> (2007)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k7State/AppB.htm">8.73%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.19%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">413</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>361</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr076nm.pdf"> 5.0%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096nm.pdf"> <strong>4.8%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Michigan</strong> (2008)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">7.36%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">980</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>871</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr086mi.pdf"> 4.5%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096mi.pdf"> <strong>4.2%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img title="More..." src="http://blog.norml.org/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" />Fourteen of the seventeen medical marijuana jurisdictions have mandatory registries while two (California and Colorado) offer optional registries and one (Washington) has no registry system.  Estimating California&#8217;s patient numbers is hampered by its registry system being on a county-by-county basis.  California NORML&#8217;s Dale Gieringer estimates between 2% &#8211; 3% of the state&#8217;s population are holding medical marijuana recommendations &#8211; meaning possibly <strong>over one million medical marijuana patients in California alone.</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>California&#8217;s patient population can be estimated from data from other medical marijuana states where patients are required to register, shown in the table below. The top two of these are Colorado and Montana, which, like California, have a well developed network of cannabis clinics and dispensaries, and which report usage rates of 2.5% and 3.0%, respectively. Other states, where medical marijuana is less developed, report lower rates of 1% and less. However, <strong>California is likely to be on the high side because it has the oldest and most liberal law in the nation.</strong> Significantly, California is the only state that permits marijuana to be used for any condition for which it provides relief &#8211; in particular, psychiatric disorders, such as PTSD, bipolar disorder, ADD, anxiety and depression, which account for some 20%-25% of the total patient population. Adjusting for this, usage in California could be as much as 25% to 33% higher than in Colorado and Montana, which would put it well over 3% of the population (1,125,000).</p>
<p>A 2%+ patient population estimate is supported by data from the <a href="http://www.patientidcenter.org/" target="_blank">Oakland Patient ID Center</a>, which has been issuing patient identification cards to its members since 1996. The OPIDC serves patients from all over the state, but especially the greater Oakland-East Bay area of Northern California, where its cards are honored by law enforcement. As of 2010, the OPIDC had issued ID&#8217;s to 19,805 members from five East Bay cities <strong>(Oakland, Berkeley, Alameda, Hayward and Richmond), amounting to 2.4% of the local population.</strong>Because the cards were issued over a period of 14 years, they include numerous patients who have lapsed, moved, or deceased. On the other hand, they do not include many other local patients who have current recommendations but never registered with the OPIDC.</p></blockquote>
<p>We have made a similar estimate for Washington State&#8217;s patients, who are the only ones in the nation with no registry system in place (Gov. Gregoire recently signed a bill that initiates a voluntary registry).  With a law very similar to Oregon&#8217;s concerning qualifying conditions, <strong>applying Oregon&#8217;s 1.04% patient population figure gives us about 69,000 patients in Washington.</strong> However, Washington State&#8217;s larger urban centers (Seattle and Spokane), combined with a more liberal law than Oregon&#8217;s regarding who can sign recommendations (osteopaths, naturopaths, and nurse practitioners can recommend in Washington) and the lack of a state registry&#8217;s burden to patient compliance with the program suggests a higher estimate of 1.5% &#8211; 2% may be appropriate.  Numbers like Colorado&#8217;s 2.5% and Montana&#8217;s 3% are improbable as Washington lacks the greater patient access to dispensaries seen in those states.</p>
<p>Delaware, New Jersey, and D.C.&#8217;s programs are not operational yet, so they are not shown in our data table.  Most of the other state&#8217;s programs produce reports of patient registry numbers.  With Arizona signing up over 3,600 patients since mid-April, when it&#8217;s online-only registration went into effect, <strong>Arizona is on track to register over 30,000 patients this year.</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Quick Facts about Medical Marijuana States:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The 1.1 &#8211; 1.5 million estimated and registered medical marijuana patients in America are legally entitled to cultivate 17 &#8211; 24 million cannabis plants and possess 283 &#8211;  402 tons of harvested buds.</li>
<li>The seventeen jurisdictions with medical marijuana encompass over 90 million Americans and 162 votes in the <a href="http://www.270towin.com/">2012 Electoral College</a>.</li>
<li>Patients make up over 3% of the population of Montana, almost 2.5% of Colorado, over 2% of California. and over 1% of Oregon, and Washington.</li>
<li>After Michigan at 0.76% of population, every other medical marijuana state has less than 3 in 1,000 (0.3%) patients in its population.</li>
<li>California, Colorado, Washington, Michigan, Oregon, and Montana comprise over 98% of the legal medical marijuana patients in America.</li>
<li>More than 3 out of four (77% &#8211; 83%) of all medical marijuana patients live on the West Coast.</li>
<li>Rhode Island and Vermont, two states where over 10% of the adult population uses marijuana monthly, have patient populations of 0.29% and 0.05%, respectively.</li>
<li>Monthly teen use of marijuana is down in every medical marijuana state except Maine.</li>
<li>Annual highway fatalities are down in every medical marijuana state except Rhode Island.</li>
<li>Incidents of workplace injuries and illnesses are down in every medical marijuana state.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Your Own Piece of NORML History!</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/13/get-your-own-piece-of-norml-history/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/13/get-your-own-piece-of-norml-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 18:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina Fendrick, NORML Women's Alliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collectible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorabilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shirts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=5948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NORML memberships are the lifeblood of the organization.  If you enjoy reading NORML’s articles or listening to the podcast, if have received free legal or drug testing advice, then we urge you to become a contributing member of the organization.  This will allow us to continue to bring you the most comprehensive, up-to-date information on all things related to marijuana law reform across the country.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 style="text-align: left;">Spring Membership Drive</h1>
<h3 style="text-align: left;">Limited Edition NORML Collectibles</h3>
<p>NORML is proud to announce the 2011 <a title="Join NORML" href="https://secure.norml.org/normljoin.plx?item1=mem_weekly"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Spring Membership Drive</span></a>, which means that each week, we will be offering exclusive collectible items available for a limited time only.  Starting today, and for this week only, if you join NORML as a “<a title="Join NORML" href="https://secure.norml.org/normljoin.plx?item1=mem_weekly"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Citizen Advocate</span></a>” you can have your own limited edition t-shirt from the historic 40th Annual National Conference.  <a href="https://secure.norml.org/normljoin.plx?item1=mem_weekly"><img src="http://norml.org/images/blog/conference_shirt.jpg" alt="Conference Shirt" width="200" height="200" vspace="3" border="0" align="left" class="noBorder" title="Conference Shirt"></a></p>
<p>NORML <a href="https://secure.norml.org/normljoin.plx?item1=mem_weekly"><span style="color: #0000ff;">memberships</span></a> are the lifeblood of the organization.  If you enjoy reading NORML’s articles or listening to the podcast, if have received free legal or drug testing advice, then we urge you to become a contributing member of the organization.  This will allow us to continue to bring you the most comprehensive, up-to-date information on all things related to marijuana law reform across the country.</p>
<p>There is a limited supply, and stock is running out fast!  For a special price you can get your t-shirt signed by NORML founder R. Keith Stroup!  <a title="Join NORML" href="https://secure.norml.org/normljoin.plx?item1=mem_weekly"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Join</span></a> NORML today and get your own piece of NORML history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/13/get-your-own-piece-of-norml-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

