<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; Dennis Flaherty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/dennis-flaherty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If Someone Robbed Your House Would You Call Your Doctor? So Why Do Cops Keep Talking About Medical Cannabis?</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/05/04/if-someone-robbed-your-house-would-you-call-your-doctor-so-why-do-cops-keep-talking-about-medical-cannabis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/05/04/if-someone-robbed-your-house-would-you-call-your-doctor-so-why-do-cops-keep-talking-about-medical-cannabis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Ingebrigtsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 292]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Stanek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF 97]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard to imagine that anyone in Minnesota still believes that the cops are a credible source of information regarding SF 97 and HF 292 &#8212; the state&#8217;s pending medical marijuana measures. After all, it was only a few weeks ago when state lawmakers and the local media &#8216;outed&#8217; law enforcement for continually lying about the bills during their public testimony. Nevertheless, in the interest of &#8216;balance&#8217; (and I use that term euphemistically here), state newspapers apparently feel the need to give these tainted folks a platform to spew their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" />It&#8217;s hard to imagine that anyone in Minnesota still believes that the cops are a credible source of information regarding <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12483221">SF 97 and HF 292</a> &#8212; the state&#8217;s <a href="http://www.minnesotacares.org/">pending medical marijuana measures</a>.</p>
<p>After all, it was only a few weeks ago when state lawmakers and the local media <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/29950/medical-marijuana-law-enforcement-caught-in-a-lie"><strong>&#8216;outed&#8217; law enforcement</strong> for continually lying</a> about the bills during their public testimony.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, in the interest of &#8216;balance&#8217; (and I use that term euphemistically here), state newspapers apparently feel the need to give these tainted folks a platform to spew their lies and propaganda &#8212; even though it appears that no one aside from <a href="http://www.startribune.com/yourvoices/44228402.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUdcOy9cP3DieyckcUsI">Gov. Tim Pawlenty</a> is listening.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s arguable that by giving law enforcement a forum, editors <strong>are actually, if inadvertently, <em>promoting</em> marijuana law reform</strong>. After all, the prejudice, fabrications, and misplaced logic exhibited by those who favor prohibition clearly does more to undermine the policy than NORML could ever hope to.</p>
<p>A case in point. <a href="http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentary/43647107.html?elr=KArksc8P:Pc:U0ckkD:aEyKUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU">Writing</a> in the <em>Minneapolis Star-Tribune,</em> local sheriff Richard Stanek goes off on a tirade about marijuana. But if one reads between the lines, it becomes readily obvious (to anyone but the sheriff), that <strong>his gripe is really with cannabis <em>prohibition</em></strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentary/43647107.html?elr=KArksc8P:Pc:U0ckkD:aEyKUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU">Lighten up on marijuana?</a></strong><br />
By RICHARD W. STANEK</p>
<p>&#8230; The connection between marijuana and violent crime should not be underestimated. <strong>The violence related to marijuana isn&#8217;t a result of the effects on the user but rather stems from the money people can make selling and growing the drug.</strong> Violence is part of the trade. By legalizing marijuana-growing operations and drug traffic, we would invite violence into our communities.</p>
<p>&#8230; <strong>We should never lose focus on the immediate connection between guns, gangs, kids and drugs &#8212; and marijuana is frequently the connection.</strong> I have been in law enforcement for 25 years and have seen this firsthand. When I was captain of the Criminal Investigations Division with the Minneapolis Police Department, we investigated a case involving a man from out-of-state who tried to buy marijuana for personal use. He unwittingly approached a gang-connected dealer. The man was shot and killed so gang members could keep his money and the marijuana.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read about any gang-related violence surrounding the sale of alcohol lately? How about vicodin or paxil? Didn&#8217;t think so. The irony, of course, is that <strong>the very ramifications that Sheriff Stanek claims to lament are, in fact, direct consequences of the public policy he reflexively endorses</strong>.</p>
<p>Of course, Sheriff Stanek isn&#8217;t alone is his twisted thinking (another euphemism). In a pro/con piece <a href="http://www.postbulletin.com/newsmanager/templates/localnews_story.asp?z=12&amp;a=397769">published today</a> in the <em>Rochester Post-Bulletin</em>, Dennis J. Flaherty, executive director and chief lobbyist of the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association, also predictably plays the &#8216;violence&#8217; card (among others).</p>
<blockquote><p>The facts are that marijuana is a drug that is associated with violent crimes such as robberies and assaults. <strong>Many have and will resort to almost anything to get their hands on it.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>And here I thought cops believed that pot smoking made people unmotivated.</p>
<p>The cop lobbyist goes on to make a number of other false accusations as well. You are free to read them <a href="http://www.postbulletin.com/newsmanager/templates/localnews_story.asp?z=12&amp;a=397769">here</a>. (Have a strong anti-emetic handy.)</p>
<p>Fortunately, despite this deluge of deliberately false information, most Minnesota politicians &#8212; <a href="http://www.echopress.com/articles/index.cfm?id=64915&amp;section=News">former sheriff and current Senator Bill Ingebrigtsen notwithstanding</a> &#8212; are <a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/news_cut/archive/2009/05/medical_marijuana_bill_passes.shtml">voting</a> on the side of truth. Will Gov. Pawlenty do likewise? <strong>If you live in Minnesota, now might be a good time <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12483221">to ask him</a>.</strong></p>
<p>PS: Think that Minnesota is the only state whose cops blatently lie about medical marijuana? <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/political-fix/political-fix/2009/04/ill-medical-marijuana-debate-still-smoking/">Think again</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/05/04/if-someone-robbed-your-house-would-you-call-your-doctor-so-why-do-cops-keep-talking-about-medical-cannabis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

