<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; Department of Health and Human Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/department-of-health-and-human-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Use By The Numbers</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/09/10/marijuana-use-by-the-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/09/10/marijuana-use-by-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adolescents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Survey on Drug Use and Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=1597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI: Feel free to also comment on this commentary (and digg it) at the Huffington Post here and at Alternet.org here. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has once again released their annual survey on &#8220;drug use and health&#8221; &#8212; you know, the one where representatives of the federal government go door-to-door and ask Americans if they are presently breaking state and federal law by using illicit drugs. The same survey where respondents have historically under reported their usage of alcohol and tobacco &#8212; these two legal substances [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" /><strong>FYI: Feel free to also comment on this commentary (and digg it) at the Huffington Post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-armentano/marijuana-use-by-the-numb_b_282396.html">here</a> and at Alternet.org <a href="http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/142556/the_numbers_are_in%3A_despite_70%2B_years_of_criminal_prohibition%2C_marijuana_is_hugely_popular/">here</a></strong>.</p>
<p>The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has once again released their <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2K8NSDUH/tabs/toc.htm">annual survey on &#8220;drug use and health&#8221;</a> &#8212; you know, the one where representatives of the federal government <a href="http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/20071/">go door-to-door</a> and ask Americans if they are presently breaking state and federal law by using illicit drugs. The same survey where respondents <strong>have historically under reported their usage of alcohol and tobacco</strong> &#8212; these two legal substances &#8212; by as much as <a href="http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/20071/">30 to 50 percent</a>, and arguably under report their use of illicit substances by an even greater margin. The same survey that &#8212; despite these inherent limitations &#8212; &#8220;is the <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k8nsduh/2k8Results.cfm#1.1">primary source of statistical information on the use of illegal drugs</a> by the U.S. population.&#8221; Yeah, <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k8nsduh/2k8Results.cfm">that one</a>.</p>
<p>So what does the government&#8217;s latest round of &#8216;statistical (though highly questionable) information&#8217; tell us? Nothing we didn&#8217;t already know.</p>
<p>Despite 70+ years of criminal prohibition, marijuana still remains <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2K8NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.1A">widely popular</a> among Americans, with over <strong>102 million Americans</strong> (41 percent of the U.S. population) having used it during their lifetimes, <strong>26 million</strong> (10 percent) having used it in the past year, and over <strong>15 million</strong> (6 percent) admitting that they use it regularly. (By contrast, <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2K8NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.1B">fewer than 15 percent of adults have ever tried cocaine</a>, the second most &#8216;popular&#8217; illicit drug, and fewer than 2 percent have ever tried heroin &#8212; so much for that supposed &#8216;gateway effect.&#8217;) Predictably, all of the 2008 marijuana use figures are <em>higher</em> than those that were reported for the previous year &#8212; <a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/555/drug_czar_ONDCP_fails_to_reduce_marijuana_use">great work John Walters</a>!</p>
<p>Equally predictably, the government&#8217;s long-standing prohibition and anti-pot &#8216;scare&#8217; campaigns have done little, if anything, to dissuade young people from trying it. According to the survey, <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2K8NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.3B">15 percent</a> of those age 14 to 15 have tried pot (including 12 percent in the past year), as have <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2K8NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.4B">31 percent</a> of those age 16 to 17 (a quarter of which have done so in the past year) &#8212; percentages that make marijuana virtually <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k8nsduh/2k8Results.cfm#3.1">as popular as alcohol</a> among these age groups. By age 20, <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2K8NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.5B">45 percent</a> of adolescents have tried pot, and nearly a third of those age 18 to 20 have done so in the past year. And <strong>by age 25, <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2K8NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.6B">54 percent</a> of the population has admittedly used marijuana</strong>.</p>
<p>Question: Does anyone still believe that marijuana prohibition is <em>working</em> &#8212; or that <em>all</em> of these people deserve to be behind bars?<span id="more-1597"></span></p>
<p>For too long, advocates of prohibition have framed their arguments on the false assumption that the continued enforcement of said laws &#8220;protects our children.&#8221; As the numbers above illustrate, this premise is nonsense. In fact, just the opposite is true.</p>
<p>The government&#8217;s war on cannabis and cannabis consumers <em>endangers</em> the health and safety of our children. It enables young people to have unregulated access to marijuana &#8212; easier access than they presently <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/08/28/study-says-its-easier-for-teens-to-buy-marijuana-than-beer/">have to alcohol</a>. It enables young people to interact and befriend pushers of other illegal, more dangerous drugs. It compels young people to <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/09/09/study-marijuana-imagery-in-anti-pot-ads-encourages-teen-use/">dismiss the educational messages</a> they receive pertaining to the potential health risks posed by the use of &#8220;hard drugs&#8221; and prescription pharmaceuticals, because kids say, &#8220;If they lied to me about pot, why wouldn&#8217;t they be lying to me about everything else, too?&#8221;</p>
<p>Most importantly, the criminal laws are far more likely to result in <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2008/10/20/norml-2008-conference-the-war-on-pot-is-a-war-on-young-people/">having our children arrested</a>, placed behind bars, and stigmatized with a lifelong criminal record than they are likely to in any way discourage them to try pot.</p>
<p>In short, what the results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health is simple and consistent; in fact, we say it all the time:  <strong>Remember prohibition? It still doesn&#8217;t work!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/09/10/marijuana-use-by-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Government Patents Medical Pot</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/07/03/us-government-patents-medical-pot/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2008/07/03/us-government-patents-medical-pot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCIENCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabinoids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroprotectants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Patent 6630507]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/07/03/us-government-patents-medical-pot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The extent of the federal government&#8217;s hypocrisy on the issue of medicinal cannabis truly knows no bounds. Don&#8217;t believe me? Just click here. (Thanks to Huffington Post blogger Brinna for the link.) US Patent 6630507 &#8211; Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants Application: filed on 2/02/2001 US Patent Issued on October 7, 2003 Assignee: The United States of America, as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services   And there you have it. The same federal government that steadfastly denies pot has any medicinal value also holds the medical patents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The extent of the federal government&#8217;s hypocrisy on the issue of medicinal cannabis truly knows no bounds. Don&#8217;t believe me? Just click <a href="http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507/fulltext.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>(Thanks to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com">Huffington Post</a> blogger Brinna for the link.)</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507.html"><strong>US Patent 6630507</strong></a> &#8211; Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants</p>
<p>Application: filed on 2/02/2001</p>
<p>US Patent Issued on October 7, 2003</p>
<p>Assignee: <strong>The United States of America, as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services</strong>  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>And there you have it. The same federal government that steadfastly denies pot has any medicinal value also holds the medical patents on the plant&#8217;s various therapeutic cannabinoids. And they aren&#8217;t the only ones who do.</p>
<p>NORML podcaster Russ Belville and I will be discussing this issue in depth &#8212; as well as the related issue of whether or not Big Pharma is behind the prohibition of pot &#8212; on the <a href="http://stash.norml.org/">Daily Audio Stash</a> next week.</p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2008/07/03/us-government-patents-medical-pot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

