<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; Maine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/maine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New England Remains The Regional Leader In Pot Use &#8212; What The Northeast&#8217;s Affinity With Cannabis Says About The Viability Of Prohibition</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/08/new-england-remains-the-regional-leader-in-pot-use-what-the-northeasts-affinity-with-cannabis-says-about-the-viability-of-prohibition/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/08/new-england-remains-the-regional-leader-in-pot-use-what-the-northeasts-affinity-with-cannabis-says-about-the-viability-of-prohibition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerlikowske]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Engalnd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state by state use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=6620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government has once again released its state-by-state estimate of self-reported licit and illicit substance use. You can download the full report here. Once again, the northeast leads the nation in self-reported marijuana use in practically every measurable category. Among states reporting &#8216;marijuana use in the past year among persons aged 12 and older,&#8217; Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont all rank in the top percentile. (Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, and Oregon round out the list.) Among states reporting &#8216;marijuana use in the past year among youths [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" />The federal government has once again released its state-by-state estimate of self-reported licit and illicit substance use. You can download the full report <a href="http://store.samhsa.gov/product/State-Estimates-of-Substance-Use-and-Mental-Disorders-from-the-2008-2009-National-Survey-on-Drug-Use-and-Health-NSDUH-/SMA11-4641">here</a>.</p>
<p>Once again, <strong>the northeast leads the nation in self-reported marijuana use in practically every measurable category</strong>.</p>
<p>Among states reporting &#8216;<strong>marijuana use in the past year among persons aged 12 and older</strong>,&#8217; Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont all rank in the top percentile. (Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, and Oregon round out the list.) Among states reporting &#8216;<strong>marijuana use in the past year among youths age 12 to 17</strong>,&#8217; Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont top the list (along with Alaska, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, and Oregon).</p>
<p>The totals in the category &#8216;<strong>marijuana use in the past year among persons age 18 to 25</strong>&#8216; is even more New England-centric, with every northeast state (Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont) all included in the top percentile (along with Alaska, Colorado, New York, and Oregon).  In the category, &#8216;<strong>marijuana use in the past month among persons age 26 or older</strong>&#8216; Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont top the list (along with Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, and Oregon).</p>
<p>The findings are notable because they are consistent from previous years and provide plenty of fodder for combating numerous drug warrior myths and stereotypes (such as the notion that high rates of illicit drug use &#8212; yes, the New England states lead in this broader category too &#8212; are typically relegated to poorer, urban, more racially diverse areas).</p>
<p><strong>They also call into question the notion that marijuana use among the general population is in any way influenced by the legal status of marijuana.</strong> State criminal penalties for cannabis vary widely across the New England states. For instance, Maine&#8217;s decriminalization <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&amp;Group_ID=4541">law</a> (possession of up to 2.5 ounces is a civil violation punishable by a $100 fine) is among the most liberal in the country. Conversely, New Hampshire (up to one year in jail) and Rhode Island (up to one year in jail and a six month driver&#8217;s license suspension) maintain relatively strict penalties. Yet regardless of state law, marijuana use remains similar throughout the region.</p>
<p>Likewise, nationally, Mississippi and Nebraska &#8212; which enjoy some of the most liberal marijuana laws (simple possession is a summons and a civil violation, respectively) &#8212; also rank among the lowest rates of self-reported cannabis use.</p>
<p>You can review the state-by-state maps for yourself <a href="http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SMA11-4641/SMA11-4641.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>One final note, it should be noted that despite the prevalence of medical marijuana <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391">states</a> in these rankings, the authors of the report acknowledge that there is no evidence that the implementation of medi-pot laws is increasing the use of cannabis or other illicit drugs. As noted in the study&#8217;s <a href="http://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/advisories/1107200356.aspx">press release</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;Current illicit drug use dropped among adolescents aged 12 to 17 in 17 states between 2002-2003 and 2008-2009 &#8212; <strong>no increases in current illicit drug use occurred in any state in this age group over this time period</strong>.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a point that NORML has made repeatedly, most recently <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/134069-drug-czar-blames-rising-teen-pot-use-on-medical-cannabis-laws-rather-than-on-the-administrations-own-failed-policies-">in response to Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske&#8217;s false claims</a>. The Marijuana Policy Project also has a newly updated report thoroughly rebuking this claim <a href="http://blog.mpp.org/medical-marijuana/medical-marijuana-laws-do-not-affect-teen-use/06302011/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/08/new-england-remains-the-regional-leader-in-pot-use-what-the-northeasts-affinity-with-cannabis-says-about-the-viability-of-prohibition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maine: Governor Signs Law Expanding Privacy, Other Legal Protections For Medical Cannabis Patients</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/06/27/maine-governor-signs-law-expanding-privacy-other-legal-protections-for-medical-cannabis-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/06/27/maine-governor-signs-law-expanding-privacy-other-legal-protections-for-medical-cannabis-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frenchville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LD 1296]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LePage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=6323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a time when lawmakers in several states are seeking to limit or suspend their medical marijuana programs, Maine lawmakers are expanding patients&#8217; protections and access under the law. On Friday, Republican Gov. Paul LePage signed legislation, LD 1296, into law on that enhances privacy protections for qualified medical cannabis patients. The measure eliminates a 2010 legislative mandate requiring medical marijuana patients to be registered with the state in order to receive legal protection under state law. It also eliminates language requiring physician’s to disclose a patient&#8217;s specific medical condition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/mmj_stethiscope.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="149" />At a time when lawmakers in several states are seeking to <a href="http://www.freedomisgreen.com/nj-ri-hold-back-on-multi-million-dollar-marijuana-centers/">limit</a> or <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/christie_to_delay_implementing.html">suspend</a> their medical marijuana programs, <strong>Maine lawmakers are expanding patients&#8217; protections and access under the law</strong>.</p>
<p>On Friday, Republican Gov. Paul LePage <a href="http://bangordailynews.com/2011/06/24/health/new-medical-marijuana-law-would-eliminate-mandatory-registration/?ref=latest">signed</a> legislation, <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills_125th/billtexts/HP095102.asp">LD 1296</a>, into law on that enhances privacy protections for qualified medical cannabis patients.</p>
<p>The measure eliminates a 2010 <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Maine">legislative mandate</a> requiring medical marijuana patients to be registered with the state in order to receive legal protection under state law. It also eliminates language requiring physician’s to disclose a patient&#8217;s specific medical condition with the Maine Department of Health and Human Services.</p>
<p>In addition, LD 1296 limits the ability of law enforcement to seize cannabis from lawful patients, and mandates for the return of any seized property within seven days.</p>
<p>Only two additional states – California and Washington – <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391">do not require</a> patients to be registered with the state to receive limited legal protections.</p>
<p><strong>The new law takes effect in approximately 90 days.</strong></p>
<p>In March, Safe Alternatives, <a href="http://www.wlbz2.com/news/article/153933/315/Marijuana-dispensary-opens-in-Frenchville">the first state-regulated medical marijuana dispensary on the East Coast</a>, opened in Frenchville, Maine. Since then, <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/20/maine-takes-pride-in-medical-pot/">two additional dispensaries</a> have opened their doors. The state expects to have eight licensed dispensaries up and running imminently.</p>
<p><em>Additional information on this study will appear in this week’s <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3442">NORML news update</a>. To receive these e-mail updates free, please sign up <a href="http://mail.norml.org/s/news.420">here</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/06/27/maine-governor-signs-law-expanding-privacy-other-legal-protections-for-medical-cannabis-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s One Million Legalized Marijuana Users</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Belville, NORML Outreach Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAMILIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dale Gieringer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Lichty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Coast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=6077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Least 1 &#8211; 1.5 Million Americans are Legal Medical Marijuana Patients Market for these patients in sixteen states and D.C. estimated at between $2 &#8211; $6 billion annually MAY 31, 2011 - We don&#8217;t know his or her name, but somewhere in one of sixteen states and the District of Columbia is America&#8217;s 1,000,000th legal medical marijuana patient. We estimate the United States reached the million-patients mark sometime between the beginning of the year to when Arizona began issuing patient registry identification cards online in April 2011. Between one to one-and-a-half million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>At Least 1 &#8211; 1.5 Million Americans are Legal Medical Marijuana Patients</strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Market for these patients in sixteen states and D.C. estimated at between $2 &#8211; $6 billion annually</em></strong></p>
<p>MAY 31, 2011 - We don&#8217;t know his or her name, but somewhere in one of sixteen states and the District of Columbia is <strong>America&#8217;s 1,000,000th legal medical marijuana patient.</strong> We estimate the United States reached the million-patients mark sometime between the beginning of the year to when <a href="http://stash.norml.org/arizona-medical-marijuana-program-opens-first-online-only-registration">Arizona began issuing patient registry identification cards online in April 2011</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_23836" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Marijuana-States-of-America-2011-05-Full.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-23836" title="Marijuana States of America - 2011-05 Full" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Marijuana-States-of-America-2011-05-Full-150x93.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="93" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">16 states, the Capitol, and ONE MILLION legal marijuana users.</p></div>
<p>Between one to one-and-a-half million people are legally authorized by their state to use marijuana in the United States, according to data compiled by NORML from state medical marijuana registries and patient estimates.  Assuming usage of one-half to one gram of cannabis medicine per day per patient and an <a href="http://www.priceofweed.com/">average retail price of $320 per ounce</a>, <strong>these legal consumers represent a $2.3 to $6.2 billion dollar market annually.</strong></p>
<p>Based on state medical marijuana laws, the amounts of cannabis these legal marijuana users are entitled to possess means there is between 566 &#8211; 803 thousand pounds of legal usable cannabis <em>allowed under state law</em> in America.  These patients are allowed to cultivate between 17 &#8211; 24 million legal cannabis plants.  There may possibly be more, as California and New Mexico &#8220;limits&#8221; may be exceeded with doctor&#8217;s permission and some California counties explicitly allow greater amounts, so <strong>there may be as much as 1 million pounds of state-legal cannabis <em>allowed under state law</em> in America.</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#cccccc">
<td><strong><a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391">Active Medical Marijuana State</a> </strong>(Total population of sixteen medical marijuana states + D.C. = over 90 million.  D.C., Delaware, and New Jersey programs are not yet active.)</td>
<td># Legal Medical Marijuana Patients (% of state population)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>California </strong>(1996) - No central state registry, 2% &#8211; 3% of overall population estimate by Dale Gieringer at California NORML by comparing rates in Colorado &amp; Montana.</td>
<td>~<strong>750,000 </strong>(2.00%)</p>
<p><em>~1,125,000 (3.00%)</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Washington </strong>(1998) - No registry, 1% &#8211; 1.5% of overall population estimate by Russ Belville at NORML by comparing rates in Oregon &amp; Colorado.</td>
<td>~<strong>67,000</strong> (1.00%)</p>
<p><em>~100,000 (1.50%)</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Oregon </strong>(1998) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://public.health.oregon.gov/DISEASESCONDITIONS/CHRONICDISEASE/MEDICALMARIJUANAPROGRAM/Pages/data.aspx">39,774</a> </strong>(1.04%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Alaska </strong>(1998) - No data online, verified by author&#8217;s call to Alaska Bureau of Vital Statistics.</td>
<td><strong>380 </strong>(0.05%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Maine </strong>(1999) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/dlrs/reports/mmm-program-report-3-2011.pdf">796</a> </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Nevada </strong>(2000) - 2008 figures from ProCon.org, awaiting return call from state for official number.</td>
<td><strong>860 </strong>(0.03%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Hawaii </strong>(2000) - Estimate from Pam Lichty of Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii; program is run by law enforcement who are reluctant to release data.</td>
<td>~<strong>8,000 </strong>(0.59%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colorado </strong>(2000) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/hs/medicalmarijuana/statistics.html">123,890</a> </strong>(2.46%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Vermont </strong>(2004) - No data online, verified by author&#8217;s call to Vermont Criminal Information Center.</td>
<td><strong>349 </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Montana </strong>(2004) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/medicalmarijuana/MMPRegistryInformation.pdf">30,609</a> </strong>(3.09%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Rhode Island </strong>(2006) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.health.ri.gov/publications/programreports/MedicalMarijuana2011.pdf">3,069</a> </strong>(0.29%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>New Mexico </strong>(2007) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.health.state.nm.us/IDB/medicalcannabis/Medical%20Cannabis%20Numbers%20as%20of%205-5-11.pdf">3,615</a> </strong>(0.18%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Michigan</strong> (2008) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.michigan.gov/lara/0,1607,7-154-27417_51869---,00.html">75,521</a> </strong>(0.76%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Arizona </strong>(2010) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.azdhs.gov/medicalmarijuana/documents/reports/110524_Patient-Application-Report.pdf">3,696</a> </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>TOTAL US LEGAL MARIJUANA USERS</strong></td>
<td>~<strong>1,100,000 </strong>(1.22%)</p>
<p><em>~1,500,000 (1.67%)</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Yet after fifteen years, one million patients, and a million pounds of legal marijuana, few if any of the dire predictions by opponents of medical marijuana have come to fruition.  Medical marijuana states like Oregon are experiencing their <a href="http://stash.norml.org/oregon-reports-lowest-rates-of-workplace-illness-and-injury-ever-recorded">lowest-ever rates of workplace fatalities, injuries, and accidents</a>.  States like Colorado are experiencing their <a href="http://stash.norml.org/denver-posts-editorial-board-raises-reefer-madness-fears-of-stoned-drivers">lowest rates in three decades of fatal crashes per million miles driven</a>.  In <a href="http://www.ukcia.org/research/ImpactOfStateMMJLaws.pdf">medical marijuana states for which we have data</a> (through Michigan in 2008), use by minor teenagers is down in all but Maine and down by at least 10% in states with the greatest proportion of their population using medical cannabis.<span id="more-6077"></span></p>
<table style="width: 100%;" border="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#cccccc">
<td><strong>Medical Marijuana State</strong></td>
<td>Age 12-17 Monthly Use When Passed</td>
<td>Age 12-17 <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k8State/AppB.htm">Monthly Use in 2008</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/States/StatesCrashesAndAllVictims.aspx">Highway Fatalities When Passed</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/States/StatesCrashesAndAllVictims.aspx">Highway Fatalities in 2009</a></td>
<td>Workplace Injuries / Illness When Passed</td>
<td>Workplace Injuries / Illness in 2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>California</strong> (1996)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">7.70%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>6.86%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3,989</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>3,081</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr966ca.pdf">7.1%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096ca.pdf"> 4.2%</a></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Washington</strong> (1996)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">9.90%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.17%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">662</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>492</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986wa.pdf">9.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096wa.pdf"> </a><strong><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096wa.pdf">5.3%</a></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Oregon</strong> (1998)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">9.60%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.22%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">538</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>377</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986or.pdf"> 6.8%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096or.pdf"><strong> 4.5%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Alaska</strong> (1998)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">10.40%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.03%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">70</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>64</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986ak.pdf"> 7.4%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096ak.pdf"> <strong>4.6%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Maine </strong>(1999)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">7.20%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">9.06%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">181</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>159</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr996me.pdf"> 8.8%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096me.pdf"> <strong>5.6%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Nevada</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">9.54%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.52%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">323</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>243</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr006nv.pdf"> 7.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096nv.pdf"><strong> 4.4%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Hawaii</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">8.72%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.07%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">132</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>109</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr006hi.pdf"> 6.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096hi.pdf"> <strong>4.2%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colorado</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">10.80%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>9.10%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">681</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>465</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Vermont</strong> (2004)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k4State/appB.htm#TabB.3">11.11%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>10.86%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">98</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>74</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr046vt.pdf"> 5.6%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096vt.pdf"> <strong>5.1%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Montana</strong> (2004)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k4State/appB.htm#TabB.3">10.00%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.60%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">229</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>221</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr046mt.pdf"> 7.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096mt.pdf"> <strong>5.3%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Rhode Island</strong> (2006)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k6state/AppB.htm">9.74%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>9.46%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">81</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">83</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr066ri.pdf"> 5.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>New Mexico</strong> (2007)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k7State/AppB.htm">8.73%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.19%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">413</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>361</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr076nm.pdf"> 5.0%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096nm.pdf"> <strong>4.8%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Michigan</strong> (2008)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">7.36%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">980</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>871</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr086mi.pdf"> 4.5%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096mi.pdf"> <strong>4.2%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img title="More..." src="http://blog.norml.org/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" />Fourteen of the seventeen medical marijuana jurisdictions have mandatory registries while two (California and Colorado) offer optional registries and one (Washington) has no registry system.  Estimating California&#8217;s patient numbers is hampered by its registry system being on a county-by-county basis.  California NORML&#8217;s Dale Gieringer estimates between 2% &#8211; 3% of the state&#8217;s population are holding medical marijuana recommendations &#8211; meaning possibly <strong>over one million medical marijuana patients in California alone.</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>California&#8217;s patient population can be estimated from data from other medical marijuana states where patients are required to register, shown in the table below. The top two of these are Colorado and Montana, which, like California, have a well developed network of cannabis clinics and dispensaries, and which report usage rates of 2.5% and 3.0%, respectively. Other states, where medical marijuana is less developed, report lower rates of 1% and less. However, <strong>California is likely to be on the high side because it has the oldest and most liberal law in the nation.</strong> Significantly, California is the only state that permits marijuana to be used for any condition for which it provides relief &#8211; in particular, psychiatric disorders, such as PTSD, bipolar disorder, ADD, anxiety and depression, which account for some 20%-25% of the total patient population. Adjusting for this, usage in California could be as much as 25% to 33% higher than in Colorado and Montana, which would put it well over 3% of the population (1,125,000).</p>
<p>A 2%+ patient population estimate is supported by data from the <a href="http://www.patientidcenter.org/" target="_blank">Oakland Patient ID Center</a>, which has been issuing patient identification cards to its members since 1996. The OPIDC serves patients from all over the state, but especially the greater Oakland-East Bay area of Northern California, where its cards are honored by law enforcement. As of 2010, the OPIDC had issued ID&#8217;s to 19,805 members from five East Bay cities <strong>(Oakland, Berkeley, Alameda, Hayward and Richmond), amounting to 2.4% of the local population.</strong>Because the cards were issued over a period of 14 years, they include numerous patients who have lapsed, moved, or deceased. On the other hand, they do not include many other local patients who have current recommendations but never registered with the OPIDC.</p></blockquote>
<p>We have made a similar estimate for Washington State&#8217;s patients, who are the only ones in the nation with no registry system in place (Gov. Gregoire recently signed a bill that initiates a voluntary registry).  With a law very similar to Oregon&#8217;s concerning qualifying conditions, <strong>applying Oregon&#8217;s 1.04% patient population figure gives us about 69,000 patients in Washington.</strong> However, Washington State&#8217;s larger urban centers (Seattle and Spokane), combined with a more liberal law than Oregon&#8217;s regarding who can sign recommendations (osteopaths, naturopaths, and nurse practitioners can recommend in Washington) and the lack of a state registry&#8217;s burden to patient compliance with the program suggests a higher estimate of 1.5% &#8211; 2% may be appropriate.  Numbers like Colorado&#8217;s 2.5% and Montana&#8217;s 3% are improbable as Washington lacks the greater patient access to dispensaries seen in those states.</p>
<p>Delaware, New Jersey, and D.C.&#8217;s programs are not operational yet, so they are not shown in our data table.  Most of the other state&#8217;s programs produce reports of patient registry numbers.  With Arizona signing up over 3,600 patients since mid-April, when it&#8217;s online-only registration went into effect, <strong>Arizona is on track to register over 30,000 patients this year.</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Quick Facts about Medical Marijuana States:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The 1.1 &#8211; 1.5 million estimated and registered medical marijuana patients in America are legally entitled to cultivate 17 &#8211; 24 million cannabis plants and possess 283 &#8211;  402 tons of harvested buds.</li>
<li>The seventeen jurisdictions with medical marijuana encompass over 90 million Americans and 162 votes in the <a href="http://www.270towin.com/">2012 Electoral College</a>.</li>
<li>Patients make up over 3% of the population of Montana, almost 2.5% of Colorado, over 2% of California. and over 1% of Oregon, and Washington.</li>
<li>After Michigan at 0.76% of population, every other medical marijuana state has less than 3 in 1,000 (0.3%) patients in its population.</li>
<li>California, Colorado, Washington, Michigan, Oregon, and Montana comprise over 98% of the legal medical marijuana patients in America.</li>
<li>More than 3 out of four (77% &#8211; 83%) of all medical marijuana patients live on the West Coast.</li>
<li>Rhode Island and Vermont, two states where over 10% of the adult population uses marijuana monthly, have patient populations of 0.29% and 0.05%, respectively.</li>
<li>Monthly teen use of marijuana is down in every medical marijuana state except Maine.</li>
<li>Annual highway fatalities are down in every medical marijuana state except Rhode Island.</li>
<li>Incidents of workplace injuries and illnesses are down in every medical marijuana state.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORML’s Weekly Legislative Round Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/02/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-17/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/02/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 22:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPFHI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregoire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patients & Families United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schweitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=5827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a listing of all of the pending marijuana law reform proposals that NORML is tracking, please visit NORML’s ‘Take Action Center’ here. (For a map of pending legislation, please visit here.) Hawaii: House and Senate lawmakers could not come to agreement on Senate Bill 1458 before Friday’s legislative deadline, killing the measure for this year. As amended, the measure sought to restrict patients&#8217; access to medical marijuana and would have imposed an exorbitant tax on the sale of medical cannabis via a single, state-licensed dispensary. As a result, NORML [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/state_capitol.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="213" />For a listing of all of the pending marijuana law reform proposals that NORML is tracking, please visit NORML’s ‘Take Action Center’ <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/?style=D">here</a>. (For a map of pending legislation, please visit <a href="http://stash.norml.org/data-stash/marijuana-activism-alerts">here</a>.)</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Hawaii: </strong>House and Senate lawmakers <strong>could not come to agreement on Senate Bill 1458</strong> before Friday’s legislative deadline, <a href="http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Hawaii-marijuana-dispensary-idea-dies-1360008.php">killing</a> the measure for this year. As amended, the measure sought to <a href="http://www.kitv.com/r/27682393/detail.html">restrict patients&#8217; access</a> to medical marijuana and would have imposed an exorbitant tax on the sale of medical cannabis via a single, state-licensed dispensary. As a result, NORML and our local allies <a href="http://www.dpfhi.org/">The Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii</a> <http://www.dpfhi.org/> had withdrawn its support for the measure. NORML and DPFHI will continue to partner in our efforts to work with legislators to enact sensible marijuana law reform in 2012.</p>
<p><strong>Maine: </strong>Members of the<a href="http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/jt_com/crj.htm"> Joint Standing Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety</a> <strong>will hear public testimony on Tuesday, May 10</strong>, in support of  <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/display_ps.asp?ld=1453&#038;PID=1456&#038;snum=125">LD 1453</a>, which seeks to regulate the commercial production and distribution of marijuana for adults over 21 years of age. You can support this effort via NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=40822516">here</a>, and you can watch a recent press conference in support of the measure <a href="http://www.freedomisgreen.com/video-maine-legalization-bill-press-conference/">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Montana:</strong> On Friday, April 29, Gov. Brian Schwietzer <a href="http://topnews.us/content/239444-montana-governor-passively-brings-new-marijuana-bill-law">announced</a> <strong>that he intends to allow SB 423 to become law absent his signature</strong>. Senate Bill 423 repeals the state’s six-year-old medical marijuana <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Montana">law</a> on July 1, 2011 and <a href="http://stash.norml.org/changes-to-montanas-medical-marijuana-law">replaces</a> it with entirely new provisions created by the legislature. The stated <a href="http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_9177bc02-6483-11e0-a377-001cc4c03286.html">intent</a> of this measure is to reduce the number of state-licensed medical cannabis patients from an estimated 28,000 today to less than 2,000. </p>
<p>Among the most serious changes in law: </p>
<p>* Chronic pain patients will face more stringent requirements to qualify under the law, and in some cases may require a recommendation from two separate physicians; </p>
<p>* Patients found guilty of marijuana DUI will have their medical marijuana privileges revoked; Advising physicians will be reported to the Board of Medical Examiners if they recommend for more than 25 patients per year. </p>
<p>* Physician will be responsible for the costs of this investigation; </p>
<p>*Caregivers may accept no monetary compensation for providing cannabis to qualified patients.</p>
<p>A full summary of SB 423’s provisions is available <a href="http://blog.montananorml.org/2011/04/30/highlights-of-montanas-new-medical-marijuana-law/">here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.montananorml.org">Montana NORML</a> is still encouraging advocates to pressure the Governor to change his mind and veto SB 423. You can contact the Governor’s office and leave a message at: 406-444-3111. Montana NORML is also <a href="http://blog.montananorml.org/2011/05/02/newsletter-our-new-medical-marijuana-law-strategies-and-next-steps/">contemplating</a> the possibility of taking legal action and/or initiating a citizens’ referendum to delay or block the implementation of this law. For more information on these efforts, please contact Montana NORML <a href="http://www.montananorml.org/">here</a> (or on Facebook <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mtnorml?sk=wall">here</a> or contact Patients and Families United <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Patients-Families-United/182521988424944">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Washington: </strong>Democrat Gov. Chris Gregoire on Friday <a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2011/apr/29/washington_governor_vetoes_medic"><strong>vetoed</a> sections of <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2011-12/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Passed%20Legislature/5073-S2.PL.pdf">Senate Bill 5073</strong></a>, which sought to license and regulate the dispensing of medical cannabis to qualified persons, and would have enacted additional legal protections for patients who voluntarily participated in a statewide registry. In her <a href="http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/PDF.pdf">veto statement</a>, Gov. Gregoire alleged that the licensing and registry provisions “would open public employees to federal prosecution.”</p>
<p>Governor Gregoire did sign into law provisions in the measure reaffirming that qualified patients and their caregivers possess an ‘affirmative defense’ against state prosecution (Section 402 and 406). She also codified provisions of the measure that extend legal protections to patients or caregivers who participate in a ‘collective garden.’ A summary of the sections of SB 5073 that were approved, as well as a summary of sections that were vetoed, is available <a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2011/apr/29/washington_governor_vetoes_medic">here</a> and <a href="http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/PDF.pdf">here</a>. Additional information is available from the Washington state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) <a href="http://www.aclu-wa.org/">here</a> or via Washington NORML <a href="http://www.facebook.com/wanorml">here</a>.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/02/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is New England The New Hotbed For Marijuana Law Reform?</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/03/04/is-new-england-the-new-hotbed-for-marijuana-law-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/03/04/is-new-england-the-new-hotbed-for-marijuana-law-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=5472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The northeast has historically been a hotbed for marijuana use &#8212; with five of the six New England states self-reporting some of the highest percentages of marijuana consumption in the nation. But recently New England has also become a regional leader in marijuana law reform. Lawmakers in every New England state are now debating marijuana law reform legislation. Here&#8217;s a closer look at what&#8217;s happening. Connecticut: The nutmeg state is the only northeast state besides New Hampshire that has yet to enact some form of marijuana decriminalization or medicalization. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/cannabis_flower.jpg" class="alignright" width="198" height="260" />The northeast has historically been a hotbed for marijuana use &#8212; with <a href="http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k7State/Ch2.htm#Fig2-5">five of the six</a> New England states self-reporting some of the highest percentages of marijuana consumption in the nation. But recently New England has also become a regional leader in marijuana law reform.</p>
<p>Lawmakers in every New England state are now debating marijuana law reform legislation. Here&#8217;s a closer look at what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p><strong>Connecticut:</strong> The nutmeg state is the only northeast state besides New Hampshire that has yet to enact some form of marijuana decriminalization or medicalization. But that drought may end this year. Weeks ago, newly elected Democrat Gov. Dan Malloy <a href="http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Malloy-s-plan-to-decriminalize-pot-draws-few-hits-1016799.php%3E">publicly affirmed</a> his support for legislation that seeks to reduce minor marijuana possession to a noncriminal offense. Malloy endorsed reducing adult marijuana possession penalties from a criminal misdemeanor (punishable by one year in jail and a $1,000 fine) to an infraction, punishable by a nominal fine, no jail time, and no criminal record. Gov. Malloy has also spoken out in favor of legalizing the physician-authorized use of medical marijuana. (Similar legislation was passed by the legislature in 2007, but was <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7285">vetoed</a> by then-Gov. Jodi Rell.) You can contact your state elected officials in favor of both of these proposals <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=22605576">here</a> and <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=22593501">here</a>. You can also get involved with Connecticut NORML <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3433#Connecticut">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Maine: </strong> Maine voters have twice approved ballot initiatives in recent years addressing the medical use and distribution of medical cannabis. And in 2009, Maine lawmakers <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7870">increased</a> the amount of marijuana that may be classified as a civil offense from 1.25 ounces to 2.5 ounces (the second highest threshold in the nation). This year state lawmakers have introduced a pair of bills, LD 754 and LD 750, to expand the state’s existing marijuana decriminalization law. <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/summary.asp?ID=280040055">LD 754</a> would amend existing law so that the adult possession of over 2.5 ounces but less than 5 ounces is classified as a civil violation. <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/summary.asp?ID=280040056">LD 750</a> would amend existing law so that the cultivation of up to six marijuana plants by an adult is also classified as a civil violation. Both measures have been referred to the <a href="http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/jt_com/crj.htm">Joint Committee Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee</a>. You can contact your lawmakers in support of these measures <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=32843501">here</a>. NORML is also working with state lawmakers regarding the introduction of separate legislation to legalize adult marijuana possession, production, and distribution. You can learn more about this pending legislation <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVP6XuLwcoM">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Massachusetts:</strong> In 2008, a whopping <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2008/11/05/truth-prevails/">65 percent</a> of voters in endorsed Question 2 decriminalizing the adult possession of an ounce or less of cannabis to a fine-only civil offense. Now a coalition of state lawmakers are backing <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=28792501">House Bill 1371</a> to legalize and regulate adult marijuana production and sales in Massachusetts. You can watch a 60-minute discussion with the bill&#8217;s lead sponsor and supporter <a href="http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/local/infocus/22news-infocus-the-marijuana-bill">here</a>. You can contact your state elected officials in support of HB 1371 <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=28792501">here</a>, or by visiting the Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition/NORML <a href="http://www.masscann.org/">here</a>. You can learn about a separate state legislative effort to regulate the use of medical marijuana <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=32321516">here</a>. </p>
<p><strong>New Hampshire:</strong> Lawmakers this week <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2011/03/01/nh_bill_would_legalize_medical_use_of_marijuana/">heard testimony</a> in favor of <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=26741501">House Bill 442</a>, which legalizes the physician-supervised use of medical marijuana. (Similar legislation passed both the House and the Senate in 2009, but was <a href="http://stash.norml.org/new-hampshire-gov-lynch-vetoes-medical-marijuana-bill">vetoed</a> by Governor John Lynch.) You can write your lawmakers in favor of HB 442 via NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=26741501">here</a>, or by contacting <a href="http://nhcompassion.org/">NHCompassion.org</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Rhode Island:</strong> In coming days, Rhode Island state regulators will become only the third in the nation to begin <a href="http://www.projo.com/news/content/MARIJUANA_HEARING_02-06-11_QRM6HGH_v48.16ac3d0.html">licensing</a> medical marijuana dispensaries. A coalition of lawmakers is also debating the amending the state&#8217;s penalties for non-patients. <a href="http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText11/HouseText11/H5031.pdf">House Bill 5031</a> amends state law so that the adult possession of up to one ounce of marijuana is reduced from a criminal <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&#038;Group_ID=4562">misdemeanor</a> (punishable by one year in jail and a $500 maximum fine) to a civil offense, punishable by a $150 fine, no jail time, and no criminal record. You can voice your support for HB 5031 by clicking <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=22909501">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Vermont:</strong> Two separate marijuana law reform measures are pending before Vermont lawmakers. Senate Bill 17 proposes expanding the state&#8217;s medical marijuana law to permit the establishment of two nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries in the state. You can learn more about this measure <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=22312516">here</a>. <a href="http://www.leg.state.vt.us/database/status/summary.cfm?Bill=H.0427&#038;Session=2012">House Bill 427</a> amends state law so that the adult possession of up to one ounce of marijuana is reduced from a criminal <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&#038;Group_ID=4568">misdemeanor</a> (punishable by six months in jail and a $500 maximum fine) to a civil offense, punishable by a $150 fine, no jail time, and no criminal record. Passage of the measure, which has been <a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2010/sep/29/two_democratic_governor_candidat">endorsed</a> by Democrat Governor Peter Shumlin, will allow state law enforcement to reallocate an estimated $700,000 annually in criminal justice resources. You can contact your House member in support of HB 427 <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=32825501">here</a>.</p>
<p>For up-to-date information on marijuana law reform measures pending in other states, please visit NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/?style=D">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/03/04/is-new-england-the-new-hotbed-for-marijuana-law-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s DEA Nominee Pledges To Ignore Administration&#8217;s Medical Marijuana Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/18/obamas-dea-nominee-pledges-to-ignore-administrations-medical-marijuana-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/18/obamas-dea-nominee-pledges-to-ignore-administrations-medical-marijuana-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal raids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=4719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a little over a year ago when the United States Department of Justice announced that it would back away from pursuing cases against medical marijuana patients and providers who are acting in accordance with state and local laws. &#8220;As a general matter, pursuit of [federal law enforcement] priorities should not focus federal resources &#8230; on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana,&#8221; The DOJ announced on October 19, 2009. &#8220;For example, prosecution of individuals with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/DEAlogo.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="217" />It was a little over a year ago when the United States Department of Justice announced that it would <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/19/AR2009101903638.html">back away</a> from pursuing cases against medical marijuana patients and providers who are acting in accordance with state and local laws.</p>
<p>&#8220;As a general matter, pursuit of [federal law enforcement] priorities should not focus federal resources &#8230; on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana,&#8221; The DOJ <a href="http://blogs.usdoj.gov/blog/archives/192">announced</a> on October 19, 2009. &#8220;For example, prosecution of individuals with cancer or other serious illnesses who use marijuana as part of a recommended treatment regimen consistent with applicable state law, or those caregivers in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state law who provide such individuals with marijuana, is unlikely to be an efficient use of limited federal resources.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apparently <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=15006066">Michelle Leonhart</a>, President Obama&#8217;s nominee to direct the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, didn&#8217;t get the memo.</p>
<p>Speaking yesterday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, on day one of her Senate confirmation process, <strong>Leonhart pledged to ignore the administration&#8217;s formal medical marijuana guidelines</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/11/18/michele-leonhart-one-step-closer-to-officially-heading-up-the-dea/print/">Michele Leonhart one step closer to officially heading up the DEA</a></strong><br />
<em>via The Daily Caller</em></p>
<p>[excerpt] Acting director Michele Leonhart is that much closer to officially heading up the Drug Enforcement Agency after successfully navigating a hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.</p>
<p>If confirmed to the position she’s already held for three years, Leonhart said she would expand the DEA’s anti-cartel operations in Mexico <strong>and continue to enforce federal drug laws in states where medical marijuana is legal</strong>.</p>
<p>&#8230; Perhaps due to the failure of Prop 19 in California (and despite the passage of medical marijuana in Arizona), Kohl, along with Democratic Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Al Franken of Minnesota, <strong>made no mention of medical marijuana</strong>. Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, however, made it his prime focus.</p>
<p>“I’m a big fan of the DEA,” said Sessions, before asking Leonhart point blank if she would fight medical marijuana legalization.</p>
<p>“I have seen what marijuana use has done to young people, I have seen the abuse, I have seen what it’s done to families. It’s bad,” Leonhart said. <strong>“If confirmed as administrator, we would continue to enforce the federal drug laws.”</strong></p>
<p>“These legalization efforts sound good to people,” Sessions quipped. “They say, ‘We could just end the problem of drugs if we could just make it legal.’ But any country that’s tried that, Alaska and other places have tried it, have failed. It does not work,” Sessions said.</p>
<p>“We need people who are willing to say that. Are you willing to say that?” Sessions asked Leonhart.</p>
<p>“Yes, I’ve said that, senator. You’re absolutely correct [about] the social costs from drug abuse, especially from marijuana,” Leonhart said. “Legalizers say it will help the Mexican cartel situation; it won’t. It will allow states to balance budgets; it won’t. No one is looking [at] the social costs of legalizing drugs.”</p></blockquote>
<p>It is shocking to learn that not a single Senator who attended the hearing, in particular Democrat Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse from Rhode Island, had the courage to demand that Ms. Leonhart respect the laws of the <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391">15 states</a> that have legalized the use of marijuana as a medicine. In the case of Sen. Whitehouse, his own state is now in the process of licensing state-certified marijuana providers and distributors; <strong>yet he appears to have no problem with the idea of appointing a federal official who declares her intention to put his own constituents in federal prison.</strong></p>
<p>It gets even more disturbing. In the days leading up to Wednesday&#8217;s initial confirmation hearing, a <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/promarijuana-groups-urge-senate-question-dea-head/">coalition</a> of advocacy groups &#8212; including <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/129219-obamas-pick-to-head-dea-needs-to-answer-some-tough-questions">NORML</a>, <a href="http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=6192">Americans for Safe Access</a>, and <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2010/11/16/3189560/medical-marijuana-coalition-presses.html">others</a> called on members of the Senate Judiciary to ask Ms. Leonhart tough questions regarding her <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/12/senate-scheduled-to-vote-next-week-obamas-drug-warrior-nominee-michele-leonhart/">public record</a>, one that is incompatible with state laws, public opinion, and with the policies of this administration. Yet not a single Senator did so.</p>
<p>There is a growing divide between state and federal law concerning the use of marijuana for medical purposes, and it would only take members of the Senate &#8212; or Ms. Leonhart for that matter &#8212; a cursory scan of today&#8217;s google headlines to see it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20022928-10391704.html">Prop 203 Passes: Medical Marijuana to Be Legal in Arizona</a><br />
via CBS News</p>
<p><a href="http://newmexicoindependent.com/66851/nm-approves-six-new-medical-marijuana-producers">New Mexico approves six new medical marijuana producers</a><br />
via The New Mexico Independent</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/maine/articles/2010/11/13/maine_couple_cleared_to_open_marijuana_clinic/">Maine couple cleared to open marijuana clinic</a><br />
via The Associated Press</p>
<p><a href="http://www.necn.com/11/15/10/DC-revises-medical-marijuana-regulations/landing_politics.html?&amp;blockID=3&amp;apID=2661d567eda24542a62193216353b1c5">DC revises medical marijuana regulations</a><br />
via Comcast</p>
<p>As we&#8217;ve written before, as Interim DEA director, Ms. Leonhart has overseen dozens of federal raids on medical marijuana providers, producers, and laboratory facilities that engage in the testing of cannabis potency and quality. Yesterday Ms. Leonhart pledged to continue these actions &#8212; actions that violate this administration&#8217;s own written policies, and more importantly, actions that target the civilians of fifteen states and the <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#District%20of%20Columbia">District of Columbia</a>. <strong>These people are the constituents of 30 percent of the U.S. Senate; yet not even one of these elected officials appears willing to speak up for them. </strong>That is disgraceful<strong>.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Want to write or call your Senator about Ms. Leonhart&#8217;s nomination process? You can still do so <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=15006066">here</a> and <a href="http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/18/obamas-dea-nominee-pledges-to-ignore-administrations-medical-marijuana-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>156</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Times&#8217; Medical Marijuana Grow Clinic in Rhode Island, October 30th</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/10/24/high-times-medical-marijuana-grow-clinic-in-rhode-island-october-30th/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/10/24/high-times-medical-marijuana-grow-clinic-in-rhode-island-october-30th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LITIGATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCIENCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growing marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Times Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warwick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=4383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first ever medical marijuana cultivation clinic in New England will be held by High Times Magazine next Saturday, October 30th in Rhode Island. There are three New England states that allow medical patients with a physician&#8217;s recommendation to cultivate and use cannabis, Vermont, Maine and Rhode Island (of note, Maine and Rhode Island have recently passed laws that allow for the retail sale and government regulation of medical cannabis products). No other publication in the world has taught more people about high quality cannabis and how to cultivate it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first ever medical marijuana cultivation <a href="http://hightimes.com/growclinic" target="_blank">clinic</a> in New England will be held by <em>High Times Magazine</em> next Saturday, October 30th in Rhode Island.</p>
<p>There are three New England <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391" target="_blank">states that allow medical patients with a physician&#8217;s recommendation to cultivate and use cannabis</a>, Vermont, Maine and Rhode Island (of note, Maine and Rhode Island have recently passed laws that allow for the retail sale and government regulation of medical cannabis products).<a href="http://hightimes.com/growclinic" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-4384 alignright" title="HT_MMJclinic" src="http://blog.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/HT_MMJclinic.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="136" /></a></p>
<p>No other publication in the world has taught more people about high quality cannabis and how to cultivate it than <a href="http://hightimes.com" target="_blank"><em>High Times Magazine</em></a>. For the low price of $200 and a seven hour investment, medical cannabis patients and cultivators can get the best and most up-to-date information and technology recommendations from the leader in cannabis cultivation information for over 35 years.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;">For  over 35 years, HIGH TIMES has taught the world how to grow &#8211; and now  this is your chance to learn in person from HIGH TIMES cultivation  experts Danny Danko and Nico Escondido!  Topics will include:</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;">Beginner indoor and hydro growing</span></strong></li>
<li><strong><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;">Getting the most out of your plants</span></strong></li>
<li><strong><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;">Choosing medicinal strains</span></strong></li>
<li><strong><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;">Cultivating and medicating legally</span></strong></li>
<li><strong><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;">Special presentation by Allen St. Pierre, Executive Director of NORML<br />
</span></strong></li>
<li><strong><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;">And more!</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;">***Seating for this event is extremely limited and tickets may only be purchased online in advance***</span></strong></p>
<p>With cannabis retailing for $300-$600 an ounce these days, home cultivation is consistent with New Englander&#8217;s love of thrift and self-reliance! I should know as I was born in down east Maine, grew up on Cape Cod and schooled in Amherst&#8230;</p>
<p>Please join me and a number of expert cannabis cultivators and <em>High Times</em> editors in Rhode Island next Saturday afternoon as the investment in time and money to travel in from all points of New England (and up from soon-to-be medical cannabis state New Jersey and the District of Columbia; as well as New York and Pennsylvania) will be well worth-the-while for the education, networking opportunities and comradery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/10/24/high-times-medical-marijuana-grow-clinic-in-rhode-island-october-30th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Dispensaries Are Coming To New England</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/07/09/medical-marijuana-dispensaries-are-coming-to-new-england/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/07/09/medical-marijuana-dispensaries-are-coming-to-new-england/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=3677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While New Jersey lawmakers continue to stall statewide efforts to provide legal patient access to medical marijuana, a pair of New England states &#8212; Maine and Rhode Island &#8212; have quietly and expeditiously embraced the process. In Rhode Island, Health officials are deciding who among 15 applicants will receive state authorization to produce and dispense marijuana to the state&#8217;s 1,800 registered patients. And in Maine health officials gave public approval today to three separate nonprofit corporations to supply and provide patients with medical marijuana via six statewide facilities. While it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/medical_cannabis.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="172" />While New Jersey lawmakers <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2010/06/29/new-jersey-patients-will-have-to-wait-lawmakers-delay-implementation-of-medical-marijuana-law/">continue to stall</a> statewide efforts to provide legal patient access to medical marijuana, a pair of New England states &#8212; Maine and Rhode Island &#8212; have quietly and expeditiously embraced the process.</p>
<p>In Rhode Island, Health officials are <a href="http://www2.turnto10.com/news/2010/jun/29/applicants-patients-discuss-medical-marijuana-cent-ar-126446/">deciding</a> who among <a href="http://www.projo.com/news/content/MARIJUANA_HEARING_06-30-10_I4J1QJJ_v20.183ddd0.html">15 applicants</a> will receive state authorization to produce and dispense marijuana to the state&#8217;s 1,800 registered patients. And in Maine health officials gave public <a href="http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/148337.html">approval today</a> to three separate nonprofit corporations to supply and provide patients with medical marijuana via six statewide facilities.</p>
<p>While it is understandable for activists and advocates alike to look forward to the day when the criminalization of marijuana has been lifted for <em>all</em> adults, we must also not overlook the significant process that we are making, and have made, in recent years. Even just three or four years ago it would have unthinkable to believe that state governments would be licensing private citizens to grow and dispense marijuana. But today we are seeing this progress happening right before our eyes. And even more encouraging, there seems to be very few people left who oppose it.</p>
<p>If you have not done so already, now is definitely the time to <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3421">get active</a> &#8212; and to <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7191">get NORML</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/07/09/medical-marijuana-dispensaries-are-coming-to-new-england/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORML’s Weekly Legislative Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/04/09/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/04/09/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baldacci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LD 1811]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 5798]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=3181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawmakers around the country are debating a record number of marijuana law reform bills in 2010. NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up is your one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country, along with tips for influencing the policies of your state. ** Remember: NORML can not introduce legislation in your state. Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation &#8216;by request&#8217;) can do so. NORML can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" />Lawmakers around the country are debating a record number of marijuana law reform bills in 2010. NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up is your one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country, along with tips for influencing the policies of your state.</p>
<p>** Remember: <strong>NORML can not introduce legislation in your state.</strong> Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation &#8216;by request&#8217;) can do so.  NORML can &#8212; and does &#8212; work closely with like-minded politicians and citizens to reform marijuana laws, and lobbies on behalf of these efforts. <strong>But ultimately the most effective way &#8212; and the only way &#8212; to successfully achieve statewide marijuana law reform is for local stakeholders and citizens to become involved in the political process and make the changes they want to see. </strong>We can&#8217;t do it without you.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Washington:</strong> Democrat Gov. Christine Gregoire <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011503825_apwaxgrmedicalmarijuana.html">signed legislation into law</a> last week that expands the state’s nearly twelve-year-old <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Washington">medical marijuana law</a>. <strong>Senate Bill <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5798&amp;year=2009">5798</a> allows additional health care professionals including naturopaths, physician’s assistants, osteopathic physicians, osteopathic physicians assistants, and advanced registered nurse practitioners to legally recommend marijuana therapy to their patients.</strong> Presently, only licensed physicians may legally recommend medicinal cannabis.</p>
<p>Washington is the first state to codify these recommendation rights into law. Senate Bill 5798 takes effect on June 10, 2010.</p>
<p><strong>Maine:</strong> State lawmakers <a href="http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/140714.html">approved legislation</a> this week establishing guidelines for the establishment of state-authorized medical marijuana distribution facilities. As approved by the legislature,<strong> <a href="http://www.legislature.maine.gov/legis/bills/bills_124th/billtexts/SP071901.asp">LD 1811</a> authorizes the creation of up to eight nonprofit medical cannabis dispensaries – one for each of the state’s public health districts</strong>.  Under the measure, dispensaries may legally “acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture, deliver, transfer, transport, sell, supply or dispenses marijuana or related supplies and educational materials” to state-authorized medical marijuana patients.</p>
<p><strong>Patients and/or their caregivers will still be allowed to cultivate their own medical cannabis under state law.</strong> However, patients will now be required to join a confidential state registry in order to be able to legally possess and grow marijuana for medicinal purposes. The Maine Department of Health and Human Services will oversee the new medical marijuana programs.</p>
<p>Last November, voters <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8011">approved Question 5</a>, the Maine Marijuana Medical Act, which amends existing state law by: establishing a confidential patient registry; expanding the list of qualifying conditions for which a physician may recommend medicinal cannabis; and by allowing for the creation of state-licensed nonprofit dispensaries. In 1999, 61 percent of state voters <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Maine">approved</a> the physician-supervised use of medical marijuana. However, the law did not establish a state identification registry for qualified patients, nor did it address regulating the distribution of medical marijuana.</p>
<p>Democrat Gov. John Baldacci is anticipated to sign the dispensary measure into law imminently.</p>
<p><strong>Ohio:</strong> House lawmakers this week introduced <a href="http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=128_HB_478">House Bill 478</a>, the Ohio Medical Compassion Act. The act would allow state-authorized patients to possess and cultivate cannabis for therapeutic purposes. The bill allows for authorized patients or their designated caregivers to cultivate medical marijuana, but only at designated registered sites. <strong>Patients are allowed to possess up to 200 grams of usable cannabis (about six ounces) or 12 mature plants under this proposal.</strong> To support this measure, visit the <a href="http://ohiopatientsnetwork.org">Ohio Patient&#8217;s Network</a> or NORML’s ‘Take Action’ Center <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14914766">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Pennsylvania:</strong> Minor marijuana possession offenses in the city of Philadelphia will be no longer be prosecuted as criminal misdemeanors, according to a <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-29881-Philadelphia-NORML-Examiner~y2010m4d6-PhillyNORML-City-is-not-decriminalizing-pot">policy change</a> announced this week by new District Attorney Seth Williams. <a href="http://www.phillynorml.org/">Philadelphia NORML</a> had been lobbying for the policy change after publishing a <a href="http://www.phillynorml.org/pages/news/20100323_Philly:_White_women_rarely_arrested_for_pot">report</a> which found that African American males comprised an estimated 83 percent of all persons in Philadelphia arrested for minor marijuana possession offenses.</p>
<p>Under the new policy, which is anticipated to take effect later this month, <strong>prosecutors will charge minor marijuana possession (defined as 30 grams or less) as &#8216;summary offenses&#8217; rather than criminal misdemeanors</strong>. Defendants will be required to pay a fine, but will not face incarceration or receive a criminal record. Under the previous District Attorney, the city criminally prosecuted some 3,000 minor marijuana possession cases per year.</p>
<p>You can read further details regarding this policy change <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-29881-Philadelphia-NORML-Examiner~y2010m4d6-PhillyNORML-City-is-not-decriminalizing-pot">here</a>, <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/89894257.html">here</a>, and <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/columnists/20100407_Monica_Yant_Kinney__Phila__pot_plan_saves_money__court_time.html">here</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>To learn about pending legislation in additional states &#8212; and how you can get involved, please visit NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action&#8217; Center <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/">here</a>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/04/09/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009: The Year In Review – NORML&#8217;s Top 10 Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Field poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head and neck cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measure F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ogden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OR NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schedule I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zogby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#1 Obama Administration: Don&#8217;t Focus On Medical Marijuana Prosecutions United States Deputy Attorney General David Ogden issued a memorandum to federal prosecutors in October directing them to not &#8220;focus federal resources &#8230; on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.&#8221; The directive upheld a campaign promise by President Barack Obama, who had previously pledged that he was &#8220;not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue.&#8221; Read the full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_freetheprisoners.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="287" /><strong>#1 Obama Administration: Don&#8217;t Focus On Medical Marijuana Prosecutions</strong><br />
United States Deputy Attorney General David Ogden issued a <a href="http://blogs.usdoj.gov/blog/archives/192">memorandum</a> to federal prosecutors in October directing them to not &#8220;focus federal resources &#8230; on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.&#8221; The directive upheld a campaign promise by President Barack Obama, who had previously <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvUziSfMwAw">pledged</a> that he was &#8220;not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7998">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#2 Public Support For Legalizing Pot Hits All-Time High</strong><br />
A majority of U.S. voters now support legalizing marijuana, according to a <a href="http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/34651/most_americans_support_legalizing_marijuana">national poll</a> of 1,004 likely voters published in December by Angus Reid. The Angus Reid Public Opinion poll results echo those of separate national polls conducted this year by <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7996">Gallup</a>, <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7806">Zogby</a>, <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/04/30/abc-news-publics-support-for-pot-legalization-has-never-been-higher/">ABC News</a>, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/02/americans-growing-kinder-to-bud.html">CBS News</a>, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/02/americans-growing-kinder-to-bud.html">Rasmussen Reports</a>, and the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/30/BA1417BHMA.DTL&amp;hw=marijuana&amp;sn=005&amp;sc=443">California Field Poll</a>, each of which reported greater public support for marijuana legalization than ever before. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8054">here</a>.<br />
<strong><br />
#3 Lifetime Marijuana Use Associated With <em>Reduced</em> Cancer Risk</strong><br />
The moderate long-term use of cannabis is associated with a reduced risk of head and neck cancer, according to the results of a population-based control study published in August by the journal <em>Cancer Prevention Research</em>. Authors <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19638490">reported</a>, &#8220;After adjusting for potential confounders (including smoking and alcohol drinking), 10 to 20 years of marijuana use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7944">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#4 AMA Calls For Review Of Marijuana&#8217;s Prohibitive Status</strong><br />
In November, the American Medical Association resolved that marijuana should longer be classified as a Schedule I prohibited substance. Drugs classified in Schedule I are <a href="http://www.justice.gov/dea/pubs/abuse/1-csa.htm#Schedule%20I">defined</a> as possessing &#8220;no currently accepted use in treatment in the United States.&#8221; In a separate action, the AMA also <a href="http://americansforsafeaccess.org/downloads/AMA_Report.pdf">determined</a>, &#8220;Results of short term controlled trials indicate that smoked cannabis reduces neuropathic pain, improves appetite and caloric intake especially in patients with reduced muscle mass, and may relieve spasticity and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8020">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#5 California: Lawmakers Hold Historic Hearing On Marijuana Legalization</strong><br />
State lawmakers heard <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7999">testimony</a> in October in support of taxing and regulating the commercial production and distribution of cannabis for adults age 21 and older. Additional hearings, <strong>as well as a vote</strong> on <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896#at">Assembly Bill 390: the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act</a>, <strong>are scheduled for January 12, 2010</strong>. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8002">here</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-2504"></span></p>
<p><strong>#6 Maine Voters Approve Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Measure; Dispensaries Coming To Rhode Island, Washington, DC In 2010</strong><br />
Voters in November decided in favor of a statewide <a href="http://www.mainepatientsrights.org/Petition%20MEDICAL%20MARIJUANA.pdf">measure</a> that allows for the state to license non-profit facilities to distribute medical cannabis to qualified patients. The vote marked the first time that citizens ever approved a statewide ballot proposal authorizing the creation of dispensaries. In June, Rhode Island lawmakers <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7901">enacted</a> a similar measure. In December, Congress <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7901">lifted</a> federal restrictions to allow for the DC City Council to implement provisions of a ten-year-old medical marijuana law that would allow for the use and distribution of medicinal cannabis in the District of Columbia. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8011">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#7 Oakland: Voters Approve First-In-The-Nation Medical Marijuana Business Tax</strong><br />
In July 80 percent of municipal voters approved <a href="http://www.smartvoter.org/2009/07/21/ca/alm/meas/F/">Ballot Measure F</a>, the nation&#8217;s first ever business tax on the retail sales of cannabis. The tax, which takes effect on January 1, imposes an exclusive tax for &#8220;cannabis businesses&#8221; of $18 for every $1,000 of gross receipts. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7937">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#8 Rasmussen Poll: Majority Of Americans Say Marijuana Is Safer Than Alcohol</strong><br />
More than half of American adults believe that alcohol is &#8220;more dangerous&#8221; than marijuana, according to the results of a national telephone <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/august_2009/51_rate_alcohol_more_dangerous_than_marijuana">poll</a> of 1,000 likely voters published in September by Rasmussen Reports. Fifty-one percent of respondents, including a majority of women, rated the use of marijuana to be less dangerous than alcohol. Only 19 percent of those polled said that cannabis is the more dangerous of the two substances. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7965">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#9 Many Teens See Medical Cannabis As Alternative Treatment Option</strong><br />
Some one-third of adolescents view their use of marijuana as therapeutic rather than recreational, according to survey data <a href="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/7">published</a> in May by the journal <em>Substance Abuse, Treatment, Prevention and Policy</em>. Teens most commonly reported using cannabis therapeutically to counter symptoms of depression, stress and anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), physical pain, and sleeplessness. In November several mainstream media <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/23/parents-treating-children-with-medical-marijuana-cited-in-mainstream-media/">outlets</a>, including <em>The New York Times</em> and Good Morning America, featured stories on adolescents using marijuana as a medicine. Read the full story <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/23/parents-treating-children-with-medical-marijuana-cited-in-mainstream-media/">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#10 Oregon NORML Opens &#8216;Cannabis Café,&#8217; Media Frenzy Follows</strong><br />
In November <a href="http://www.ornorml.org/">Oregon NORM</a>L <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8024">opened</a> the state&#8217;s first café catering to state-authorized medical marijuana patients. Unlike conventional marijuana dispensaries that operate in states like California and Colorado, medical cannabis is not sold on the premises, nor is the primary function of the café to dispense marijuana. &#8220;This is not a medical marijuana dispensary with a café; this is a café for medical marijuana patients,&#8221; said <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7522">Madeline Martinez</a>, Oregon NORML Executive Director. <em>The Associated Press</em>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5AD06O20091114"><em>Reuters</em></a>, <em><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-11-23-cannibis-oregon_N.htm">USA Today</a></em>, <em><a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/americas-first-cannabis-cafe-open/">The New York Times</a></em>, and <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/portlands_cannabis_cafe_is_the_first">Democracy Now</a> were among the hundreds of media outlets that covered the story. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8024">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

