<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; Massachusetts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/massachusetts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Law Reform Marching On: Legalization Highly Favored In New Massachusetts Poll</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/10/marijuana-law-refom-marching-on-legalization-highly-favored-in-new-massachusetts-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/10/marijuana-law-refom-marching-on-legalization-highly-favored-in-new-massachusetts-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCIENCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MassCann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=7600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[58% support in Massachusetts for legalizing marijuana and regulating it as other agricultural commodities Georgetown, MA – This evening, attendees at the Second Annual Massachusetts Cannabis Convention hosted by the Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition/NORML (MassCann/NORML) at the Crowne Plaza in Natick heard the major results of a live telephone poll conducted in November by DAPA Research Inc. of 600 Massachusetts voters with a margin of error of +/-4%. The most significant findings: *Fifty-eight percent (58%) support legalizing marijuana and regulating it in the same manner as other agricultural commodities with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>58% support in Massachusetts for legalizing marijuana and regulating it as other agricultural commodities</strong></p>
<p><strong>Georgetown, MA</strong> – This evening, attendees at the Second Annual Massachusetts Cannabis Convention hosted by the Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition/NORML (<a href="http://norml.org/chapters/item/masscannnorml?category_id=865">MassCann/NORML</a>) at the Crowne Plaza in Natick heard the major results of a live telephone poll conducted in November by DAPA Research Inc. of 600 Massachusetts voters with a margin of error of +/-4%.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.masscann.org/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8e/MASS_CANN.jpg" alt="" width="245" height="234" /></a></p>
<p>The most significant findings:</p>
<p>*<em>Fifty-eight percent <strong>(58%)</strong> support legalizing marijuana and regulating it in the same manner as other agricultural commodities with sales prohibited to underage persons (69% Democrats, 44% Republicans, 54% Other).</em></p>
<p>*<em>Sixty-two percent <strong>(62%)</strong> are more likely to support legalization if the proposed law would regulate the cultivation and sale of marijuana to adults and tax it in the same manner as the state currently regulates alcohol (70% Democrats, 56% Republicans, 60% Other).</em></p>
<p>*<em>Fifty-four percent <strong>(54%)</strong> oppose the federal government disregarding state law in states legalizing marijuana, while only 35% support the federal government’s disregarding state law.</em></p>
<p>“The data strongly suggests that Massachusetts voters are more ready than voters in any other state to end prohibition and establish reasonable regulation of cannabis cultivation and commerce for all purposes,” said Steven S. Epstein, a founder and currently an officer of MassCann/NORML.  “The data also establishes that if the legislature does not enact a law allowing medical use of marijuana this session the voters will overwhelmingly, perhaps 80%+, approve the voter initiative for the <em>Humanitarian Medical Use of Marijuana</em> at the ballot box in November.”</p>
<p>“Legalization is essential to ending crime created by the prohibition of cannabis,” said Cara Crabb-Burnham, a member of MassCann/NORML’s Board of Directors.  “It is important to recognize legal vendors will card customers and keep it out of the hands of children.”</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>For more information contact:<br />
Michael Crawford, 978-502-4080<br />
Attorney Steven Epstein, 978-352-3300</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/10/marijuana-law-refom-marching-on-legalization-highly-favored-in-new-massachusetts-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New England Remains The Regional Leader In Pot Use &#8212; What The Northeast&#8217;s Affinity With Cannabis Says About The Viability Of Prohibition</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/08/new-england-remains-the-regional-leader-in-pot-use-what-the-northeasts-affinity-with-cannabis-says-about-the-viability-of-prohibition/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/08/new-england-remains-the-regional-leader-in-pot-use-what-the-northeasts-affinity-with-cannabis-says-about-the-viability-of-prohibition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerlikowske]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Engalnd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state by state use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=6620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government has once again released its state-by-state estimate of self-reported licit and illicit substance use. You can download the full report here. Once again, the northeast leads the nation in self-reported marijuana use in practically every measurable category. Among states reporting &#8216;marijuana use in the past year among persons aged 12 and older,&#8217; Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont all rank in the top percentile. (Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, and Oregon round out the list.) Among states reporting &#8216;marijuana use in the past year among youths [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" />The federal government has once again released its state-by-state estimate of self-reported licit and illicit substance use. You can download the full report <a href="http://store.samhsa.gov/product/State-Estimates-of-Substance-Use-and-Mental-Disorders-from-the-2008-2009-National-Survey-on-Drug-Use-and-Health-NSDUH-/SMA11-4641">here</a>.</p>
<p>Once again, <strong>the northeast leads the nation in self-reported marijuana use in practically every measurable category</strong>.</p>
<p>Among states reporting &#8216;<strong>marijuana use in the past year among persons aged 12 and older</strong>,&#8217; Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont all rank in the top percentile. (Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, and Oregon round out the list.) Among states reporting &#8216;<strong>marijuana use in the past year among youths age 12 to 17</strong>,&#8217; Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont top the list (along with Alaska, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, and Oregon).</p>
<p>The totals in the category &#8216;<strong>marijuana use in the past year among persons age 18 to 25</strong>&#8216; is even more New England-centric, with every northeast state (Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont) all included in the top percentile (along with Alaska, Colorado, New York, and Oregon).  In the category, &#8216;<strong>marijuana use in the past month among persons age 26 or older</strong>&#8216; Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont top the list (along with Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, and Oregon).</p>
<p>The findings are notable because they are consistent from previous years and provide plenty of fodder for combating numerous drug warrior myths and stereotypes (such as the notion that high rates of illicit drug use &#8212; yes, the New England states lead in this broader category too &#8212; are typically relegated to poorer, urban, more racially diverse areas).</p>
<p><strong>They also call into question the notion that marijuana use among the general population is in any way influenced by the legal status of marijuana.</strong> State criminal penalties for cannabis vary widely across the New England states. For instance, Maine&#8217;s decriminalization <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&amp;Group_ID=4541">law</a> (possession of up to 2.5 ounces is a civil violation punishable by a $100 fine) is among the most liberal in the country. Conversely, New Hampshire (up to one year in jail) and Rhode Island (up to one year in jail and a six month driver&#8217;s license suspension) maintain relatively strict penalties. Yet regardless of state law, marijuana use remains similar throughout the region.</p>
<p>Likewise, nationally, Mississippi and Nebraska &#8212; which enjoy some of the most liberal marijuana laws (simple possession is a summons and a civil violation, respectively) &#8212; also rank among the lowest rates of self-reported cannabis use.</p>
<p>You can review the state-by-state maps for yourself <a href="http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SMA11-4641/SMA11-4641.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>One final note, it should be noted that despite the prevalence of medical marijuana <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391">states</a> in these rankings, the authors of the report acknowledge that there is no evidence that the implementation of medi-pot laws is increasing the use of cannabis or other illicit drugs. As noted in the study&#8217;s <a href="http://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/advisories/1107200356.aspx">press release</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;Current illicit drug use dropped among adolescents aged 12 to 17 in 17 states between 2002-2003 and 2008-2009 &#8212; <strong>no increases in current illicit drug use occurred in any state in this age group over this time period</strong>.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a point that NORML has made repeatedly, most recently <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/134069-drug-czar-blames-rising-teen-pot-use-on-medical-cannabis-laws-rather-than-on-the-administrations-own-failed-policies-">in response to Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske&#8217;s false claims</a>. The Marijuana Policy Project also has a newly updated report thoroughly rebuking this claim <a href="http://blog.mpp.org/medical-marijuana/medical-marijuana-laws-do-not-affect-teen-use/06302011/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/08/08/new-england-remains-the-regional-leader-in-pot-use-what-the-northeasts-affinity-with-cannabis-says-about-the-viability-of-prohibition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Centennial Anniversary That&#8217;s Hardly Worth Celebrating</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/04/29/a-centennial-anniversary-thats-hardly-worth-celebrating/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/04/29/a-centennial-anniversary-thats-hardly-worth-celebrating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Regulation and Taxation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centennial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugene Foss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geiringer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marihuana Tax Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=5785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marijuana prohibition &#8216;celebrates&#8217; its centennial anniversary today. That&#8217;s right, the government&#8217;s war on cannabis consumers is now officially 100-years-old. Self-evidently, cannabis has won. Although many credit the passage of the federal Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 with the initiation of pot prohibition, the reality is that one hundred years ago today, Massachusetts Governor Eugene Foss signed the first statewide anti-pot prohibition into law. Following Massachusetts, over 30 states quickly followed suit &#8212; including California, Maine, Indiana and Wyoming in 1913 &#8212; leading the way for federal prohibition some two-and-a-half decades [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/woman_prison_hands.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="150" />Marijuana prohibition &#8216;celebrates&#8217; its centennial anniversary today. <strong>That&#8217;s right, the government&#8217;s war on cannabis consumers <a href="http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/04/marijuana_prohibition_100_years.php">is now officially 100-years-old</a>. </strong></p>
<p>Self-evidently, cannabis has <a href="http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k7State/Ch2.htm#Fig2-5">won</a>.</p>
<p>Although many credit the passage of the federal Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 with the initiation of pot prohibition, the reality is that <strong>one hundred years ago today, Massachusetts Governor Eugene Foss <a href="http://www.milforddailynews.com/opinion/x1336254162/Evans-100-years-of-marijuana-prohibition">signed the first statewide anti-pot prohibition into law</a>. </strong>Following Massachusetts, over 30 states quickly followed suit &#8212; including California, Maine, Indiana and Wyoming in 1913 &#8212; leading the way for federal prohibition some two-and-a-half decades later.</p>
<p>Of course, cannabis use was practically non-existent in Massachusetts (as well as in most of the rest of the country) in 1911. Yet today, 100 years following the plant&#8217;s criminalization, the state boasts one of the <a href="http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k7State/Ch2.htm#Fig2-5">highest</a> rates of pot use in the nation.</p>
<p>Former NORML Board Member Richard Evans, author of Massachusetts <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=28792501">House Bill 1371</a>, the Cannabis Regulation and Taxation Act, <a href="http://www.milforddailynews.com/opinion/x1336254162/Evans-100-years-of-marijuana-prohibition">nails it</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Despite a century of ever-zealous enforcement and thunderous propaganda at taxpayer expense, marijuana inextricably permeates our culture. Its cultivation, commerce and use have proven ineradicable. We have tried mightily and we have failed to extirpate it. <strong>If anyone, anywhere, believes that spending more money on marijuana enforcement will drive out pot, let that person come forward and tell us plainly what it will take to make that happen, how much it will cost, and where the money will come from.</strong></p>
<p>The futility of enforcement, however, is not the urgent reason to legalize it. The reason is that prohibition has become a destructive force in our society.</p>
<p>Most perniciously, marijuana prohibition provides the tools and the excuses for the oppression of minorities. No historian denies that the early drug laws were conceived for that purpose, and today&#8217;s grotesquely disproportionate incarceration rate of African-Americans proves that the drug laws have shamefully accomplished that purpose.</p>
<p>Prohibition divides us. Getting caught with pot, or the fear of getting caught, divides parents and teens, employers and employees, friends, neighbors, colleagues, doctors and patients, and citizens and the police. That divisiveness weakens us as we face colossal challenges like a sick economy, the insolvency of states and municipalities, climate change and our addiction to imported oil. <strong>As long as cannabis remains illegal, it cannot be a part of the solution to those colossal challenges.</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; Our immediate challenge is not to legalize cannabis, but to legalize serious talk about it, without smirks and snickers. How legalization can best protect public health and safety, and discourage abuse, and how to tax the substance, are issues not just for politicians, but for everyone. <strong>Legalization is no longer for stoners; it&#8217;s for taxpayers, entrepreneurs and grandparents, horrified at the likely state of the planet on which their grandchildren will grow up.</strong></p>
<p>Let the debate begin now, lest another hundred years go by.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/04/29/a-centennial-anniversary-thats-hardly-worth-celebrating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is New England The New Hotbed For Marijuana Law Reform?</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/03/04/is-new-england-the-new-hotbed-for-marijuana-law-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/03/04/is-new-england-the-new-hotbed-for-marijuana-law-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=5472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The northeast has historically been a hotbed for marijuana use &#8212; with five of the six New England states self-reporting some of the highest percentages of marijuana consumption in the nation. But recently New England has also become a regional leader in marijuana law reform. Lawmakers in every New England state are now debating marijuana law reform legislation. Here&#8217;s a closer look at what&#8217;s happening. Connecticut: The nutmeg state is the only northeast state besides New Hampshire that has yet to enact some form of marijuana decriminalization or medicalization. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/cannabis_flower.jpg" class="alignright" width="198" height="260" />The northeast has historically been a hotbed for marijuana use &#8212; with <a href="http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k7State/Ch2.htm#Fig2-5">five of the six</a> New England states self-reporting some of the highest percentages of marijuana consumption in the nation. But recently New England has also become a regional leader in marijuana law reform.</p>
<p>Lawmakers in every New England state are now debating marijuana law reform legislation. Here&#8217;s a closer look at what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p><strong>Connecticut:</strong> The nutmeg state is the only northeast state besides New Hampshire that has yet to enact some form of marijuana decriminalization or medicalization. But that drought may end this year. Weeks ago, newly elected Democrat Gov. Dan Malloy <a href="http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Malloy-s-plan-to-decriminalize-pot-draws-few-hits-1016799.php%3E">publicly affirmed</a> his support for legislation that seeks to reduce minor marijuana possession to a noncriminal offense. Malloy endorsed reducing adult marijuana possession penalties from a criminal misdemeanor (punishable by one year in jail and a $1,000 fine) to an infraction, punishable by a nominal fine, no jail time, and no criminal record. Gov. Malloy has also spoken out in favor of legalizing the physician-authorized use of medical marijuana. (Similar legislation was passed by the legislature in 2007, but was <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7285">vetoed</a> by then-Gov. Jodi Rell.) You can contact your state elected officials in favor of both of these proposals <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=22605576">here</a> and <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=22593501">here</a>. You can also get involved with Connecticut NORML <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3433#Connecticut">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Maine: </strong> Maine voters have twice approved ballot initiatives in recent years addressing the medical use and distribution of medical cannabis. And in 2009, Maine lawmakers <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7870">increased</a> the amount of marijuana that may be classified as a civil offense from 1.25 ounces to 2.5 ounces (the second highest threshold in the nation). This year state lawmakers have introduced a pair of bills, LD 754 and LD 750, to expand the state’s existing marijuana decriminalization law. <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/summary.asp?ID=280040055">LD 754</a> would amend existing law so that the adult possession of over 2.5 ounces but less than 5 ounces is classified as a civil violation. <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/summary.asp?ID=280040056">LD 750</a> would amend existing law so that the cultivation of up to six marijuana plants by an adult is also classified as a civil violation. Both measures have been referred to the <a href="http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/jt_com/crj.htm">Joint Committee Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee</a>. You can contact your lawmakers in support of these measures <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=32843501">here</a>. NORML is also working with state lawmakers regarding the introduction of separate legislation to legalize adult marijuana possession, production, and distribution. You can learn more about this pending legislation <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVP6XuLwcoM">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Massachusetts:</strong> In 2008, a whopping <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2008/11/05/truth-prevails/">65 percent</a> of voters in endorsed Question 2 decriminalizing the adult possession of an ounce or less of cannabis to a fine-only civil offense. Now a coalition of state lawmakers are backing <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=28792501">House Bill 1371</a> to legalize and regulate adult marijuana production and sales in Massachusetts. You can watch a 60-minute discussion with the bill&#8217;s lead sponsor and supporter <a href="http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/local/infocus/22news-infocus-the-marijuana-bill">here</a>. You can contact your state elected officials in support of HB 1371 <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=28792501">here</a>, or by visiting the Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition/NORML <a href="http://www.masscann.org/">here</a>. You can learn about a separate state legislative effort to regulate the use of medical marijuana <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=32321516">here</a>. </p>
<p><strong>New Hampshire:</strong> Lawmakers this week <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2011/03/01/nh_bill_would_legalize_medical_use_of_marijuana/">heard testimony</a> in favor of <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=26741501">House Bill 442</a>, which legalizes the physician-supervised use of medical marijuana. (Similar legislation passed both the House and the Senate in 2009, but was <a href="http://stash.norml.org/new-hampshire-gov-lynch-vetoes-medical-marijuana-bill">vetoed</a> by Governor John Lynch.) You can write your lawmakers in favor of HB 442 via NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=26741501">here</a>, or by contacting <a href="http://nhcompassion.org/">NHCompassion.org</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Rhode Island:</strong> In coming days, Rhode Island state regulators will become only the third in the nation to begin <a href="http://www.projo.com/news/content/MARIJUANA_HEARING_02-06-11_QRM6HGH_v48.16ac3d0.html">licensing</a> medical marijuana dispensaries. A coalition of lawmakers is also debating the amending the state&#8217;s penalties for non-patients. <a href="http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText11/HouseText11/H5031.pdf">House Bill 5031</a> amends state law so that the adult possession of up to one ounce of marijuana is reduced from a criminal <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&#038;Group_ID=4562">misdemeanor</a> (punishable by one year in jail and a $500 maximum fine) to a civil offense, punishable by a $150 fine, no jail time, and no criminal record. You can voice your support for HB 5031 by clicking <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=22909501">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Vermont:</strong> Two separate marijuana law reform measures are pending before Vermont lawmakers. Senate Bill 17 proposes expanding the state&#8217;s medical marijuana law to permit the establishment of two nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries in the state. You can learn more about this measure <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=22312516">here</a>. <a href="http://www.leg.state.vt.us/database/status/summary.cfm?Bill=H.0427&#038;Session=2012">House Bill 427</a> amends state law so that the adult possession of up to one ounce of marijuana is reduced from a criminal <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&#038;Group_ID=4568">misdemeanor</a> (punishable by six months in jail and a $500 maximum fine) to a civil offense, punishable by a $150 fine, no jail time, and no criminal record. Passage of the measure, which has been <a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2010/sep/29/two_democratic_governor_candidat">endorsed</a> by Democrat Governor Peter Shumlin, will allow state law enforcement to reallocate an estimated $700,000 annually in criminal justice resources. You can contact your House member in support of HB 427 <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=32825501">here</a>.</p>
<p>For up-to-date information on marijuana law reform measures pending in other states, please visit NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/?style=D">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/03/04/is-new-england-the-new-hotbed-for-marijuana-law-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORML’s Weekly Legislative Round Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/02/16/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-14/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/02/16/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decriminalize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MassCann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=5365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marijuana law reform legislation is pending in over twenty states, and progressive measures have been pre-filed in many more. Below is this week’s edition of NORML’s Weekly Legislative Round Up — activists’ one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country. ** A note to first time readers: NORML can not introduce legislation in your state. Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation ‘by request’) can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" /><strong>Marijuana law reform legislation is pending in over twenty states</strong>, and progressive measures have been pre-filed in many more. Below is this week’s edition of NORML’s Weekly Legislative Round Up — activists’ one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country.</p>
<p>** A note to first time readers: NORML can not introduce legislation in your state. Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation ‘by request’) can do so. NORML can — and does — work closely with like-minded politicians and citizens to reform marijuana laws, and lobbies on behalf of these efforts. But ultimately the most effective way — and the only way — to successfully achieve statewide marijuana law reform is for local stakeholders and citizens to become involved in the political process and to make the changes they want to see.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Massachusetts:</strong> State lawmakers have reintroduced legislation, <strong>HB 1371, that seeks to legalize and regulate the “production, distribution, and sale” of marijuana to adults</strong>. The measure has been referred to the <a href="http://www.malegislature.gov/Committees/Joint/J19">Joint Committee on the Judiciary</a>. You can learn more about how to support this legislation by contacting <a href="http://www.masscann.org/">MassCann</a>, NORML&#8217;s Massachusetts affiliate <a href="http://www.masscann.org/legal-reform/60-politics/383-legalization-and-medical-bills-filed-in-massachusetts">here</a>. You can also contact your House and Senate members and urge them to support legalization by going <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=28792501">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Washington:</strong> On Tuesday, February 8, members of the House Committee on Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness <a href="http://www.kirotv.com/news/26796905/detail.html">heard</a> testimony in favor of <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24023501">HB 1550</a>, <strong>which allows for the state-authorized cultivation and distribution of marijuana and marijuana-related products</strong>. You can view archived video from this hearing <a href="http://www.tvw.org/media/mediaplayer.cfm?evid=2011020085&amp;TYPE=V&amp;CFID=2234752&amp;CFTOKEN=79032008&amp;bhcp=1">here</a>. <strong>The Committee is anticipated to vote on this measure on Friday, February 18</strong>. Last year the members of this Committee rejected a similar measure by a 6 to 2 vote.  Urge them this year to vote ‘yes.’ You may contact the members of this Committee <a href="http://www.leg.wa.gov/house/committees/PSEP/Pages/default.aspx">here</a> or contact your individual House member <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24023501">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Hawaii:</strong> Members of the Senate Joint Committee on Judiciary and Labor and members of the Senate Committee on Health on Friday, February 4 <strong>voted in favor of <a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/Bills/SB1460_.pdf">Senate Bill 1460</a>, which reduces the adult possession of up to one ounce of marijuana</strong> from a criminal misdemeanor (<a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&amp;Group_ID=4533">punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a $1,000 fine</a>) to a civil violation punishable by a fine of not more than $100. You can read NORML&#8217;s testimony in support of the bill <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8469">here</a>. You can contact your state lawmakers in support of the measure <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=25528506">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Maryland:</strong> Over 20 members of Maryland&#8217;s House of Delegates are backing legislation, <a href="http://mlis.state.md.us/2011rs/bills/hb/hb0606f.pdf"><strong>HB 606</strong></a><strong>, to reduce the adult possession of up to one ounce of marijuana</strong> from a criminal misdemeanor (<a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&amp;Group_ID=4542">punishable by one year in jail and a $1000 maximum fine</a>) to a civil offense, punishable by a $100 fine, no jail time, and no criminal record. House Bill 606 has been referred to the House <strong>Committee on the Judiciary and is scheduled for a hearing on Tuesday, February 22nd at 1pm.</strong> You may contact the members of the Committee <a href="http://mlis.state.md.us/Other/Roster/Committee.pdf">here</a>. You can follow the progress of HB 606 on Facebook <a href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/HB-606-Decriminalization-of-Cannabis-in-Maryland/145908818802471">here</a>. If you reside in Maryland, you can contact your Delegate in support of this legislation by clicking <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=27129561&amp;type=ST">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Indiana:</strong> Members of the Senate Committee on Corrections, Criminal, and Civil Matters on Tuesday <a href="http://www.wsbt.com/news/wsbt-proposal-to-study-ind-marijuana-laws-advances-20110215,0,5081864.story">voted 5 to 3</a> in favor of <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24011501&amp;type=ST">Senate Bill 192</a>, which calls for a <a href="http://www.indianastatesman.com/state-senator-proposes-study-of-indiana-s-marijuana-laws-1.1964872">legislative review</a> to be conducted by the Criminal Law and Sentencing Policy Study Committee later this year. <strong>The measure now awaits action from the full Senate.</strong> You can contact your state Senator and urge him or her to endorse the measure by clicking <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24011501&amp;type=ST">here</a>. Additional information on this and other marijuana law reform efforts in Indiana is available from Indiana NORML <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=4536&amp;wtm_view=chapter">here</a> or on Facebook <a href="http://www.facebook.com/IndianaNORML">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Montana:</strong> Bad news to report from Montana. On Thursday, February 10, members of House of Representatives <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=21950501">voted</a> 63 to 37 for HB 161, <strong>which would repeal the state’s existing medical cannabis law</strong>. The measure must be reapproved during a final House vote (third reading), which will likely take place imminently. If approved by the House, the measure then goes before the Senate. <strong>There has never been a single state medical marijuana law that has been repealed. Do not let Montana be the first.</strong> Please make sure that your state elected officials heard from you. You can contact him or her via the Montana NORML website <a href="http://www.montananorml.org/">here</a> or via NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=21950501">here</a>. You can also visit Patients and Families United Facebook page <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Patients-Families-United/182521988424944?v=wall">here</a> for up-to-date information on pending hearings and votes.</p></blockquote>
<p>To be in contact with your state officials regarding these measures and other pending legislation, please visit NORML’s Take Action Center <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/?style=D">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/02/16/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORML’s Weekly Legislative Round Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/01/28/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-12/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/01/28/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 06:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1550]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=5170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marijuana law reform legislation is pending in over a dozen states, and progressive measures have been pre-filed in many more. Below is this week’s edition of NORML’s Weekly Legislative Round Up — activists’ one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country. ** A note to first time readers: NORML can not introduce legislation in your state. Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation ‘by request’) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" class="alignright" width="225" height="306" /><strong>Marijuana law reform legislation is pending in over a dozen states</strong>, and progressive measures have been pre-filed in many more. Below is this week’s edition of NORML’s Weekly Legislative Round Up — activists’ one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country.</p>
<p>** A note to first time readers: NORML can not introduce legislation in your state. Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation ‘by request’) can do so. NORML can — and does — work closely with like-minded politicians and citizens to reform marijuana laws, and lobbies on behalf of these efforts. But ultimately the most effective way — and the only way — to successfully achieve statewide marijuana law reform is for local stakeholders and citizens to become involved in the political process and to make the changes they want to see.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Washington:</strong> A coalition of House lawmakers have introduced legislation, <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2011-12/Pdf/Bills/House%20Bills/1550.pdf"><strong>House Bill 1550</strong></a>, to legalize and regulate the “production, distribution, and sale” of marijuana to adults. <strong>“[T]he legislature intends to promote commerce and competition within Washington by eliminating penalties for the possession and consumption of cannabis, regulating and taxing the sale of cannabis by state government, and licensing cannabis growers,”</strong> it states. The measure has been referred to the House Committee on Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. You can contact the Committee and your own House member in support of HB 1550 by visiting NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action&#8217; page <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24023501">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Massachusetts:</strong> Legislation that seeks to legalize the adult recreational use of cannabis will be introduced in the Massachusetts House imminently. Separate legislation to allow for the physician supervised use of medical marijuana has also been pre-filed and will be reintroduced in both chambers this legislative session. Further details about these efforts and how to support them is available from MassCann, the Massachusetts affiliate of NORML, <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24059501">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Indiana:</strong> <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24011501"><strong>Senate Bill 192</strong></a>, which calls for a legislative review of state marijuana policies, is pending in the state Senate. Says the bill&#8217;s sponsor: “Every year, we spend countless dollars pursuing these non-violent offenders. This study would provide an assessment of the actual costs to our criminal justice system including the impact on law enforcement, prosecution, and sentencing. It will also provide members of the public with the opportunity to voice their opinions on the state’s current policies and other options for regulating marijuana.&#8221; To contact your state Senator in support of SB 192, please click <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24011501">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Oklahoma:</strong> State lawmakers for the first time will consider legislation that seeks to exempt qualified medical marijuana patients from statewide criminal penalties &#8212; <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&#038;Group_ID=4558">penalties</a> which are among the strictest in the nation. <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=23769501"><strong>Senate Bill 573</strong></a> seeks to create the “Compassionate Use Act of 2011” which states, &#8220;Oklahoma Statutes relating to the cultivation of marijuana shall not apply to a patient, or to a patient’s primary caregiver, who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician.” To support this effort, please click <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=23769501">here</a>. </p>
<p>Medical marijuana law reform bills were also introduced this week in <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=24183531"><strong>Delaware</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=23731511"><strong>Idaho</strong></a>, and were pre-filed in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/24/AR2011012406164.html"><strong>Maryland</strong></a>. For more information on ways to supprt these proposals, please visit NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action&#8217; page <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/?style=D">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Montana:</strong> On Tuesday, members of the House Judiciary Committee tabled <strong>House Bill 33</strong>, which sought to improperly define marijuana consumers as &#8220;drugged drivers&#8221; even if they are neither under the influence nor impaired to drive. NORML thanks those of you who took the time to call and e-mail members of this Committee and urged them to reject this draconian proposal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To be in contact with your state officials regarding these and other pending legislation, please visit NORML’s Take Action Center <a href="http://www.capwiz.com/norml2/issues/?style=D">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/01/28/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-round-up-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Morning Update &#8212; Voters Nationwide Decide Marijuana Law Reform Measures</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/03/voters-nationwide-decide-marijuana-law-reform-measures/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/03/voters-nationwide-decide-marijuana-law-reform-measures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conneciticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MassCann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measure 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measure 74]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 203]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shumlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=4577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Friday morning update!] In California, voters decided 46 percent to 54 percent, against Prop. 19, which sought to legalize the adult possession of limited quantities of marijuana in private, and to allow for local governments to regulate its commercial production and retail distribution. The 46+ percent (3,471,308 million Californians) voting ‘yes’ on Prop. 19 marks the greatest percentage of citizen support ever recorded on a statewide marijuana legalization effort. Commenting on the vote, NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano said that marijuana legalization is no longer a matter of ‘if,’ but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[Friday morning update!]</strong> In <strong>California</strong>, voters <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2010/results/ballot.measures/#">decided 46 percent to 54 percent</a>, against <a href="http://yeson19.com">Prop. 19</a>, which sought to legalize the adult possession of limited quantities of marijuana in private, and to allow for local governments to regulate its commercial production and retail distribution. The 46+ percent (3,471,308 million Californians) voting ‘yes’ on Prop. 19 marks the greatest percentage of citizen support ever recorded on a statewide marijuana legalization effort.</p>
<p>Commenting on the vote, NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano said that marijuana legalization is no longer a matter of ‘if,’ but a matter of ‘when.’</p>
<p><strong>“Social change doesn’t happen overnight, and in this case we are advocating for the repeal of a criminal policy that has existed for over 70 years federally and for nearly 100 years in California,&#8221;</strong> he said. &#8220;We are taking on the establishment and those who have vested interests in maintaining this longstanding failed policy. Yet, despite these odds, we have momentum and an unparalleled coalition of supporters – from <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/politics/local_elections&amp;id=7750096">law enforcement personnel</a>, to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alice-huffman/marijuana-law-reform-is-a_b_637001.html">civil rights groups</a>, to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/14/seiu-supports-marijuana-l_n_715979.html">organized labor</a>, to lawyers, clergy, and public health professionals. <strong>In just a few short months, this campaign <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/144086/New-High-Americans-Support-Legalizing-Marijuana.aspx">moved public opinion forward nationally</a>, and led to the signing of historic legislation here in California that will end the arrest and prosecution of tens of thousands of minor marijuana offenders.”</strong></p>
<p>He continued: “Throughout this campaign, even our opponents conceded that America’s present marijuana prohibition is a failure. They recognize that the question now isn’t ‘Should be legalize and regulate marijuana,’ but ‘How should we legalize and regulate marijuana?’”</p>
<p>He concluded: “In the near future there will be a slew of other states deciding on measures similar to Prop. 19 in their state houses and at the ballot box. <strong>And no doubt here in California, lawmakers in 2011 will once again be debating this issue, as will the voters in 2012.</strong>”</p>
<p><strong>Backers of the measure have already <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/03/BACQ1G6BNU.DTL">announced </a>plans for a similar campaign in 2012.</strong></p>
<p>In <strong>Arizona</strong>, voters are narrowly against <a href="http://stoparrestingpatients.org/home/">Proposition 203</a>, the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, which would permit state-registered patients to obtain cannabis legally from licensed facilities. <strong>But the gap is closing</strong>. As of Friday morning, the the race still remains <a href="http://election.townhall.com/election-2010/voter-initiative/">too close to call</a>, with Prop. 203 is trailing by less than 4,000 votes. With as many as <a href="http://blog.mpp.org/medical-marijuana/arizona-medical-marijuana-vote-still-too-close-to-call/11042010/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogmpp+%28MPP+Blog%29">300,000 ballots and provisional ballots left to be counted,</a> it could be <a href="http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/11/proposition_203_still_has_hope.php">several more days before election officials make an official decision</a>. The proposal is sponsored by the <a href="http://stoparrestingpatients.org/home/">Arizona Medical Marijuana Policy Project</a>, an affiliate of the <a href="http://www.mpp.org">Marijuana Policy Project</a>. Learn more about Proposition 203 here: <a href="http://stoparrestingpatients.org/home/">http://stoparrestingpatients.org/home/</a>.</p>
<p>In <strong>South Dakota</strong>, voters decided against <a href="http://sdcompassion.org/initiated-measure-13/">Measure 13</a>, the South Dakota Safe Access Act, which sought to exempt state criminal penalties for state-authorized patients who possessed marijuana.  South Dakota voters had previously rejected a similar proposal in 2006. It is the only state where voters have ever decided against a medical marijuana legalization initiative.</p>
<p>In <strong>Oregon</strong>, voters decided against <a href="http://coalitionforpatientsrights2010.com/">Measure 74</a>, The Oregon Regulate Medical Marijuana Supply System Act of 2010, which sought to create state-licensed not-for-profit facilities to assist in the production and distribution of marijuana to qualified patients. Oregon voters initially authorized the physician-authorized use of marijuana in 1998. Several states, including <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Colorado">Colorado</a>, <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#New%20Mexico">New Mexico</a>, and <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Maine">Maine</a>, have enacted statewide regulations licensing the production and dispensing of medical cannabis.</p>
<p>In other election developments that are pertinent to marijuana law reformers, <strong>California</strong> <strong> Democrat Kamala Harris is still narrowly leading Republican Steven Cooley for the office of state Attorney General</strong>. As of Friday morning, Harris is leading Cooley <a href="http://vote.sos.ca.gov/maps/attorney-general/">by less than one tenth of one percentage point</a> (some <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-attorney-general-20101105,0,4476074.story">9,000 total votes</a>) with 100 percent of precincts reporting. Yet with over two million ballots still left to count, The <em>L.A. Times</em> today <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-attorney-general-20101105,0,4476074.story">reports</a>, &#8220;With such a slim gap, the race for California&#8217;s top law enforcement office remained too close to call, and a clear winner may not emerge for days or even weeks.&#8221; Cooley is <em>opposed</em> by many marijuana reform organizations, including <a href="http://www.safeaccessnow.org/">Americans for Safe Access</a>, for his public <a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/speakeasy/2010/oct/28/steve_cooley_hates_medical_marij">opposition</a> to medical marijuana, and his contention that any retail sale of medical cannabis is in violation of state law.</p>
<p>Also, in <strong>California</strong>, voters <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/california-voters-reject-legalizing-marijuana-but-voters-in-10-cities-support-taxing-medicinal-pot.html">approved</a> citywide ordinances in <strong>Albany</strong> (Measure Q), <strong>Berkeley</strong> (Measure S), <strong>La Puente</strong> (Prop. M), <strong>Oakland</strong> (Measure V), <strong>Rancho Cordova</strong> (Measure O), <strong>Richmond</strong>, <strong>Sacramento</strong> (Measure C), <strong>San Jose</strong> (Measure U), <strong>Stockton</strong> (Measure I) to impose new taxes on medical marijuana sales and/or production and businesses licenses. California NORML, along with several other reform groups, specifically <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2010/11/03/3157123/weed-wars-suddenly-its-very-expensive.html">opposed the Rancho Cordova measure as an excessive penalty on medical cannabis growers</a>. Groups were divided in their support of many of the other local  proposals.</p>
<p>Voters in <strong>Berkeley</strong> also approved a separate ordinance (<a href="http://www.dailycal.org/article/111047/measures_s_t_expand_medical_marijuana_in_city">Measure T</a>) to permit a fourth medical marijuana dispensary in the city and reconstitute the city&#8217;s Medical Marijuana Commission Voters in <strong>Morro Bay</strong> and <strong>Santa Barbara</strong> <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/california-voters-reject-legalizing-marijuana-but-voters-in-10-cities-support-taxing-medicinal-pot.html">rejected</a> proposed municipal bans on dispensaries.</p>
<p><strong>New Mexico</strong> voters elected Republican Susan Martinez to be the state’s next Governor. While campaigning for the office, Martinez <a href="http://www.alamogordonews.com/ci_16481197">voiced opposition</a> to the state’s medical cannabis law, which since 2007 has allowed the state Department of Health to authorize medical marijuana users and third party, not-for-profit providers.</p>
<p>In <strong>Vermont</strong>, Democrat Peter Shumlin <a href="http://election.townhall.com/election-2010/governor/">narrowly leads</a> in the Governor&#8217;s race, with 91 percent of precincts reporting. While serving as state senator, Shumlin has been an <a href="http://blog.mpp.org/medical-marijuana/your-2010-marijuana-policy-election-day-scorecard/11012010/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogmpp+%28MPP+Blog%29">advocate</a> for both medical marijuana and decriminalization.</p>
<p><strong>Connecticut</strong> voters have <a href="http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Malloy-the-winner-Bysiewicz-declares-795879.php">narrowly elected</a> Democrat Dan Malloy for Governor. However, as of Friday morning, his Republican challenger Tom Foley appears ready to <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20021922-503544.html">legally challenge</a> the vote count. Malloy reportedly supports <a href="http://www.journalinquirer.com/articles/2010/07/07/chris_powell/doc4c348ee5033b2338886708.txt">decriminalizing marijuana</a> for adults, and also supports the legalization of medical cannabis. Malloy’s predecessor, Republican M. Jodi Rell, <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7285">vetoed</a> legislation in 2007 that would have allowed for the legal use of marijuana by those authorized by their physician.</p>
<p>In <strong>Massachusetts</strong>, voters in over 70 cities and towns decided <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/ballot_questions/results/#Regulate%20marijuana">favorably</a> on non-binding <a href="http://www.masscann.org/legal-reform/60-politics/356-how-we-are-doing-with-ppqs">public policy questions</a> regarding the taxation of the adult use of marijuana and the legalization of the physician-supervised use of medical cannabis. Approximately 13 percent of the state’s registered voters weighed in on the questions.</p>
<p>Finally, Dane County (Madison), Wisconsin voters <a href="http://www.channel3000.com/news/25628053/detail.html">resoundingly backed</a> a non-binding local initiative that asked,  &#8220;Should the Wisconsin Legislature enact legislation allowing residents with debilitating medical conditions to acquire and possess marijuana for medical purposes if supported by their physician?&#8221; Seventy-five percent of voters decided &#8216;yes&#8217; on the measure. In recent years, Wisconsin has been a highly contested battleground state in the fight for medical cannabis access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/03/voters-nationwide-decide-marijuana-law-reform-measures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>274</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters Nationwide To Decide On Marijuana Legalization Measures Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/01/voters-nationwide-to-decide-on-marijuana-legalization-measures-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/01/voters-nationwide-to-decide-on-marijuana-legalization-measures-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measure 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measure 74]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 203]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=4550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In California, voters will decide Proposition 19, The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010, which legalizes the adult possession of limited quantities of marijuana for adults in private, and allows local governments to regulate its commercial production and retail distribution. If passed, the measure would be the most expansive modern law ever enacted regarding the adult use, production, and distribution of marijuana. Learn more about Prop. 19 here: http://yeson19.com. In Arizona, voters will decide Proposition 203, the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, which permits state-registered patients to obtain cannabis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/YesButton.jpg" class="alignright" width="200" height="197" /></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p>In <strong>California</strong>, voters will decide <a href="http://yeson19.com/"><strong>Proposition 19</a>, The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010</strong>, which legalizes the adult possession of limited quantities of marijuana for adults in private, and allows local governments to regulate its commercial production and retail distribution. If passed, the measure would be the most expansive modern law ever enacted regarding the adult use, production, and distribution of marijuana.</p>
<p>Learn more about Prop. 19 here: <a href="http://yeson19.com">http://yeson19.com</a>.</p>
<p>In Arizona, voters will decide <a href="http://stoparrestingpatients.org/home/"><strong>Proposition 203</a>, the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act</strong>, which permits state-registered patients to obtain cannabis legally from licensed facilities. Authorized patients who do not have a state-licensed dispensary in their local area (defined as within 25 miles of their residence) would be permitted under the law to cultivate their own cannabis for medicinal purposes. Other patients would not be allowed to grow their own marijuana.</p>
<p>Learn more about Proposition 203 here: <a href="http://stoparrestingpatients.org/home/">http://stoparrestingpatients.org/home/</a>.</p>
<p>In <strong>South Dakota</strong>, voters will decide <a href="http://sdcompassion.org/initiated-measure-13/"><strong>Measure 13</a>, the South Dakota Safe Access Act</strong>, which exempts state criminal penalties for state-authorized patients who possess up to one ounce of marijuana or six cannabis plants. <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391">Fourteen states</a> and the <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#District%20of%20Columbia">District of Columbia </a>have enacted medical marijuana laws since 1996; ten have done so by voter initiative.</p>
<p>Learn more about Measure 13 here: <a href="http://sdcompassion.org/">http://sdcompassion.org/</a>.</p>
<p>In Oregon, voters will decide <a href="http://coalitionforpatientsrights2010.com/"><strong>Measure 74</a>, The Oregon Regulate Medical Marijuana Supply System Act of 2010</strong>, which creates state-licensed not-for-profit facilities to assist in the production and distribution of marijuana to qualified patients. Oregon voters initially authorized the physician-authorized use of marijuana in 1998. Several states, including <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Colorado">Colorado</a>, <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#New%20Mexico">New Mexico</a>, and <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Maine">Maine</a>, have enacted statewide regulations licensing the production and dispensing of medical cannabis.</p>
<p>Learn more about Measure 74 here: <a href="http://coalitionforpatientsrights2010.com/">http://coalitionforpatientsrights2010.com/</a>.</p>
<p>In <strong>Massachusetts</strong>, voters in <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8379"><strong>73 cities and towns</strong></a> will decide November 2 on non-binding <a href="http://www.masscann.org/legal-reform/60-politics/356-how-we-are-doing-with-ppqs">public policy questions</a> regarding the taxation of the adult use of marijuana and the legalization of the physician-supervised use of medical cannabis. Approximately <a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2010/sep/29/marijuana_questions_some_massach">13 percent</a> of the state&#8217;s registered voters will be weighing in on the questions. The results will likely influence the language of a proposed statewide, binding ballot measure in 2012.</p>
<p>Learn more about this campaign here: <a href="http://www.masscann.org/">http://www.masscann.org/</a>.</p>
<p><object width="450" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/doRymwwLdE0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/doRymwwLdE0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="450" height="315"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/01/voters-nationwide-to-decide-on-marijuana-legalization-measures-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DC police kill grandmother&#8217;s dog while serving drug warrant</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/06/18/dc-police-kill-grandmothers-dog-while-serving-drug-warrant/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/06/18/dc-police-kill-grandmothers-dog-while-serving-drug-warrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Belville, NORML Outreach Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LITIGATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dog shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humane Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PETA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=3582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please take a moment to sign the petition at http://CopsSayLegalizeDrugs.com/animals to protest the cruelty of the unnecessary killing of pet dogs by police during encounters with citizens. Today&#8217;s story of police canicide comes to us by way of the Associated Press (click to watch the video). A 62-year-old grandmother in Washington, DC tells AP that police came to her home serving a drug warrant for her 28-year-old grandson. The grandma asks to put her dog in the back yard or the bathroom. The cops tell her the bathroom would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please take a moment to sign the petition at <a href="http://CopsSayLegalizeDrugs.com/animals">http://CopsSayLegalizeDrugs.com/animals</a> to protest the cruelty of the unnecessary killing of pet dogs by police during encounters with citizens.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s story of police canicide comes to us by way of the Associated Press (<a href="http://www.thebostonchannel.com/video/23934405/index.html">click to watch the video</a>).  A 62-year-old grandmother in Washington, DC tells AP that police came to her home serving a drug warrant for her 28-year-old grandson.  The grandma asks to put her dog in the back yard or the bathroom.  The cops tell her the bathroom would be fine.  Later, the cops open the bathroom door, claim this 13-year-old dog named &#8220;Wrinkles&#8221; attacked them, and they shoot it multiple times.  By the way, the grandson hasn&#8217;t lived in the home for a dozen years and the only drugs cops found were what they claimed was &#8220;drug residue&#8221; on some baggies, which the grandma contends is the residue of fortune cookies.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/dog-killing-cop-2.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3583" title="dog killing cop 2" src="http://blog.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/dog-killing-cop-2-300x211.png" alt="" width="300" height="211" /></a>There was another heartbreaking dog killing by police in Lagrange, Missouri, caught on video that you can <a href="http://stash.norml.org/two-more-killings-of-dogs-by-police">view on our NORML Stash Blog</a>.  This incident did not involve a drug warrant, however.  Instead it was a report of an aggressive dog, who on video appeared to be quite calm and friendly, shot to death by an officer after the officer had it fully restrained by chain, noose, and pole.</p>
<p>If we can get the <a href="http://copssaylegalizedrugs.com/animals">signatures on the </a><a href="http://copssaylegalizedrugs.com/animals">signatures on the LEAP petition over 1,000</a>, supermodel <a href="http://stash.norml.org/help-norml-leap-supermodel-joanna-krupa-push-peta-humane-society-to-end-dog-shootings-in-drug-war">Joanna Krupa has agreed to deliver the petition</a> to both PETA and the Humane Society to increase the exposure of this all-too-common police procedure of killing family pets unnecessarily. (For more coverage of police dog killings in drug raids, check our <a href="http://stash.norml.org/tag/dog-shooting">Dog Shooting category at the NORML Stash Blog</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/06/18/dc-police-kill-grandmothers-dog-while-serving-drug-warrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORML’s Weekly Legislative Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/05/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/05/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. John Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawmakers around the country are debating a record number of marijuana law reform bills in 2010. NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up is your one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country, along with tips for influencing the policies of your state. ** To first time readers: NORML can not introduce legislation in your state. Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation &#8216;by request&#8217;) can do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORMLweed.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="318" />Lawmakers around the country are debating a record number of marijuana law reform bills in 2010. NORML&#8217;s Weekly Legislative Round Up is your one-stop guide to pending marijuana law reform legislation around the country, along with tips for influencing the policies of your state.</p>
<p>** To first time readers: <strong>NORML can not introduce legislation in your state.</strong> Nor can any other non-profit advocacy organization. Only your state representatives, or in some cases an individual constituent (by way of their representative; this is known as introducing legislation &#8216;by request&#8217;) can do so.  NORML can &#8212; and does &#8212; work closely with like-minded politicians and citizens to reform marijuana laws, and lobbies on behalf of these efforts. <strong>But ultimately the most effective way &#8212; and the only way &#8212; to successfully achieve statewide marijuana law reform is for local stakeholders and citizens to become involved in the political process and make the changes they want to see. </strong>We can&#8217;t do it without you.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Hawaii:</strong> Senate lawmakers approved a series of bills last week that seek to reform the state&#8217;s marijuana laws. Senators <strong>voted unopposed</strong> in favor of <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14755936">SB 2450</a>, which <strong>seeks to reduce penalties for the adult possession of up to one ounce of marijuana</strong> from a <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&amp;Group_ID=4533">criminal misdemeanor</a> punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a $1,000 fine to a civil offense. You can read NORML&#8217;s recent commentary and testimony in favor of this measure <a href="http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?b78fb4f4-2b1b-4a1e-81f4-bf647b9d13bc">here</a> and <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8109">here</a>. You can voice your support for the measure <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14755936">here</a>.</p>
<p>Senators this week also approved <a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2010/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&amp;billnumber=2141">Senate Bill 2141</a>, an act to increase the quantities of medical marijuana that a patient may legally possess under state law to <strong>ten plants and five ounces</strong> at any given time. <strong>Lawmakers approved the proposal by a 24 to 1 vote.</strong> Lawmakers also voted in favor of <a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2010/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&amp;billnumber=2213">SB 2213</a>, which would establish &#8216;compassion centers&#8217; to provide medical marijuana to authorized patients. All three measures are now before the House for consideration. You can learn more about these proposals <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14583681">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Washington:</strong> House lawmakers on Wednesday, March 3, <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011260605_potbill05m.html">voted</a> 58 – 40 in favor of an amended version of <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5798&amp;year=2009">Senate Bill 5798</a>, which would expand the state’s nearly twelve-year-old <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Washington">medical marijuana law</a>. Because the House made minor amendments to the bill, it now must be re-approved by the Senate — who previously had 37 to 11 in favor of the bill in February. If enacted, <strong>SB 5798 will allow additional health care professionals – including naturopaths, physician’s assistants, osteopathic physicians, and advanced registered nurse practitioners – to legally recommend marijuana therapy to their patients.</strong> Under present law, only licensed physicians may legally recommend medicinal cannabis. To learn more about this measure, please visit NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action&#8217; Center <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14676831">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Rhode Island:</strong> House lawmakers this week for the first time introduced legislation to legalize the production, distribution, and personal use of marijuana for adults age 21 and older. As introduced, <a href="http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText10/HouseText10/H7838.htm">House Bill 7838</a>: The Taxation and Regulation of Marijuana Act, would <strong>exempt adults from any statewide criminal or civil penalty for the possession of up to one ounce of marijuana</strong>, engaging in the not-for-profit transfer of small amounts of marijuana, and/or the cultivation of up to three marijuana plants. The proposal also establishes licensing requirements for the commercial cultivation and distribution of marijuana via retail facilities. The measure states that “at least one” marijuana retailer shall exist per county within one year following the passage of this act. To learn how you can support this act, please visit <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14754336">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>New Hampshire:</strong> Next Wednesday, March 10, House lawmakers are scheduled to vote on <a href="http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/HB1653.html">House Bill 1653</a>,  which would amend penalties for possession of marijuana from a <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?wtm_view=&amp;Group_ID=4551">criminal misdemeanor</a>, punishable by up to one year in jail and a $2,000 fine, <strong>to a civil offense </strong>punishable by no more than $200.00. Members of the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee previously voted 16 to 2 in favor of passing the bill, and NORML anticipates that House lawmakers will do the same. <strong>However, Democrat Gov. John Lynch has <a href="http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Panel+OK's+idea+to+ease+pot+penalty&amp;articleId=d3b39ee4-d005-4b34-a545-3a2f802c5406">threatened to veto</a> the measure.</strong> Contact information and talking points for Gov. Lynch may be found at NORML&#8217;s &#8216;Take Action Center&#8217; <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=14521131">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Massachusetts:</strong> The <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/comm/j19.htm">Joint Committee on Judiciary</a> held a hearing on Tuesday to debate <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12975651">SB 1801</a>, which seeks to &#8220;regulate and tax the cannabis industry&#8221; in Massachusetts. <strong>You can watch video from the hearing <a href="http://www.masscann.org/legal-reform/60-politics/333-video-from-judiciary-committee-hearing-on-s-1801-tax-and-regulate">here</a>,</strong> and you can contact your state elected officials in support of the measure <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12975651">here</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>For information on additional state and federal marijuana law reform legislation, please visit NORML’s ‘Take Action Center’ <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/03/05/norml%e2%80%99s-weekly-legislative-update-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

