<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; nobody goes to jail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/nobody-goes-to-jail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If Cops Really Oppose Sending Minor Pot Offenders To Jail, Then Why Do They Vehemently Oppose Efforts To Keep Us Free?</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2008/09/19/if-cops-really-oppose-sending-minor-pot-offenders-to-jail-then-why-do-they-vehemently-oppose-efforts-to-keep-us-free/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2008/09/19/if-cops-really-oppose-sending-minor-pot-offenders-to-jail-then-why-do-they-vehemently-oppose-efforts-to-keep-us-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LITIGATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Walters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobody goes to jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2008/09/19/if-cops-really-oppose-sending-minor-pot-offenders-to-jail-then-why-do-they-vehemently-oppose-efforts-to-keep-us-free/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters in Massachusetts will decide this November on Question 2, which seeks to replace criminal penalties for the possession of up to one ounce of marijuana with a civil fine of no more than $100. Polls show that nearly three-out-of-four voters back the measure. Who opposes it? That&#8217;s an easy one. Who else? Officials unite to fight marijuana initiative via The Boston Globe Law enforcement officials statewide are uniting against a referendum question they fear will increase marijuana use among teenagers and generate more crime across the state. The state&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.appletreeblog.com/wp-content/2007/07/keystone-cops.jpg" align="right" height="161" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="200" />Voters in Massachusetts will decide this November on <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7645">Question 2</a>, which seeks to replace criminal penalties for the possession of up to one ounce of marijuana with a civil fine of no more than $100. Polls show that nearly <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7688">three-out-of-four voters back the measure</a>.</p>
<p>Who opposes it?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an easy one. Who else?</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/09/17/officials_unite_to_fight_marijuana_initiative/">Officials unite to fight marijuana initiative</a></strong><br />
via <em>The Boston Globe</em></p>
<p>Law enforcement officials statewide are uniting against a referendum question they fear will increase marijuana use among teenagers and generate more crime across the state.</p>
<p>The state&#8217;s 11 district attorneys are unanimously opposing Question 2 and are being joined by police chiefs and some community groups, fearing it will undo years of effort to reduce drug use among teenagers.</p>
<p>&#8230; &#8220;Nobody goes to jail today for simple possession of marijuana,&#8221; said Essex District Attorney Jonathan Blodgett, who is listed as the treasurer for the opponents, who are using the name Coalition for Safe Streets during the campaign.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmm, where have I heard this before?  Oh yeah.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://blog.norml.org/2008/09/16/the-irony-and-the-idiocy/">The irony and the idiocy</a></strong><br />
via the NORML blog</p>
<p>Just days before the FBI released statistics indicating that police in 2007 arrested over <a href="http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/98952">872,000 Americans</a> — the most ever reported in law enforcement history — for violating pot laws, reigning Drug Czar (and pathological liar) John Walters alleged on C-Span, “We didn’t arrest 800,000 marijuana users. … That’s [a] lie.”</p>
<p>(Watch the video of Walters’ remarks <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WNpQQeYELs">here</a>.)</p>
<p>The Czar’s nose grew another six inches when he uncorked this whopper: “The fact is today, people don’t go to jail for the possession of marijuana. Finding somebody in jail or prison for possession of marijuana is like finding a <a href="http://stash.norml.org/2008/09/16/pass-the-stash-find-the-marijuana-unicorns/">unicorn</a>. It doesn’t exist.”</p>
<p>(The video can be seen <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fBA_L9B2go">here</a>.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Pardon me if I&#8217;m confused. On the one hand, you have law enforcement claiming that nobody goes to jail for pot possession. On the other hand, you have law enforcement actively <em>opposing</em> any and all efforts to reform America&#8217;s marijuana laws so that, in fact, nobody would actually go to jail for pot possession.</p>
<p>Question: Why do cops vehemently oppose measures that seek to comport the law in line with what they claim is already standard prosecutorial  practice?</p>
<p>Is the answer:</p>
<p>a) The cops are full of it; people <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7071">go to jail for violating marijuana laws</a> all the time.</p>
<p>b) If cops stopped arresting minor pot offenders <a href="http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/local/cop_suspension_case_testimony_takes_lurid_turn_in_reponse_to_blunt_questions_08-21-2008.html">they wouldn&#8217;t know what else to do</a> with their time.</p>
<p>or c) Most cops really believe marijuana consumers are &#8220;<a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle_blog/2008/jul/31/hey_dirtbags_ya_wanna_know_what_">dirt bags</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle_blog/2008/jul/31/hey_dirtbags_ya_wanna_know_what_">losers</a>&#8221; who belong in jail.</p>
<p>Answer: Take your pick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2008/09/19/if-cops-really-oppose-sending-minor-pot-offenders-to-jail-then-why-do-they-vehemently-oppose-efforts-to-keep-us-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

