<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; nonseminoma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/nonseminoma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Media Hysterics About Supposed Cancer Link Nothing New</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/02/10/media-hysterics-about-supposed-cancer-link-nothing-new/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/02/10/media-hysterics-about-supposed-cancer-link-nothing-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCIENCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonseminoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testicular cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/2009/02/10/media-hysterics-about-supposed-cancer-link-nothing-new/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It must have been a slow news day. According to Google News, more than 750 media outlets &#8212; that&#8217;s 7-5-0, folks &#8212; have now weighed in on this week&#8217;s pot scare story du jour: &#8220;Smoking marijuana causes testicular cancer.&#8221; So is there any truth behind the provocative headline? Some, but hardly enough to justify the media&#8217;s feeding frenzy. Researchers at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research in Seattle matched 369 men with of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) with 979 healthy controls. Here&#8217;s what they found. Men who self-reported having &#8220;ever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://norml.org/images/blog/cannabis_flower.jpg" align="right" height="260" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="198" />It must have been a slow news day.</p>
<p>According to Google News, more than 750 media outlets &#8212; that&#8217;s 7-5-0, folks &#8212; have now weighed in on this week&#8217;s pot scare story du jour: &#8220;<a href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/healthreport/archives/161589.asp">Smoking marijuana causes testicular cancer</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>So is there any truth behind the provocative headline? Some, but hardly enough to justify the media&#8217;s feeding frenzy.</p>
<p>Researchers at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research in Seattle matched 369 men with of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) with 979 healthy controls. Here&#8217;s what they <a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121685776/abstract">found</a>.</p>
<p>Men who self-reported having &#8220;ever used&#8221; marijuana <strong>had no statistically significant risk</strong> of testicular cancer compared to healthy controls who never used pot.</p>
<p>Men who reported currently using marijuana at least once per week, and who had started smoking pot prior to age 18, <strong>had an elevated risk</strong> compared to controls of contracting a type of testicular cancer known as nonseminoma.</p>
<p>Sounds scary, huh?  Well here&#8217;s the catch.</p>
<p>According to the federal government, millions of people smoke marijuana regularly. By contrast, diagnoses of nonseminoma, which typically affects males between the ages of 15 and 34, are extremely rare.</p>
<p>How rare?</p>
<p>Nonseminomas account for <strong>fewer</strong> than one half of one percent of all cancers among American men.</p>
<p>Further undermining the study&#8217;s hypothesis is this: Since the 1970s, the percentage of American males smoking pot has climbed dramatically. By contrast, incidences of nonseminoma have risen only nominally during this same time period.</p>
<p>Of course, this is hardly the first time the mainstream media has jumped ugly on cannabis. Around this same time last year, news outlets from <em>Reuters</em> to <em>Fox News</em> declared that marijuana posed a greater cancer risk than cigarettes. Only problem was that the study they were reporting on actually demonstrated <a href="http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/78886/">the opposite</a>.</p>
<p>So why does the mainstream media continue to get the story wrong when it comes to pot? Good question. You can read my abbreviated answer <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2008/05/15/sloppy-journalism-to-blame-for-pot-prohibition/">here</a>. And while you&#8217;re on NORML&#8217;s site, get the skinny on what the scientific literature really has to say about any potential links between marijuana and cancer <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6891">here</a>, <a href="http://www.norml.org//index.cfm?Group_ID=7008">here</a>, and <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6814">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/02/10/media-hysterics-about-supposed-cancer-link-nothing-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

