<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; Oakland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/oakland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s One Million Legalized Marijuana Users</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Belville, NORML Outreach Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAMILIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dale Gieringer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Lichty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Coast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=6077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Least 1 &#8211; 1.5 Million Americans are Legal Medical Marijuana Patients Market for these patients in sixteen states and D.C. estimated at between $2 &#8211; $6 billion annually MAY 31, 2011 - We don&#8217;t know his or her name, but somewhere in one of sixteen states and the District of Columbia is America&#8217;s 1,000,000th legal medical marijuana patient. We estimate the United States reached the million-patients mark sometime between the beginning of the year to when Arizona began issuing patient registry identification cards online in April 2011. Between one to one-and-a-half million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>At Least 1 &#8211; 1.5 Million Americans are Legal Medical Marijuana Patients</strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Market for these patients in sixteen states and D.C. estimated at between $2 &#8211; $6 billion annually</em></strong></p>
<p>MAY 31, 2011 - We don&#8217;t know his or her name, but somewhere in one of sixteen states and the District of Columbia is <strong>America&#8217;s 1,000,000th legal medical marijuana patient.</strong> We estimate the United States reached the million-patients mark sometime between the beginning of the year to when <a href="http://stash.norml.org/arizona-medical-marijuana-program-opens-first-online-only-registration">Arizona began issuing patient registry identification cards online in April 2011</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_23836" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Marijuana-States-of-America-2011-05-Full.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-23836" title="Marijuana States of America - 2011-05 Full" src="http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Marijuana-States-of-America-2011-05-Full-150x93.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="93" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">16 states, the Capitol, and ONE MILLION legal marijuana users.</p></div>
<p>Between one to one-and-a-half million people are legally authorized by their state to use marijuana in the United States, according to data compiled by NORML from state medical marijuana registries and patient estimates.  Assuming usage of one-half to one gram of cannabis medicine per day per patient and an <a href="http://www.priceofweed.com/">average retail price of $320 per ounce</a>, <strong>these legal consumers represent a $2.3 to $6.2 billion dollar market annually.</strong></p>
<p>Based on state medical marijuana laws, the amounts of cannabis these legal marijuana users are entitled to possess means there is between 566 &#8211; 803 thousand pounds of legal usable cannabis <em>allowed under state law</em> in America.  These patients are allowed to cultivate between 17 &#8211; 24 million legal cannabis plants.  There may possibly be more, as California and New Mexico &#8220;limits&#8221; may be exceeded with doctor&#8217;s permission and some California counties explicitly allow greater amounts, so <strong>there may be as much as 1 million pounds of state-legal cannabis <em>allowed under state law</em> in America.</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#cccccc">
<td><strong><a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391">Active Medical Marijuana State</a> </strong>(Total population of sixteen medical marijuana states + D.C. = over 90 million.  D.C., Delaware, and New Jersey programs are not yet active.)</td>
<td># Legal Medical Marijuana Patients (% of state population)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>California </strong>(1996) - No central state registry, 2% &#8211; 3% of overall population estimate by Dale Gieringer at California NORML by comparing rates in Colorado &amp; Montana.</td>
<td>~<strong>750,000 </strong>(2.00%)</p>
<p><em>~1,125,000 (3.00%)</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Washington </strong>(1998) - No registry, 1% &#8211; 1.5% of overall population estimate by Russ Belville at NORML by comparing rates in Oregon &amp; Colorado.</td>
<td>~<strong>67,000</strong> (1.00%)</p>
<p><em>~100,000 (1.50%)</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Oregon </strong>(1998) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://public.health.oregon.gov/DISEASESCONDITIONS/CHRONICDISEASE/MEDICALMARIJUANAPROGRAM/Pages/data.aspx">39,774</a> </strong>(1.04%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Alaska </strong>(1998) - No data online, verified by author&#8217;s call to Alaska Bureau of Vital Statistics.</td>
<td><strong>380 </strong>(0.05%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Maine </strong>(1999) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/dlrs/reports/mmm-program-report-3-2011.pdf">796</a> </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Nevada </strong>(2000) - 2008 figures from ProCon.org, awaiting return call from state for official number.</td>
<td><strong>860 </strong>(0.03%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Hawaii </strong>(2000) - Estimate from Pam Lichty of Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii; program is run by law enforcement who are reluctant to release data.</td>
<td>~<strong>8,000 </strong>(0.59%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colorado </strong>(2000) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/hs/medicalmarijuana/statistics.html">123,890</a> </strong>(2.46%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Vermont </strong>(2004) - No data online, verified by author&#8217;s call to Vermont Criminal Information Center.</td>
<td><strong>349 </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Montana </strong>(2004) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/medicalmarijuana/MMPRegistryInformation.pdf">30,609</a> </strong>(3.09%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Rhode Island </strong>(2006) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.health.ri.gov/publications/programreports/MedicalMarijuana2011.pdf">3,069</a> </strong>(0.29%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>New Mexico </strong>(2007) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.health.state.nm.us/IDB/medicalcannabis/Medical%20Cannabis%20Numbers%20as%20of%205-5-11.pdf">3,615</a> </strong>(0.18%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Michigan</strong> (2008) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.michigan.gov/lara/0,1607,7-154-27417_51869---,00.html">75,521</a> </strong>(0.76%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Arizona </strong>(2010) - Centralized state registry data published online.</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.azdhs.gov/medicalmarijuana/documents/reports/110524_Patient-Application-Report.pdf">3,696</a> </strong>(0.06%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>TOTAL US LEGAL MARIJUANA USERS</strong></td>
<td>~<strong>1,100,000 </strong>(1.22%)</p>
<p><em>~1,500,000 (1.67%)</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Yet after fifteen years, one million patients, and a million pounds of legal marijuana, few if any of the dire predictions by opponents of medical marijuana have come to fruition.  Medical marijuana states like Oregon are experiencing their <a href="http://stash.norml.org/oregon-reports-lowest-rates-of-workplace-illness-and-injury-ever-recorded">lowest-ever rates of workplace fatalities, injuries, and accidents</a>.  States like Colorado are experiencing their <a href="http://stash.norml.org/denver-posts-editorial-board-raises-reefer-madness-fears-of-stoned-drivers">lowest rates in three decades of fatal crashes per million miles driven</a>.  In <a href="http://www.ukcia.org/research/ImpactOfStateMMJLaws.pdf">medical marijuana states for which we have data</a> (through Michigan in 2008), use by minor teenagers is down in all but Maine and down by at least 10% in states with the greatest proportion of their population using medical cannabis.<span id="more-6077"></span></p>
<table style="width: 100%;" border="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#cccccc">
<td><strong>Medical Marijuana State</strong></td>
<td>Age 12-17 Monthly Use When Passed</td>
<td>Age 12-17 <a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k8State/AppB.htm">Monthly Use in 2008</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/States/StatesCrashesAndAllVictims.aspx">Highway Fatalities When Passed</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/States/StatesCrashesAndAllVictims.aspx">Highway Fatalities in 2009</a></td>
<td>Workplace Injuries / Illness When Passed</td>
<td>Workplace Injuries / Illness in 2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>California</strong> (1996)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">7.70%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>6.86%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3,989</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>3,081</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr966ca.pdf">7.1%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096ca.pdf"> 4.2%</a></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Washington</strong> (1996)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">9.90%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.17%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">662</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>492</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986wa.pdf">9.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096wa.pdf"> </a><strong><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096wa.pdf">5.3%</a></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Oregon</strong> (1998)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">9.60%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.22%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">538</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>377</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986or.pdf"> 6.8%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096or.pdf"><strong> 4.5%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Alaska</strong> (1998)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">10.40%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.03%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">70</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>64</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr986ak.pdf"> 7.4%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096ak.pdf"> <strong>4.6%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Maine </strong>(1999)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/99YouthState/appd.htm">7.20%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">9.06%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">181</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>159</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr996me.pdf"> 8.8%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096me.pdf"> <strong>5.6%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Nevada</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">9.54%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.52%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">323</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>243</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr006nv.pdf"> 7.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096nv.pdf"><strong> 4.4%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Hawaii</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">8.72%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>7.07%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">132</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>109</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr006hi.pdf"> 6.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096hi.pdf"> <strong>4.2%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colorado</strong> (2000)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2kState/vol1/appA.htm">10.80%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>9.10%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">681</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>465</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Vermont</strong> (2004)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k4State/appB.htm#TabB.3">11.11%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>10.86%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">98</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>74</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr046vt.pdf"> 5.6%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096vt.pdf"> <strong>5.1%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Montana</strong> (2004)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k4State/appB.htm#TabB.3">10.00%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.60%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">229</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>221</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr046mt.pdf"> 7.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096mt.pdf"> <strong>5.3%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Rhode Island</strong> (2006)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k6state/AppB.htm">9.74%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>9.46%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">81</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">83</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr066ri.pdf"> 5.2%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>New Mexico</strong> (2007)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k7State/AppB.htm">8.73%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>8.19%</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">413</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>361</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr076nm.pdf"> 5.0%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096nm.pdf"> <strong>4.8%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Michigan</strong> (2008)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">7.36%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">980</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><strong>871</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr086mi.pdf"> 4.5%</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/pr096mi.pdf"> <strong>4.2%</strong></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img title="More..." src="http://blog.norml.org/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" />Fourteen of the seventeen medical marijuana jurisdictions have mandatory registries while two (California and Colorado) offer optional registries and one (Washington) has no registry system.  Estimating California&#8217;s patient numbers is hampered by its registry system being on a county-by-county basis.  California NORML&#8217;s Dale Gieringer estimates between 2% &#8211; 3% of the state&#8217;s population are holding medical marijuana recommendations &#8211; meaning possibly <strong>over one million medical marijuana patients in California alone.</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>California&#8217;s patient population can be estimated from data from other medical marijuana states where patients are required to register, shown in the table below. The top two of these are Colorado and Montana, which, like California, have a well developed network of cannabis clinics and dispensaries, and which report usage rates of 2.5% and 3.0%, respectively. Other states, where medical marijuana is less developed, report lower rates of 1% and less. However, <strong>California is likely to be on the high side because it has the oldest and most liberal law in the nation.</strong> Significantly, California is the only state that permits marijuana to be used for any condition for which it provides relief &#8211; in particular, psychiatric disorders, such as PTSD, bipolar disorder, ADD, anxiety and depression, which account for some 20%-25% of the total patient population. Adjusting for this, usage in California could be as much as 25% to 33% higher than in Colorado and Montana, which would put it well over 3% of the population (1,125,000).</p>
<p>A 2%+ patient population estimate is supported by data from the <a href="http://www.patientidcenter.org/" target="_blank">Oakland Patient ID Center</a>, which has been issuing patient identification cards to its members since 1996. The OPIDC serves patients from all over the state, but especially the greater Oakland-East Bay area of Northern California, where its cards are honored by law enforcement. As of 2010, the OPIDC had issued ID&#8217;s to 19,805 members from five East Bay cities <strong>(Oakland, Berkeley, Alameda, Hayward and Richmond), amounting to 2.4% of the local population.</strong>Because the cards were issued over a period of 14 years, they include numerous patients who have lapsed, moved, or deceased. On the other hand, they do not include many other local patients who have current recommendations but never registered with the OPIDC.</p></blockquote>
<p>We have made a similar estimate for Washington State&#8217;s patients, who are the only ones in the nation with no registry system in place (Gov. Gregoire recently signed a bill that initiates a voluntary registry).  With a law very similar to Oregon&#8217;s concerning qualifying conditions, <strong>applying Oregon&#8217;s 1.04% patient population figure gives us about 69,000 patients in Washington.</strong> However, Washington State&#8217;s larger urban centers (Seattle and Spokane), combined with a more liberal law than Oregon&#8217;s regarding who can sign recommendations (osteopaths, naturopaths, and nurse practitioners can recommend in Washington) and the lack of a state registry&#8217;s burden to patient compliance with the program suggests a higher estimate of 1.5% &#8211; 2% may be appropriate.  Numbers like Colorado&#8217;s 2.5% and Montana&#8217;s 3% are improbable as Washington lacks the greater patient access to dispensaries seen in those states.</p>
<p>Delaware, New Jersey, and D.C.&#8217;s programs are not operational yet, so they are not shown in our data table.  Most of the other state&#8217;s programs produce reports of patient registry numbers.  With Arizona signing up over 3,600 patients since mid-April, when it&#8217;s online-only registration went into effect, <strong>Arizona is on track to register over 30,000 patients this year.</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Quick Facts about Medical Marijuana States:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The 1.1 &#8211; 1.5 million estimated and registered medical marijuana patients in America are legally entitled to cultivate 17 &#8211; 24 million cannabis plants and possess 283 &#8211;  402 tons of harvested buds.</li>
<li>The seventeen jurisdictions with medical marijuana encompass over 90 million Americans and 162 votes in the <a href="http://www.270towin.com/">2012 Electoral College</a>.</li>
<li>Patients make up over 3% of the population of Montana, almost 2.5% of Colorado, over 2% of California. and over 1% of Oregon, and Washington.</li>
<li>After Michigan at 0.76% of population, every other medical marijuana state has less than 3 in 1,000 (0.3%) patients in its population.</li>
<li>California, Colorado, Washington, Michigan, Oregon, and Montana comprise over 98% of the legal medical marijuana patients in America.</li>
<li>More than 3 out of four (77% &#8211; 83%) of all medical marijuana patients live on the West Coast.</li>
<li>Rhode Island and Vermont, two states where over 10% of the adult population uses marijuana monthly, have patient populations of 0.29% and 0.05%, respectively.</li>
<li>Monthly teen use of marijuana is down in every medical marijuana state except Maine.</li>
<li>Annual highway fatalities are down in every medical marijuana state except Rhode Island.</li>
<li>Incidents of workplace injuries and illnesses are down in every medical marijuana state.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2011/05/31/americas-one-million-legalized-marijuana-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Opposes Oakland&#8217;s Medical Marijuana Grow Plan, Threatens Potential Statewide Crackdown</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/12/07/obama-administration-opposes-oaklands-medical-marijuana-grow-plan-threatens-potential-statewide-crackdown/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/12/07/obama-administration-opposes-oaklands-medical-marijuana-grow-plan-threatens-potential-statewide-crackdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Russo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Leonhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 215]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=4775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama administration officials strongly oppose plans by the city of Oakland to license and tax industrial sized medical cannabis producers, according to a just published report on CaliforniaWatch.org, the website of the Center for Investigative Reporting. Sources at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the United States attorney’s office in San Francisco said that federal officials would likely pursue criminal or civil litigation against local marijuana growers as well as Oakland city officials if they decide to move forward with plans to license medical cannabis farming. “Oakland would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/DEAlogo.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="217" />Obama administration officials strongly oppose plans by the city of Oakland to license and tax industrial sized medical cannabis producers, according to a just published <a href="http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/obama-administration-warns-oakland-pot-farms-7234">report</a> on CaliforniaWatch.org, the website of the Center for Investigative Reporting.</p>
<p>Sources at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the United States attorney’s office in San Francisco said that <strong>federal officials would likely pursue criminal or civil litigation against local marijuana growers as well as Oakland city officials</strong> if they decide to move forward with plans to license medical cannabis farming. “Oakland would be on the hook for violating state and federal law,” an unnamed administration official <a href="http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/obama-administration-warns-oakland-pot-farms-7234">told</a> the website.</p>
<p>Oakland City Attorney John Russo confirmed that DOJ officials are opposed to the city’s licensing plan. “They&#8217;ve expressed their concerns that the path Oakland is taking is in violation of the law,” Russo said in a prepared statement.</p>
<p>Oakland officials are <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-07-21-oakland-pot-farms_N.htm">seeking to license up to four industrial-sized medical marijuana grow operations</a> within the city limits. The permits <a href="http://www.newser.com/story/105878/california-cities-scramble-to-launch-pot-farms.html">do not set limits</a> regarding the quantity of cannabis that licensed producers may cultivate at each given site. City officials began <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8407">accepting applications</a> from prospective growers in November.</p>
<p><strong>According to the California Watch report, federal officials are also planning to initiate a broader crack down on marijuana production and distribution statewide.</strong> The story <a href="http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/obama-administration-warns-oakland-pot-farms-7234">reports</a> that DOJ and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) officials met with California’s four U.S. attorneys on November 10 “to develop a plan to deal with some of the loopholes and gray areas in the state’s medical marijuana program.”</p>
<p>The administration’s threats appear to be in conflict with an October 19, 2009 DOJ memo <a href="http://blogs.usdoj.gov/blog/archives/192">stating</a>, “As a general matter, pursuit of [federal law enforcement] priorities should not focus federal resources … on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.” Nevertheless, as previously reported by <a href="http://www.safeaccessnow.org">Americans for Safe Access</a> and <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/129219-obamas-pick-to-head-dea-needs-to-answer-some-tough-questions">others</a>, the administration since issuing that memo has engaged in an estimated <a href="http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=6192">30 federal raids</a> of medical marijuana providers, producers, and laboratory facilities that engage in the testing of cannabis potency and quality.</p>
<p><em>NORML will have further details on this story in Thursday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3442">weekly media advisory</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/12/07/obama-administration-opposes-oaklands-medical-marijuana-grow-plan-threatens-potential-statewide-crackdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pot Taxes Are Coming To California</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/10/pot-taxes-are-coming-to-california/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/10/pot-taxes-are-coming-to-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Puente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rancho Cordova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=4662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite last week&#8217;s defeat of Proposition 19 at the polls, new taxes on marijuana are coming to California. As I write today in High Times online, California voters on election day by wide margins endorsed citywide medical marijuana tax ordinances in Albany, Berkeley, La Puente, Oakland, Rancho Cordova, Richmond, Sacramento, San Jose, and Stockton. You can read the full details of each of these tax measures, as well as Los Angeles&#8217; latest medi-pot tax plan, here. While the bulk of these new tax plans impose fees on the dispensaries themselves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/marijuana_bud.jpg" class="alignright" width="175" height="242" />Despite last week&#8217;s defeat of Proposition 19 at the polls, new taxes on marijuana are coming to California.</p>
<p>As I <a href="http://hightimes.com/legal/ht_admin/6808">write today</a> in High Times online, California voters on election day by wide margins <strong>endorsed citywide medical marijuana tax ordinances in Albany, Berkeley, La Puente, Oakland, Rancho Cordova, Richmond, Sacramento, San Jose, and Stockton.</strong> You can read the full details of each of these tax measures, as well as <a href="http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2010/11/los_angeles_marijuana_tax.php">Los Angeles&#8217; latest medi-pot tax plan</a>, <a href="http://hightimes.com/legal/ht_admin/6808">here</a>.</p>
<p>While the bulk of these new tax plans impose fees on the dispensaries themselves &#8212; fees that will no doubt indirectly be passed on to the consumer via higher retail prices for cannabis &#8212; at least one plan (Rancho Cordova&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/weed-wars/2010/11/suddenly-its-very-expensive-to-grow-weed-in-rancho-cordova.html">Measure O</a>) seeks to impact patients directly by instituting local fees on personal home grows. </p>
<p>While it is possible (read: likely) that this exorbitant fee will be eventually struck down by the courts as an undue infringement upon patients’ rights under Prop. 215, it could be months or years before such a clarification by the courts is made.</p>
<p>Patient advocacy groups like <a href="http://www.safeaccessnow.org/">Americans For Safe Access</a> oppose the implementation of such medi-tax laws, noting that they could unduly raise the already inflated black market price of medical cannabis, lead to fewer dispensaries, and ultimately limit patients’ access. Nonetheless, it is hardly surprising to see a majority of Californians, at a time of record budget deficits, voting to impose additional taxes upon a minority subset of their community.</p>
<p><strong>In short, the success of these tax measures at the ballot box is yet further evidence that with or without Prop. 19, more and more city governments &#8212; rightly or wrongly &#8212; are going to be looking at new ways to raise revenue from California’s burgeoning cannabis industry and its consumers.</strong> Industry insiders and those they represent, patients especially, would be best advised to begin playing an active role in their local politics, or else risk suffering the consequences of unreasonable taxation without representation.</p>
<p>You can read my full thoughts on this developing issue, and comment on it, by clicking here: <a href="http://hightimes.com/legal/ht_admin/6808">Like It Or Not, Pot Taxes Are Coming to California</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2010/11/10/pot-taxes-are-coming-to-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009: The Year In Review – NORML&#8217;s Top 10 Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Field poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head and neck cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measure F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ogden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OR NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schedule I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zogby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#1 Obama Administration: Don&#8217;t Focus On Medical Marijuana Prosecutions United States Deputy Attorney General David Ogden issued a memorandum to federal prosecutors in October directing them to not &#8220;focus federal resources &#8230; on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.&#8221; The directive upheld a campaign promise by President Barack Obama, who had previously pledged that he was &#8220;not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue.&#8221; Read the full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_freetheprisoners.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="287" /><strong>#1 Obama Administration: Don&#8217;t Focus On Medical Marijuana Prosecutions</strong><br />
United States Deputy Attorney General David Ogden issued a <a href="http://blogs.usdoj.gov/blog/archives/192">memorandum</a> to federal prosecutors in October directing them to not &#8220;focus federal resources &#8230; on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.&#8221; The directive upheld a campaign promise by President Barack Obama, who had previously <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvUziSfMwAw">pledged</a> that he was &#8220;not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7998">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#2 Public Support For Legalizing Pot Hits All-Time High</strong><br />
A majority of U.S. voters now support legalizing marijuana, according to a <a href="http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/34651/most_americans_support_legalizing_marijuana">national poll</a> of 1,004 likely voters published in December by Angus Reid. The Angus Reid Public Opinion poll results echo those of separate national polls conducted this year by <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7996">Gallup</a>, <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7806">Zogby</a>, <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/04/30/abc-news-publics-support-for-pot-legalization-has-never-been-higher/">ABC News</a>, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/02/americans-growing-kinder-to-bud.html">CBS News</a>, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/02/americans-growing-kinder-to-bud.html">Rasmussen Reports</a>, and the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/30/BA1417BHMA.DTL&amp;hw=marijuana&amp;sn=005&amp;sc=443">California Field Poll</a>, each of which reported greater public support for marijuana legalization than ever before. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8054">here</a>.<br />
<strong><br />
#3 Lifetime Marijuana Use Associated With <em>Reduced</em> Cancer Risk</strong><br />
The moderate long-term use of cannabis is associated with a reduced risk of head and neck cancer, according to the results of a population-based control study published in August by the journal <em>Cancer Prevention Research</em>. Authors <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19638490">reported</a>, &#8220;After adjusting for potential confounders (including smoking and alcohol drinking), 10 to 20 years of marijuana use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7944">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#4 AMA Calls For Review Of Marijuana&#8217;s Prohibitive Status</strong><br />
In November, the American Medical Association resolved that marijuana should longer be classified as a Schedule I prohibited substance. Drugs classified in Schedule I are <a href="http://www.justice.gov/dea/pubs/abuse/1-csa.htm#Schedule%20I">defined</a> as possessing &#8220;no currently accepted use in treatment in the United States.&#8221; In a separate action, the AMA also <a href="http://americansforsafeaccess.org/downloads/AMA_Report.pdf">determined</a>, &#8220;Results of short term controlled trials indicate that smoked cannabis reduces neuropathic pain, improves appetite and caloric intake especially in patients with reduced muscle mass, and may relieve spasticity and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis.&#8221; Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8020">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#5 California: Lawmakers Hold Historic Hearing On Marijuana Legalization</strong><br />
State lawmakers heard <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7999">testimony</a> in October in support of taxing and regulating the commercial production and distribution of cannabis for adults age 21 and older. Additional hearings, <strong>as well as a vote</strong> on <a href="http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=12758896#at">Assembly Bill 390: the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act</a>, <strong>are scheduled for January 12, 2010</strong>. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8002">here</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-2504"></span></p>
<p><strong>#6 Maine Voters Approve Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Measure; Dispensaries Coming To Rhode Island, Washington, DC In 2010</strong><br />
Voters in November decided in favor of a statewide <a href="http://www.mainepatientsrights.org/Petition%20MEDICAL%20MARIJUANA.pdf">measure</a> that allows for the state to license non-profit facilities to distribute medical cannabis to qualified patients. The vote marked the first time that citizens ever approved a statewide ballot proposal authorizing the creation of dispensaries. In June, Rhode Island lawmakers <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7901">enacted</a> a similar measure. In December, Congress <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7901">lifted</a> federal restrictions to allow for the DC City Council to implement provisions of a ten-year-old medical marijuana law that would allow for the use and distribution of medicinal cannabis in the District of Columbia. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8011">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#7 Oakland: Voters Approve First-In-The-Nation Medical Marijuana Business Tax</strong><br />
In July 80 percent of municipal voters approved <a href="http://www.smartvoter.org/2009/07/21/ca/alm/meas/F/">Ballot Measure F</a>, the nation&#8217;s first ever business tax on the retail sales of cannabis. The tax, which takes effect on January 1, imposes an exclusive tax for &#8220;cannabis businesses&#8221; of $18 for every $1,000 of gross receipts. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7937">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#8 Rasmussen Poll: Majority Of Americans Say Marijuana Is Safer Than Alcohol</strong><br />
More than half of American adults believe that alcohol is &#8220;more dangerous&#8221; than marijuana, according to the results of a national telephone <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/august_2009/51_rate_alcohol_more_dangerous_than_marijuana">poll</a> of 1,000 likely voters published in September by Rasmussen Reports. Fifty-one percent of respondents, including a majority of women, rated the use of marijuana to be less dangerous than alcohol. Only 19 percent of those polled said that cannabis is the more dangerous of the two substances. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7965">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#9 Many Teens See Medical Cannabis As Alternative Treatment Option</strong><br />
Some one-third of adolescents view their use of marijuana as therapeutic rather than recreational, according to survey data <a href="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/7">published</a> in May by the journal <em>Substance Abuse, Treatment, Prevention and Policy</em>. Teens most commonly reported using cannabis therapeutically to counter symptoms of depression, stress and anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), physical pain, and sleeplessness. In November several mainstream media <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/23/parents-treating-children-with-medical-marijuana-cited-in-mainstream-media/">outlets</a>, including <em>The New York Times</em> and Good Morning America, featured stories on adolescents using marijuana as a medicine. Read the full story <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/23/parents-treating-children-with-medical-marijuana-cited-in-mainstream-media/">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#10 Oregon NORML Opens &#8216;Cannabis Café,&#8217; Media Frenzy Follows</strong><br />
In November <a href="http://www.ornorml.org/">Oregon NORM</a>L <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8024">opened</a> the state&#8217;s first café catering to state-authorized medical marijuana patients. Unlike conventional marijuana dispensaries that operate in states like California and Colorado, medical cannabis is not sold on the premises, nor is the primary function of the café to dispense marijuana. &#8220;This is not a medical marijuana dispensary with a café; this is a café for medical marijuana patients,&#8221; said <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7522">Madeline Martinez</a>, Oregon NORML Executive Director. <em>The Associated Press</em>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5AD06O20091114"><em>Reuters</em></a>, <em><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-11-23-cannibis-oregon_N.htm">USA Today</a></em>, <em><a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/americas-first-cannabis-cafe-open/">The New York Times</a></em>, and <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/portlands_cannabis_cafe_is_the_first">Democracy Now</a> were among the hundreds of media outlets that covered the story. Read the full story <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8024">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/12/30/2009-the-year-in-review-%e2%80%93-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Prohibition Pragmatists And A Drug War Whore</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/10/25/four-prohibition-pragmatists-and-a-drug-war-whore/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/10/25/four-prohibition-pragmatists-and-a-drug-war-whore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCIETY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Date Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Jim Doyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick review from this week&#8217;s avalanche of cannabis-related news, comes a stark contrast that reveals: Four Prohibition Pragmatists And A Drug War Whore Prohibition Pragmaticism Wisconsin &#8211; When asked by the media about a recently introduced medical cannabis bill in his state, as well as to comment on the Obama administration&#8217;s new policies on medical cannabis, Governor Jim Doyle said he has no problem with the use of cannabis to treat severe pain and other medical conditions by way of a physician&#8217;s recommendation, and that restricting the use of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick review from this week&#8217;s avalanche of cannabis-related news, comes a stark contrast that reveals: <em>Four Prohibition Pragmatists And A Drug War Whore</em></p>
<p><strong>Prohibition Pragmaticism</strong></p>
<p><em>Wisconsin</em> &#8211; When asked by the media about a recently introduced medical cannabis bill in his state, as well as to comment on the Obama administration&#8217;s new policies on medical cannabis, <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-wi-doyle-medicalmari,0,6430803.story" target="_blank">Governor Jim Doyle</a> said he has no problem with the use of cannabis to treat severe pain and other medical conditions by way of a physician&#8217;s recommendation, and that restricting the use of medical cannabis makes no sense when doctors can already prescribe more dangerous drugs like morphine.</p>
<p><em>British Columbia</em> &#8211; <a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/health/fire+chief+wants+secrecy/2119103/story.html" target="_blank">Stephen Gamble</a>, president of the Fire Chiefs&#8217; Association of B.C., recently came out in favor of fire department inspections of the home gardens of federal medical cannabis patients and caregivers in BC, to make sure the cannabis grow operations are safe, and not creating fire hazards. However, numerous medical cannabis patients and advocates in B.C. have spoken out against the proposal citing special federal privacy protections for medical patients.</p>
<p><em>Washington, D.C.</em> &#8211; The Transportation and Security Administration (TSA), in numerous <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/item.aspx?type=blog&amp;ak=620000291.blog" target="_blank">media reports</a>, acknowledged another major departure from prior administrations regarding federal medical cannabis policies: State-compliant medical cannabis patients may not be harassed or arrested for their medical cannabis whilst traveling in federally-controlled airports.</p>
<p>Oakland <a href="http://norml.org/nlc.cfm?name=Robert%20Raich%3CBR%3EMedical%20Cannabis%20Business%20Law,%20Regulations,%20&amp;%20Dispensaries&amp;website=&amp;Fax=&amp;work_phone=510-338-0700&amp;other_phone=&amp;email=raich@jps.net&amp;address=1970%20Broadway%3CBR%3ESuite%201200&amp;city=Oakland&amp;postal_code=94612&amp;stateProv=CA" target="_blank">NLC member Robert Raich</a>, for years, has been pursuing the TSA to allow medical cannabis patients flying out of Oakland International Airport to lawfully possess their medicine in compliance with TSA rules, which are to concentrate on terrorism and public safety concerns, (i.e., weapons, explosives, knives, etc&#8230;), and that pilots and the airline crew are not liable for the presence of lawfully possessed medical cannabis.</p>
<p><em>New Hampshire</em> &#8211; New Hampshire&#8217;s new US attorney, John Kacavas, told the <a href="http://www.wmur.com/news/21349455/detail.html" target="_blank">media</a> that he will not prosecute medical cannabis patients. [The new policy from Obama]&#8230;&#8221;is saying in a smarter battle against drugs, people who use it to improve their appetite, people who use it to alleviate their pain probably ought not to be prosecuted federally.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Then&#8230;The Drug War Whoring</strong></p>
<p><em>Washington, D.C.</em> &#8211; In one of the grossest, most gratuitous, desperate attempts to get media attention I&#8217;ve ever seen (which says a lot&#8230;), former public relations flack for the infamous House Select Narcotics Committee (<em>sui generis</em> of many bad, failed and constitutional-warping anti-drug legislation of the late 1980s and early 1990s. Thankfully this congressional committee no longer exists, and these days the once leaders of the group, like powerful New York democrat <a href="http://www.robryan.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=64%3Aformer-drug-war-supporter-calls-for-federal-decriminalization-of-marijuana&amp;catid=3%3Anewsflash&amp;Itemid=1" target="_blank">Charlie Rangel, now support decriminalizing cannabis</a>) and former drug czar Barry McCaffrey&#8217;s in-house anti-pot propagandist Bob Weiner employs <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/65157572.html" target="_blank">PRNewswire</a> to hump his absurd press release attacking President Obama&#8217;s and Attorney General Eric Holder&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/10/19/obama-administration-new-medical-marijuana-guidelines-are-issued/" target="_blank">clarification of their &#8216;hands off&#8217; policies regarding the use of federal law enforcement in states with medical cannabis laws</a> (and presumably in states without state protections for medical cannabis patients).</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HZX19WY2WSA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HZX19WY2WSA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>In a country where approximately 75% of the population support medical access to cannabis, one has to wonder what is wrong with people like Bob Weiner. What does he not get? Or, is the only source for his revenue and self-being these days&#8211;almost eight years after taxpayers stopped funding his anti-cannabis propaganda when Weiner, a Democratic political appointee, lost his job when the Bushies took over in 2000&#8211;is to whore himself out to the media and anti-drug groups as some kind of anti-cannabis zealot, one that mocks science with his ignorance and drips contempt for the compassion that others seem to possess.</p>
<p>Weiner, a self-proclaimed expert on cannabis, does not seem to understand that <strong>1)</strong> cannabis is not prescribed anywhere in the US, <strong>2)</strong> the DOJ memo only impacts federal, <em>not</em> state attorneys, <strong>3) </strong>Weiner claims, relying on unnamed law enforcement agents, that 9 out of 10 medical cannabis patients are frauds, citizens &#8216;faking&#8217; a medical need &#8216;just to get high&#8217;, <strong>4)</strong> Weiner oddly compares a non-toxic and therapeutic substance like cannabis to laetrile, therein invoking the late Senator Kennedy to supposedly prove the &#8220;false hope&#8221; of medical cannabis, when, in fact, Senator Kennedy supported both patient access to medical cannabis and active cannabis medical research at the <a href="http://stash.norml.org/in-last-week-of-bush-admin-dea-rejects-petition-for-scientific-study-of-medical-marijuana" target="_blank">University of Massachusetts @ Amherst</a>, and <strong>5) </strong>Weiner whines that politics, not science is the controlling factor; feigns there is a dearth of science regarding cannabis (when there are <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2008/09/12/over-17000-cannabis-related-studies-who-knew/" target="_blank">over 17,500 studies relating to cannabis and/or cannabinoids</a>).</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QcIcDZCNVG0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QcIcDZCNVG0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Watch Weiner and the so-called war on drugs get rightly ridiculed by Penn and Teller&#8230;or the entire episode <a href="http://europeanalliance.blogspot.com/2009/10/penn-and-teller-war-on-drugs.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Feast your eyes on Weiner&#8217;s Wednesday PRNewswire release to see what a real drug war whore looks like seeking the media and public spotlight:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Medical Marijuana: &#8216;Be Careful,&#8217; &#8216;Ex-White House Drug Spokesman Bob Weiner Tells DOJ About &#8216;New Lax Enforcement&#8217; Policy; &#8216;Use May Explode in Healthy People&#8217;</strong></p>
<p>WASHINGTON, Oct. 21 /<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/65157572.html" target="_blank">PRNewswire-USNewswire</a>/ &#8212; &#8220;Be careful about the new lax enforcement policy for medical marijuana,&#8221; former White House Drug Policy Spokesman Bob Weiner is telling the Department of Justice and the Obama Administration.</p>
<p>&#8220;You may get way more than you bargained for&#8221;, Weiner cautions of the new policy barring states attorneys from busting and prosecuting users and caregivers of so-called &#8220;medical&#8221; marijuana who act &#8220;in accordance with state law.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Prescription marijuana use may explode for healthy people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, as many as 90% of purchases at clinical distribution centers are &#8220;false defenses&#8221;, some law enforcement agents report &#8211; &#8220;which means individuals are not really sick but simply want the pot,&#8221; Weiner asserts.</p>
<p>&#8220;Medical marijuana is not as effective as other healing mechanisms for many illnesses such as glaucoma, pain, or nausea that users try it for because of false hype leading to false hope. Just as laetrile was legalized in the 1970&#8242;s in 27 states to cure cancer but was found to be useless apricot pits, leading Senator Kennedy in a Senate hearing to decry the &#8216;false hope&#8217; delaying true treatment, &#8216;medical&#8217; marijuana today could be a placebo delaying far better treatments,&#8221; according to Weiner.</p>
<p>&#8220;Many medical marijuana advocates press its use for pain killing and appetite enhancement,&#8221; Weiner asserted, &#8220;but you might feel just as good after a shot of gin. Science, not politics, must drive what is determined to be safe and effective medicine in America. The medical marijuana advocates never mention the potentially better applications of THC in marijuana from suppositories, jells, aerosols, or the already approved pill Marinol &#8212; they just want the high from the smoked version.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is a real danger that if marijuana is made essentially a prescription drug, its abuse and usage explosion could parallel other prescription drugs over the last decade, such as OxyContin, which have tripled nationally and quintupled in many locations because of the ease of availability.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;No one wants to deny a dying cancer patient a hit of grass, if that&#8217;s what he or she wants. But to announce and implement a policy of broad-brush non-enforcement when there is so much loose about usage of medical marijuana and its distribution is a dangerous policy.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The new policy, a three-page DOJ memo anyone can download, does not only say leave the users alone. It also says leave the &#8216;caregivers&#8217; alone if they comply with state law. The distribution centers, which are suppliers, and the staff could well be considered &#8216;caregivers&#8217;. DOJ would have serious problems discerning between illicit dealers and distributors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Weiner served as White House Drug Policy Office spokesman for 6-1/2 years and communications director of the House Select Narcotics Committee for five years.</p>
<p>Contact: Bob Weiner/Rebecca Vander Linde 301-283-0821/202-306-1200</p>
<p>SOURCE  Robert Weiner Associates Issues Strategies</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/10/25/four-prohibition-pragmatists-and-a-drug-war-whore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Profiles in Cannabis: Richard Lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/09/12/profiles-in-cannabis-richard-lee/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/09/12/profiles-in-cannabis-richard-lee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Belville, NORML Outreach Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCIETY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oaksterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=1595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NORML is proud to confirm that Richard Lee, the self-professed &#8216;Mayor of Oaksterdam&#8217; will be speaking at the 2009 NORML National Conference in San Francisco, CA. Richard Lee has been working to end cannabis prohibition for nearly two decades. In 1992 he co-founded Legal Marijuana &#8211; The Hemp Store in Houston, Texas, one of the first hemp products retail outlets in the United States. In 1997, Richard relocated to Oakland, California, where he co-founded the Hemp Research Company, which supplied medical cannabis to the Oakland Cannabis Buyers&#8217; Club, and promoted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://norml.org/images/conf2009/Richard_Lee.jpg" alt="Richard Lee" width="130" height="173" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" />NORML is proud to confirm that <a href="http://www.oaksterdamuniversity.com/facultyoakland.html#lee">Richard Lee</a>,  <a href="http://www.oaksterdamuniversity.com/facultyoakland.html#lee"></a> the  self-professed &#8216;Mayor of Oaksterdam&#8217; will be speaking at the <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7877">2009 NORML National Conference</a> in San Francisco, CA.</p>
<p>Richard Lee has been working to end cannabis prohibition for nearly two  decades. In 1992 he co-founded Legal Marijuana &#8211; The Hemp Store in Houston,  Texas, one of the first hemp products retail outlets in the United States.  In 1997, Richard relocated to Oakland, California, where he co-founded the  Hemp Research Company, which supplied medical cannabis to the Oakland  Cannabis Buyers&#8217; Club, and promoted efficient and environmentally friendly  methods of cannabis horticulture. Two years later he opened the Bulldog  Coffeeshop, the second retail cannabis outlet in &quot;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7EJGWYKziw">Oaksterdam</a>.&quot;  In 2003, Richard founded the  Oakland Civil Liberties Alliance, the political action committee that passed  Oakland&#8217;s Measure Z &#8212; making private sales, cultivation, and possession of  cannabis the lowest law enforcement priority and mandating that Oakland tax  and regulate cannabis as soon as possible under state law. More recently, he  founded the first-ever cannabis college in the United States, <a href="http://www.oaksterdamuniversity.com/">Oaksterdam  University</a>,  which seeks to provide  students with the highest quality training for the cannabis industry.    </p>
<p>Richard was one of the driving forces behind the recent passage of Oakland&#8217;s  <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7937">Measure F</a>,  which imposes the  nation&#8217;s first ever business tax on retail marijuana sales, and is presently  spearheading <a href="http://www.taxcannabis2010.org/">The Regulate, Control, and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010</a>,  which seeks to allow California adults 21  years of age and older to possess and consume, cultivate, and possess small  amounts of cannabis.  Richard will be discussing and debating various  aspects of both of these reform endeavors, and what they mean for the  cannabis community, at NORML&#8217;s 2009 conference. </p>
<p>Richard Lee  says, &quot;Yes we cannabis&quot; and so should you! Meet the Mayor of<br />
Oaksterdam  and hundreds of  other likeminded people at NORML&#8217;s 38th annual conference, taking place September 24-26 at the <a href="http://grandsanfrancisco.hyatt.com/hyatt/hotels/index.jsp?src=google_proper tyspecific_hhc_2008&#038;s_kwcid=grand hyatt san francisco|1076334038">Grand Hyatt Hotel</a> in downtown San Francisco. For registration information, please visit: <a href="http://www.norml.org/conference"> http://www.norml.org/conference</a>.</p>
<p><strong>More about Richard Lee:    </strong></p>
<p>San Francisco Examiner: <a href="http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n749/a03.html?1234">Pro-Pot Activists Take Step Toward Putting  Legalization On Ballot</a>  </p>
<p>Sacramento Bee: <a href="http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n760/a05.html?1234">Oakland pot tax adds fuel to legalization fire</a></p>
<p>CNBC&#8217;s Marijuana Inc <a href="http://www.oaksterdamuniversity.com/media.html">profiles Oaksterdam University</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/09/12/profiles-in-cannabis-richard-lee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

