<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; Question 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/question-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Voters Have Spoken &#8212; Again!</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/03/marijuana-wins-big-at-the-polls-like-always/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/03/marijuana-wins-big-at-the-polls-like-always/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breckenridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question 5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=2109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conventional wisdom dictates that if the people lead then our political leaders will follow. Of course, when it comes to marijuana law reform, conventional wisdom seldom applies. In a result that should come as a surprise to nobody &#8212; except for perhaps certain members of law enforcement and state lawmakers &#8212; Maine voters today overwhelmingly approved Question 5, the Maine Marijuana Medical Act. The measure amends existing state law by: establishing a confidential patient registry, expanding the list of qualifying conditions for which a physician may recommend medicinal cannabis, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/cannabis_flower.jpg" alt="" width="198" height="260" />Conventional wisdom dictates that if the people lead then our political leaders will follow. Of course, when it comes to marijuana law reform, conventional wisdom seldom applies.</p>
<p>In a result that should come as a surprise to nobody &#8212; except for perhaps certain members of law enforcement and state lawmakers &#8212; Maine voters today <strong>overwhelmingly <a href="http://www.wmtw.com/politics/feature.html">approved</a> Question 5</strong>, the <a href="http://www.mainepatientsrights.org/Petition%20MEDICAL%20MARIJUANA.pdf">Maine Marijuana Medical Act</a>. The measure amends existing <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#Maine">state law</a> by: establishing a confidential patient registry, expanding the list of qualifying conditions for which a physician may recommend medicinal cannabis, and by allowing for the creation of non-profit state-licensed nonprofit dispensaries to assist in the distribution of medical cannabis to qualified patients.</p>
<p>Of course for anyone following this issue, the result should not come as a surprise. Voters at the polls overwhelmingly approve marijuana law reform &#8212; virtually every time they have the opportunity to do so. Yet, over and over again voters have this opportunity <strong>because their cowardly elected officials continue to inexplicably punt on the issue</strong>.</p>
<p>In Maine, for instance, lawmakers <a href="http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090416/NEWS0104/904169975/-1/CITIZEN">voted unanimously in April</a> to put this issue before the voters rather than legislating it themselves. They did so even though state voters had previously (and by more than <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7862">60 percent</a>) approved patients&#8217; rights to use medical marijuana, and despite the fact that the current proposal had virtually no organized opposition aside from law enforcement.</p>
<p>It was the same story in Colorado, where <strong>over <a href="http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20091103/NEWS/911039974/1078&amp;ParentProfile=1055">70 percent</a> of Breckenridge voters elected today to <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=8001">amend the town code</a> to remove all criminal and civil penalties, including fines, on the private possession of up to one ounce of marijuana</strong>. Should anyone have been surprised? Not really. Over 70 percent of local voters said &#8216;yes&#8217; to a similar statewide (but unsuccessful) measure in 2005. Nonetheless, this past August the Breckenridge Town Council <a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7943">elected to dodge the issue</a> when it came up for a vote &#8212; opting instead to send it before the voters.</p>
<p>Elsewhere in Colorado today, state police and politicians were conspiring to <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_13691103">halt </a>the proliferation of medical marijuana dispensaries. Law enforcement and local politicians are engaging in <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2009/10/09/whos-behind-pot-prohibition-the-answer-is-obvious/">similar efforts</a> in southern California.</p>
<p>Yes, you read that right: <strong>cops and politicians are trying to undermine the very same reforms that the public today just embraced.</strong></p>
<p>When will they ever learn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/11/03/marijuana-wins-big-at-the-polls-like-always/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>131</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

