<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform &#187; quorum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.norml.org/tag/quorum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.norml.org</link>
	<description>Working to reform marijuana laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The New York Times Debates Marijuana Law Reform &#8212; NORML Weighs In</title>
		<link>http://blog.norml.org/2009/05/22/the-new-york-times-debates-marijuana-law-reform-norml-weighs-in/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.norml.org/2009/05/22/the-new-york-times-debates-marijuana-law-reform-norml-weighs-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTIVISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freakonomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.norml.org/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s New York Times online features a round table discussion on the subject of marijuana law reform. Two years ago we ran a quorum debating the pros and cons of decriminalizing marijuana. Since then, a largely theoretical debate has moved quite substantially toward the realm of reality, with a growing number of states and municipalities having changed their laws. &#8230; So we asked a group of people — Paul Armentano, Mike Braun, Joel W. Hay, Jeffrey Miron, and Robert Platshorn — to think about a national decriminalization of marijuana &#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://norml.org/images/blog/NORML_Remember_Prohibition.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="306" />Today&#8217;s <em>New York Times</em> online features a round table discussion on the subject of marijuana law reform.</p>
<blockquote><p>Two years ago we ran a quorum debating the pros and cons of decriminalizing marijuana. Since then, a largely theoretical debate has moved quite substantially toward the realm of reality, with a growing number of states and municipalities having changed their laws.</p>
<p>&#8230; So we asked a group of people — Paul Armentano, Mike Braun, Joel W. Hay, Jeffrey Miron, and Robert Platshorn — to think about a national decriminalization of marijuana &#8230; and answer the following: What would be some of the most powerful economic, social, and criminal-justice effects?</p>
<p>Here are their answers.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can read all of the responses, including mine, and leave your feedback for the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/pot-quorum/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.norml.org/2009/05/22/the-new-york-times-debates-marijuana-law-reform-norml-weighs-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

