Growing Like Weeds: Five New NORML Chapters Approved This Week

  • by Allen St. Pierre, Former NORML Executive Director December 9, 2010

    Some prohibitionists and politicos exceedingly rejoiced at the defeat of Prop. 19 in California this past November, hoping that the close defeat of this single legalization initiative would represent the high water mark for the now five-decade-old political and legal struggle to end Cannabis Prohibition.


    Thankfully, since the election week, both donations and applications to form new chapters are on the rise at NORML—boding very well for future reform initiatives and legislation in 2012 and beyond.

    This week, NORML’s national outreach coordinator (and podcast host) Russ Belville welcomed five new chapters to NORML’s existing 150 strong chapter network:

    Idaho NORML

    Eastern Kentucky NORML

    University of Indiana/Purdue University at Indianapolis NORML

    University of North Texas NORML

    Australia NORML

    You can view all of NORML’s domestic and international chapters here.

    Please join your local NORML chapter. If there is not one close enough for your friends, family, co-workers and you…please consider starting a local NORML chapter of your own!

    You can read and download info about forming a NORML chapter here.

    14 responses to “Growing Like Weeds: Five New NORML Chapters Approved This Week”

    1. Nic says:

      In the latest NEWS

      “The Accusations Are False: Julian Assange”


      “House Expected To Call For New Marijuana Strategy”


      America’s Longest Serving Pot Prisoner Coming To Denver


    2. Sherry says:

      Congrats Guys ! Remember you have to push it hard 2012 not all that far away.

    3. William says:

      Idaho Norml. Cool join the fight in Idaho! go to the Southern Idaho Cannabis Coalition and become a member.

    4. Nic says:

      Marijuana Dispensaries Raided In Santa Clara County, California


      The home of the free and the brave..

      More than 50 officers with the County Special Enforcement Team served search warrants and held several people Thursday following an eight-month investigation that police claimed “established probable cause” that illegal marijuana sales and money laundering took place at eight MediLeaf stores in the county, reports Action News reporter Felix Cortez at KSBW.

      Around noon,narcotics agents with search warrants hit two MediLeaf stores in San Jose and related properties in Gilroy and Morgan Hill, officials confirmed.

      “Santa Clara County is in the middle of a war,” said Erika Taylor Montgomery, a medical marijuana patient

      As of September 2010, the city of Gilroy had spent $175,529 in taxpayer money for MediLeaf litigation with law firm Berliner Cohen, according to Gilroy Finance Director Christina Turner.

      Where talking big money here..

      50 Officers, 8 months, do the math.

    5. Nic says:

      …do the math

      One-Joint Prosecution Dropped — Because Cops Lost The Joint


      “Denver cops gave Lacy Lee a shakedown at a pro-pot rally on May 1, cited her, and spent thousands of dollars to prosecute her as the case moved through the court system. Cops had to take paid days off to appear in court — for an offense carrying a maximum fine of $100.”

      It is time for some “real” change, thank you President Obama.

    6. Nic says:

      Justice Department Prepares for Ominous Expansion of “Anti-Terrorism” Law Targeting Activists

      In late September, the FBI carried out a series of raids of homes and antiwar offices of public activists in Minneapolis and Chicago. Following the raids, the Obama Justice Department subpoenaed 14 activists to a grand jury in Chicago and also subpoenaed the files of several antiwar and community organizations. In carrying out these repressive actions, the Justice Department was taking its lead from the Supreme Court’s 6-3 opinion last June in Holder v. the Humanitarian Law Project, which decided that nonviolent First Amendment speech and advocacy “coordinated with” or “under the direction of” a foreign group listed by the Secretary of State as “terrorist” was a crime.

      The search warrants and grand jury subpoenas make it clear that the federal prosecutors are intent on accusing public nonviolent political organizers, many of whom are affiliated with Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO), of providing “material support” through their public advocacy for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). The Secretary of State has determined that both the PLFP and the FARC “threaten US national security, foreign policy or economic interests,” a finding not reviewable by the courts, and listed both groups as foreign terrorist organizations (FTO).

      In 1996, Congress made it a crime – then punishable by 10 years, which was later increased to 15 years – to anyone in the US who provides “material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization or attempts or conspires to do so.” The present statute defines “material support or resources” as:

      … any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safe houses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel and transportation except medicine or religious materials.

      In the Humanitarian Law Project case, human rights workers wanted to teach members of the Kurdistan PKK, which seeks an independent Kurdish state, and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which sought an independent state in Sri Lanka, how to use humanitarian and international law to peacefully resolve disputes and obtain relief from the United Nations and other international bodies for human rights abuses by the governments of Turkey and Sri Lanka. Both organizations were designated as FTOs by the Secretary of State in a closed hearing, in which the evidence is heard secretly.

      Despite the nonviolent, peacemaking goal of the Humanitarian Law Project’s speech and training, the majority of the Supreme Court nonetheless interpreted the law to make such conduct a crime. Finding a whole new exception to the First Amendment, the Court decided that any support, even if it involves nonviolent efforts towards peace, is illegal under the law since it “frees up other resources within the organization that may be put to violent ends,” and also helps lend “legitimacy” to foreign terrorist groups. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts, despite the lack of any evidence, further opined that the FTO could use the human rights law to “intimidate, harass or destruct” its adversaries, and that even peace talks themselves could be used as a cover to re-arm for further attacks. Thus, the Court’s opinion criminalizes efforts by independent groups to work for peace if they in any way cooperate or coordinate with designated FTOs.

      The Court distinguishes what it refers to as “independent advocacy,” which it finds is not prohibited by the statute, from “advocacy performed in coordination with, or at the direction of, a foreign terrorist organization,” which is, for the first time, found to be a crime under the statute. The exact line demarcating where independent advocacy becomes impermissible coordination is left open and vague.

      Seizing on this overbroad definition of “material support,” the US government is now moving in on political groups and activists who are clearly exercising fundamental First Amendment rights by vocally opposing the government’s branding of foreign liberation movements as terrorist and supporting their struggles against US-backed repressive regimes and illegal occupations.

      Under the new definition of “material support,” the efforts of President Jimmy Carter to monitor the elections in Lebanon and coordinate with the political parties there, including the designated FTO Hezbollah, could well be prosecuted as a crime. Similarly, the publication of op-ed articles by FTO spokesmen from Hamas or other designated groups by The New York Times or The Washington Post, or the filing of amicus briefs by human rights attorneys arguing against a group’s terrorist designation or the statute itself could also now be prosecuted. Of course, the first targets of this draconian expansion of the material support law will not be a former president or the establishment media, but members of a Marxist organization who are vocal opponents of the governments of Israel and Colombia and the US policies supporting these repressive governments.

      In his foreword to Nelson Mandela’s recent autobiography “Conversations with Myself,” President Obama wrote that “Mandela’s sacrifice was so great that it called upon people everywhere to do what they could on behalf of human progress. … The first time I became politically active was during my college years, when I joined a campaign on behalf of divestment, and the effort to end apartheid in South Africa.” At the time of Mr. Obama’s First Amendment advocacy, Mr. Mandela and his organization the African National Congress (ANC) were denounced as terrorist by the US government. If the “material support” law had been in effect back then, Mr. Obama would have been subject to potential criminal prosecution. It is ironic – and the height of hypocrisy – that this same man who speaks with such reverence for Mr. Mandela and recalls his own support for the struggle against apartheid now allows the Justice Department under his command to criminalize similar First Amendment advocacy against Israeli apartheid and repressive foreign governments.

    7. […] NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform Share and Enjoy: […]

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.